These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35695037)

  • 1. Real world hypoglycaemia related to glucose variability and Flash glucose scan frequency assessed from global FreeStyle Libre data.
    Riveline JP; Wojtusciszyn A; Guerci B; Alves C; Kao K; Xu Y; Dunn TC
    Diabetes Obes Metab; 2022 Nov; 24(11):2102-2107. PubMed ID: 35695037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Frequency of flash glucose monitoring and glucose metrics: real-world observational data from Saudi Arabia.
    Al-Harbi MY; Albunyan A; Alnahari A; Kao K; Brandner L; El Jammal M; Dunn TC
    Diabetol Metab Syndr; 2022 May; 14(1):66. PubMed ID: 35501880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Flash Glucose Monitoring in Israel: Understanding Real-World Associations between Self-Monitoring Frequency and Metrics of Glycemic Control.
    Eldor R; Roitman E; Merzon E; Toledano Y; Alves C; Tsur A
    Endocr Pract; 2022 May; 28(5):472-478. PubMed ID: 35167952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Flash glucose monitoring reduces glycemic variability and hypoglycemia: real-world data from Spain.
    Gomez-Peralta F; Dunn T; Landuyt K; Xu Y; Merino-Torres JF
    BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care; 2020 Mar; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 32198165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of switch from flash glucose monitoring to flash glucose monitoring with real-time alarms on hypoglycaemia in people with type 1 diabetes mellitus.
    Gutiérrez-Pastor A; Quesada JA; Soler-Martínez MM; Carratalá Munuera C; Pomares-Gómez FJ
    Prim Care Diabetes; 2024 Jun; 18(3):333-339. PubMed ID: 38677966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The significance of coefficient of variation as a measure of hypoglycaemia risk and glycaemic control in real world users of the automated insulin delivery MiniMed 780G system.
    Castañeda J; Arrieta A; van den Heuvel T; Cohen O
    Diabetes Obes Metab; 2023 Sep; 25(9):2545-2552. PubMed ID: 37246797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. "Mind the gap please…": estimated vs. measured A
    Oriot P; Hermans MP
    Acta Clin Belg; 2020 Apr; 75(2):109-115. PubMed ID: 30596337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Real-world flash glucose monitoring patterns and associations between self-monitoring frequency and glycaemic measures: A European analysis of over 60 million glucose tests.
    Dunn TC; Xu Y; Hayter G; Ajjan RA
    Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2018 Mar; 137():37-46. PubMed ID: 29278709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Real-world flash glucose monitoring in Brazil: can sensors make a difference in diabetes management in developing countries?
    Calliari LEP; Krakauer M; Vianna AGD; Ram Y; Barbieri DE; Xu Y; Dunn TC
    Diabetol Metab Syndr; 2020; 12():3. PubMed ID: 31921360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Numerical and clinical precision in hypoglycemia of the intermittent FreeStyle Libre glucose monitoring through an NFC-Bluetooth transmitter associated with the xDrip+ algorithm in diabetic patients under insulin therapy.
    Gómez Medina AM; Henao Carrillo DC; León Vargas FM; Jojoa Jojoa RI; Quijano Naranjo JE; Rondón-Sepulveda MA; García Jaramillo MA; Muñoz Velandia OM
    Endocrinol Diabetes Nutr (Engl Ed); 2023 Mar; 70(3):212-219. PubMed ID: 36967328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A randomized controlled pilot study of continuous glucose monitoring and flash glucose monitoring in people with Type 1 diabetes and impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia.
    Reddy M; Jugnee N; El Laboudi A; Spanudakis E; Anantharaja S; Oliver N
    Diabet Med; 2018 Apr; 35(4):483-490. PubMed ID: 29230878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Flash Glucose Monitoring in the Netherlands: Increased monitoring frequency is associated with improvement of glycemic parameters.
    Lameijer A; Lommerde N; Dunn TC; Fokkert MJ; Edens MA; Kao K; Xu Y; Gans ROB; Bilo HJG; van Dijk PR
    Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2021 Jul; 177():108897. PubMed ID: 34098059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effectiveness of the freestyle libre 2 flash glucose monitoring system on diabetes-self-management practices and glycemic parameters among patients with type 1 diabetes using insulin pump.
    Al Hayek AA; Robert AA; Al Dawish MA
    Diabetes Metab Syndr; 2021; 15(5):102265. PubMed ID: 34488057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Individualization of recommendations from the international consensus on continuous glucose monitoring-derived metrics in Japanese children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes.
    Urakami T; Yoshida K; Kuwabara R; Mine Y; Aoki M; Suzuki J; Morioka I
    Endocr J; 2020 Oct; 67(10):1055-1062. PubMed ID: 32565500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk Factor Analysis for Type 2 Diabetes Patients About Hypoglycemia Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring: Results from a Prospective Observational Study.
    Uemura F; Okada Y; Mita T; Torimoto K; Wakasugi S; Katakami N; Yoshii H; Matsushita K; Nishida K; Inokuchi N; Tanaka Y; Gosho M; Shimomura I; Watada H
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2022 Jun; 24(6):435-445. PubMed ID: 35049378
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Glucose values from the same continuous glucose monitoring sensor significantly differ among readers with different generations of algorithm.
    Babaya N; Noso S; Hiromine Y; Taketomo Y; Niwano F; Yoshida S; Yasutake S; Kawabata Y; Maeda N; Ikegami H
    Sci Rep; 2024 Mar; 14(1):5099. PubMed ID: 38429333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of flash glucose monitoring on hypoglycaemia in adults with type 1 diabetes managed with multiple daily injection therapy: a pre-specified subgroup analysis of the IMPACT randomised controlled trial.
    Oskarsson P; Antuna R; Geelhoed-Duijvestijn P; Krӧger J; Weitgasser R; Bolinder J
    Diabetologia; 2018 Mar; 61(3):539-550. PubMed ID: 29273897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Continuous glucose monitoring with FreeStyle Libre PRO sensor in patients with type 2 diabetes and end-stage renal failure on haemoDIALysis (FSLPRO-DIAL pilot study).
    Henry Z; Villar E; Chauvet C; Belloi A; Prunescu I; Doroszewski F; Luyton C; Marchand L
    Acta Diabetol; 2024 Dec; 61(12):1537-1541. PubMed ID: 38922428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The relationship between glycosylated hemoglobin, time-in-range and glycemic variability in type 1 diabetes patients under flash glucose monitoring.
    Díaz-Soto G; Bahíllo-Curieses MP; Jimenez R; Nieto MO; Gomez E; Torres B; López Gomez JJ; de Luis D
    Endocrinol Diabetes Nutr (Engl Ed); 2021; 68(7):465-471. PubMed ID: 34863411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.