These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35695868)

  • 1. On authorship in science: power, misconduct, responsibility and accountability.
    Datta S
    Indian J Med Ethics; 2022; VII(3):184-188. PubMed ID: 35695868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Scientific misconduct and accountability in teams.
    Hussinger K; Pellens M
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0215962. PubMed ID: 31048907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Responsibility for scientific misconduct in collaborative papers.
    Helgesson G; Eriksson S
    Med Health Care Philos; 2018 Sep; 21(3):423-430. PubMed ID: 29222668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving authorship accountability: ethical considerations in manuscript preparation.
    Ohler L
    Nurse Author Ed; 2003; 13(2):7-9. PubMed ID: 12715475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retractions of scientific publications: responsibility and accountability.
    Katavić V
    Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2014; 24(2):217-22. PubMed ID: 24969915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Historical model for editor and Office of Research Integrity cooperation in handling allegations, investigation, and retraction in a contentious (Abbs) case of research misconduct.
    Price AR; Daroff RB
    Account Res; 2015; 22(2):63-80. PubMed ID: 25397599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An analytic hierarchy process model to apportion co-author responsibility.
    Sheskin TJ
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2006 Jul; 12(3):555-65. PubMed ID: 16909157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Scientific misconduct and editorial and peer review processes.
    Fox MF
    J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):298-309. PubMed ID: 11653366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inappropriate authorship in collaborative science research.
    Pennock RT
    Public Aff Q; 1996 Oct; 10(4):379-93. PubMed ID: 11654653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Unethical practices in authorship of scientific papers.
    Bennett DM; Taylor DM
    Emerg Med (Fremantle); 2003 Jun; 15(3):263-70. PubMed ID: 12786648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Misconduct as the main cause for retraction. A descriptive study of retracted publications and their authors.
    Campos-Varela I; Ruano-Raviña A
    Gac Sanit; 2019; 33(4):356-360. PubMed ID: 29776690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Authorship for scientific papers: the new challenges.
    Garcia CC; Martrucelli CR; Rossilho Mde M; Denardin OV
    Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc; 2010; 25(4):559-67. PubMed ID: 21340387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Haunted manuscripts: ghost authorship in the medical literature.
    Ngai S; Gold JL; Gill SS; Rochon PA
    Account Res; 2005; 12(2):103-14. PubMed ID: 16220624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Not being clear about authorship is lying and damages the scientific record.
    England C; Hodgkinson M; Tamber PS
    Natl Med J India; 2007; 20(2):56-8. PubMed ID: 17802982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Gift authorship: Look the gift horse in the mouth.
    Varghese J; Jacob M
    Indian J Med Ethics; 2022; VII(3):196-202. PubMed ID: 35699293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Scientific misconduct and correcting the scientific literature.
    Parrish DM
    Acad Med; 1999 Mar; 74(3):221-30. PubMed ID: 10099640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Time to kill the scientific "author"?
    Adams B
    BMJ; 2015 Dec; 351():h6560. PubMed ID: 26646439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Authorship Issues When Articles are Retracted Due to Research Misconduct and Then Resubmitted.
    Banerjee T; Partin K; Resnik DB
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2022 Jul; 28(4):31. PubMed ID: 35796841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The case for affiliation contribution statements.
    Polonioli A
    Account Res; 2024 May; 31(4):377-383. PubMed ID: 36174741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The fruits of authorship.
    Juyal D; Thawani V; Thaledi S; Prakash A
    Educ Health (Abingdon); 2014; 27(2):217-20. PubMed ID: 25420989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.