These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Multiple observation processes in spatial capture-recapture models: How much do we gain? Tourani M; Dupont P; Nawaz MA; Bischof R Ecology; 2020 Jul; 101(7):e03030. PubMed ID: 32112415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Using bear rub data and spatial capture-recapture models to estimate trend in a brown bear population. Kendall KC; Graves TA; Royle JA; Macleod AC; McKelvey KS; Boulanger J; Waller JS Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):16804. PubMed ID: 31727927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Application of Spatial and Closed Capture-Recapture Models on Known Population of the Western Derby Eland (Taurotragus derbianus derbianus) in Senegal. Jůnek T; Jůnková Vymyslická P; Hozdecká K; Hejcmanová P PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0136525. PubMed ID: 26334997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. An integrated path for spatial capture-recapture and animal movement modeling. McClintock BT; Abrahms B; Chandler RB; Conn PB; Converse SJ; Emmet RL; Gardner B; Hostetter NJ; Johnson DS Ecology; 2022 Oct; 103(10):e3473. PubMed ID: 34270790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Estimation of population density by spatially explicit capture-recapture analysis of data from area searches. Efford MG Ecology; 2011 Dec; 92(12):2202-7. PubMed ID: 22352159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Consequences of severe habitat fragmentation on density, genetics, and spatial capture-recapture analysis of a small bear population. Murphy SM; Augustine BC; Ulrey WA; Guthrie JM; Scheick BK; McCown JW; Cox JJ PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0181849. PubMed ID: 28738077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A hierarchical model for estimating the spatial distribution and abundance of animals detected by continuous-time recorders. Dorazio RM; Karanth KU PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0176966. PubMed ID: 28520796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A spatial capture-recapture model for group-living species. Emmet RL; Augustine BC; Abrahms B; Rich LN; Gardner B Ecology; 2022 Oct; 103(10):e3576. PubMed ID: 34714927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A Bayesian state-space model using age-at-harvest data for estimating the population of black bears (Ursus americanus) in Wisconsin. Allen ML; Norton AS; Stauffer G; Roberts NM; Luo Y; Li Q; MacFarland D; Van Deelen TR Sci Rep; 2018 Aug; 8(1):12440. PubMed ID: 30127405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Spatial capture-recapture model performance with known small-mammal densities. Gerber BD; Parmenter RR Ecol Appl; 2015 Apr; 25(3):695-705. PubMed ID: 26214915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Incorporating capture heterogeneity in the estimation of autoregressive coefficients of animal population dynamics using capture-recapture data. Nicolau PG; Sørbye SH; Yoccoz NG Ecol Evol; 2020 Dec; 10(23):12710-12726. PubMed ID: 33304489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Coping with intrasexual behavioral differences: Capture-recapture abundance estimation of male cheetah. Edwards S; Fischer M; Wachter B; Melzheimer J Ecol Evol; 2018 Sep; 8(18):9171-9180. PubMed ID: 30377492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A review of spatial capture-recapture: Ecological insights, limitations, and prospects. Tourani M Ecol Evol; 2022 Jan; 12(1):e8468. PubMed ID: 35127014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]