These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35695600)

  • 1. Evaluation and Test Methods of Industrial Exoskeletons In Vitro, In Vivo, and In Silico: A Critical Review.
    Zheng L; Lowe B; Hawke AL; Wu JZ
    Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 2021; 49(4):1-13. PubMed ID: 35695600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Systematic Review of Industrial Exoskeletons for Injury Prevention: Efficacy Evaluation Metrics, Target Tasks, and Supported Body Postures.
    Golabchi A; Chao A; Tavakoli M
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Apr; 22(7):. PubMed ID: 35408328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Industrial exoskeletons: Need for intervention effectiveness research.
    Howard J; Murashov VV; Lowe BD; Lu ML
    Am J Ind Med; 2020 Mar; 63(3):201-208. PubMed ID: 31828844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modelling for design and evaluation of industrial exoskeletons: A systematic review.
    Ma T; Zhang Y; Choi SD; Xiong S
    Appl Ergon; 2023 Nov; 113():104100. PubMed ID: 37490791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A framework for evaluation and adoption of industrial exoskeletons.
    Golabchi A; Riahi N; Fix M; Miller L; Rouhani H; Tavakoli M
    Appl Ergon; 2023 Nov; 113():104103. PubMed ID: 37499526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation Methods and Measurement Challenges for Industrial Exoskeletons.
    Li-Baboud YS; Virts A; Bostelman R; Yoon S; Rahman A; Rhode L; Ahmed N; Shah M
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Jun; 23(12):. PubMed ID: 37420770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exoskeleton Application to Military Manual Handling Tasks.
    Proud JK; Lai DTH; Mudie KL; Carstairs GL; Billing DC; Garofolini A; Begg RK
    Hum Factors; 2022 May; 64(3):527-554. PubMed ID: 33203237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Manufacturing Industry Stakeholder Perspectives on Occupational Exoskeletons: Changes after a Brief Exposure to Exoskeletons.
    Raghuraman RN; Upasani S; Gonzales A; Aviles J; Cha J; Srinivasan D
    IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors; 2023; 11(3-4):71-80. PubMed ID: 37747446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Methodologies for evaluating exoskeletons with industrial applications.
    Hoffmann N; Prokop G; Weidner R
    Ergonomics; 2022 Feb; 65(2):276-295. PubMed ID: 34415823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Critical review on applications and roles of exoskeletons in patient handling.
    Zheng L; Hawke AL; Evans K
    Int J Ind Ergon; 2022 May; 89():. PubMed ID: 35924209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Exoskeletons for industrial application and their potential effects on physical work load.
    de Looze MP; Bosch T; Krause F; Stadler KS; O'Sullivan LW
    Ergonomics; 2016 May; 59(5):671-81. PubMed ID: 26444053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Kinematic and kinetic functional requirements for industrial exoskeletons for lifting tasks and overhead lifting.
    Huysamen K; Power V; O'Sullivan L
    Ergonomics; 2020 Jul; 63(7):818-830. PubMed ID: 32320343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Towards a Functional Performance Validation Standard for Industrial Low-Back Exoskeletons: State of the Art Review.
    Pesenti M; Antonietti A; Gandolla M; Pedrocchi A
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Jan; 21(3):. PubMed ID: 33530377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Passive Shoulder Exoskeletons: More Effective in the Lab Than in the Field?
    De Bock S; Ghillebert J; Govaerts R; Elprama SA; Marusic U; Serrien B; Jacobs A; Geeroms J; Meeusen R; De Pauw K
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2021; 29():173-183. PubMed ID: 33264094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The use of exoskeletons in the occupational context for primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention of work-related musculoskeletal complaints.
    Steinhilber B; Luger T; Schwenkreis P; Middeldorf S; Bork H; Mann B; von Glinski A; Schildhauer TA; Weiler S; Schmauder M; Heinrich K; Winter G; Schnalke G; Frener P; Schick R; Wischniewski S; Jäger M
    IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors; 2020; 8(3):132-144. PubMed ID: 33140996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exoskeleton Usability Questionnaire: a preliminary evaluation questionnaire for the lower limb industrial exoskeletons.
    Hussain M; Kong YK; Park SS; Shim HH; Park J
    Ergonomics; 2024 Sep; 67(9):1198-1207. PubMed ID: 38111360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of an active and passive industrial back exoskeleton on functional performance.
    Govaerts R; De Bock S; Provyn S; Vanderborght B; Roelands B; Meeusen R; De Pauw K
    Ergonomics; 2024 May; 67(5):597-618. PubMed ID: 37480301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An industrial exoskeleton user acceptance framework based on a literature review of empirical studies.
    Elprama SA; Vanderborght B; Jacobs A
    Appl Ergon; 2022 Apr; 100():103615. PubMed ID: 34847372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Systematic Review on Lower-Limb Industrial Exoskeletons: Evaluation Methods, Evidence, and Future Directions.
    Kuber PM; Alemi MM; Rashedi E
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2023 Aug; 51(8):1665-1682. PubMed ID: 37248409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of industrial back-support exoskeletons on body loading and user experience: an updated systematic review.
    Kermavnar T; de Vries AW; de Looze MP; O'Sullivan LW
    Ergonomics; 2021 Jun; 64(6):685-711. PubMed ID: 33369518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.