These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35696041)

  • 1. Regulatory and Policy Considerations Around Genome Editing in Agriculture.
    Friedrichs S; Ludlow K; Kearns P
    Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2495():327-366. PubMed ID: 35696041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Regulatory aspects of gene editing in Argentina.
    Lema MA
    Transgenic Res; 2019 Aug; 28(Suppl 2):147-150. PubMed ID: 31321697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Will the EU stay out of step with science and the rest of the world on plant breeding innovation?
    Jorasch P
    Plant Cell Rep; 2020 Jan; 39(1):163-167. PubMed ID: 31754780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The EU regulatory framework on genetically modified organisms (GMOs).
    Bruetschy C
    Transgenic Res; 2019 Aug; 28(Suppl 2):169-174. PubMed ID: 31321701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Regulatory approaches for genome edited agricultural plants in select countries and jurisdictions around the world.
    Entine J; Felipe MSS; Groenewald JH; Kershen DL; Lema M; McHughen A; Nepomuceno AL; Ohsawa R; Ordonio RL; Parrott WA; Quemada H; Ramage C; Slamet-Loedin I; Smyth SJ; Wray-Cahen D
    Transgenic Res; 2021 Aug; 30(4):551-584. PubMed ID: 33970411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genetically modified organisms: adapting regulatory frameworks for evolving genome editing technologies.
    Rozas P; Kessi-Pérez EI; Martínez C
    Biol Res; 2022 Oct; 55(1):31. PubMed ID: 36266673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. New GMO regulations for old: Determining a new future for EU crop biotechnology.
    Davison J; Ammann K
    GM Crops Food; 2017 Jan; 8(1):13-34. PubMed ID: 28278120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Proving that a genome-edited organism is not GMO.
    Ishii M; Ishii T
    Trends Biotechnol; 2022 May; 40(5):525-528. PubMed ID: 34893376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The evolving landscape around genome editing in agriculture: Many countries have exempted or move to exempt forms of genome editing from GMO regulation of crop plants.
    Schmidt SM; Belisle M; Frommer WB
    EMBO Rep; 2020 Jun; 21(6):e50680. PubMed ID: 32431018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clarifying the regulation of genome editing in Australia: situation for genetically modified organisms.
    Thygesen P
    Transgenic Res; 2019 Aug; 28(Suppl 2):151-159. PubMed ID: 31321698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genetically modified crop regulations: scope and opportunity using the CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing approach.
    Gupta S; Kumar A; Patel R; Kumar V
    Mol Biol Rep; 2021 May; 48(5):4851-4863. PubMed ID: 34114124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A research program for the socioeconomic impacts of gene editing regulation.
    Whelan AI; Lema MA
    GM Crops Food; 2017 Jan; 8(1):74-83. PubMed ID: 28080208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Consumer acceptance of food crops developed by genome editing.
    Ishii T; Araki M
    Plant Cell Rep; 2016 Jul; 35(7):1507-18. PubMed ID: 27038939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evolving Regulatory Landscape for Genome-Edited Plants.
    Zannoni L
    CRISPR J; 2019 Feb; 2():3-8. PubMed ID: 31021233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A future scenario of the global regulatory landscape regarding genome-edited crops.
    Ishii T; Araki M
    GM Crops Food; 2017 Jan; 8(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 27960622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Canadian regulatory perspectives on genome engineered crops.
    Smyth SJ
    GM Crops Food; 2017 Jan; 8(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 27858499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Risk-appropriate regulations for gene-editing technologies.
    Brookes G; Smyth SJ
    GM Crops Food; 2024 Dec; 15(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 38215017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Towards social acceptance of plant breeding by genome editing.
    Araki M; Ishii T
    Trends Plant Sci; 2015 Mar; 20(3):145-9. PubMed ID: 25726138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Legal and practical challenges to authorization of gene edited plants in the EU.
    Sowa S; Twardowski T; Woźniak E; Zimny T
    N Biotechnol; 2021 Jan; 60():183-188. PubMed ID: 33115638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Roads Forward for European GMO Policy-Uncertainties in Wake of ECJ Judgment Have to be Mitigated by Regulatory Reform.
    Wasmer M
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2019; 7():132. PubMed ID: 31231643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.