203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3569614)
1. Evolving Delaware law on the termination of life-sustaining treatment.
Hayman S
Del Med J; 1987 Mar; 59(3):205-8, 213-4. PubMed ID: 3569614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Viewing the "Draft guidelines for state court decision making in authorizing or withdrawing life-sustaining medical treatment" from the perspective of related areas of law and economics: a critique.
Gorby JD
Issues Law Med; 1992; 7(4):477-510. PubMed ID: 1563939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Equality for the elderly incompetent: a proposal for dignified death.
Merritt TL
Stanford Law Rev; 1987 Feb; 39(3):689-736. PubMed ID: 10281165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Legalistic ethics and the lingering doubt about withdrawing life-supports.
Vaux K
J Allied Health; 1991; 20(3):165-79. PubMed ID: 1761409
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The role of the courts in terminating life-sustaining medical treatment.
Leibson CM
Issues Law Med; 1995; 10(4):437-51. PubMed ID: 7737849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical dilemmas when patients want assistance in dying.
Howe EG
J Clin Ethics; 1994; 5(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 8003720
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Nutrition and hydration for patients: the constitutional aspects.
Bopp J
Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(1):3-52. PubMed ID: 3045047
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Aspects of the dilemma: when and how should treatment be withheld or withdrawn?
Frelick RW
Del Med J; 1989 Jun; 61(6):305-7. PubMed ID: 2753191
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Physician-assisted suicide and the right to die with assistance.
Harv Law Rev; 1992 Jun; 105(8):2021-40. PubMed ID: 10119163
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Termination of life support systems in the elderly. Discussion: To die before the gods please: legal issues surrounding euthanasia and the elderly.
Baron CH
J Geriatr Psychiatry; 1981; 14(1):45-70. PubMed ID: 7343584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The insane root takes reason prisoner.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(1):29-31. PubMed ID: 2497081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Courts, gender and "the right to die".
Miles SH; August A
Law Med Health Care; 1990; 18(1-2):85-95. PubMed ID: 2374456
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. In thunder, lightning or in rain: what three doctors can do.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1987; 17(5):28-30. PubMed ID: 3692804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The fusion of medicine and law for in extremis health and medical decisions: does it produce energy and light or just cosmic debris?
Bellacosa JW
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1990; 18(1):5-21. PubMed ID: 2328334
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Accepting the consequences of a treatment-refusal decision.
Moore DL
Bioeth Bull; 1995; 4(2):13-7. PubMed ID: 11822418
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Guidelines for state court decision making in life-sustaining medical treatment cases.
Hafemeister TL
Issues Law Med; 1992; 7(4):443-75. PubMed ID: 1563938
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. When is medical treatment "futile"?
Bennett AJ
Issues Law Med; 1993; 9(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 8354625
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Borrowed lessons: the role of ethical distinctions in framing law on life-sustaining treatment.
Capron AM
Ariz State Law J; 1984; 1984(4):647-60. PubMed ID: 16184674
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. But, why do we shoot horses?: an analysis of the right to die and euthanasia.
Davidson SI
N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1994; 12(1):115-61. PubMed ID: 16086499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Substitute consent. Reconciling negative treatment and consent to routine medical treatment.
Sappington GM
J Leg Med; 1986 Sep; 7(3):341-55. PubMed ID: 3490528
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
