138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35696160)
1. Value of the Copenhagen index in the diagnosis of malignant adnexal tumors: A meta-analysis.
Yue X; Yue Z; Wang Y; Dong Z; Yang H; Yue S
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2023 Feb; 160(2):506-515. PubMed ID: 35696160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm and Copenhagen Index for the preoperative assessment of Japanese women with ovarian tumors.
Iizuka M; Hamada Y; Matsushima J; Ichikawa T; Irie T; Yamaguchi N; Sakamoto S; Ban S; Takakura S
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2023 Nov; 49(11):2717-2727. PubMed ID: 37643727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm versus Risk Malignancy Index-I for Preoperative Assessment of Adnexal Masses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Chacón E; Dasí J; Caballero C; Alcázar JL
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2019; 84(6):591-598. PubMed ID: 31311023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of CA 125 alone and risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA) in patients with adnexal mass: A multicenter study.
Choi HJ; Lee YY; Sohn I; Kim YM; Kim JW; Kang S; Kim BG
Curr Probl Cancer; 2020 Apr; 44(2):100508. PubMed ID: 31708114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Comparison of serum cancer antigen 125, human epididymis protein 4, ROMA, and CPH-I for diagnosis of ovarian cancer in Chinese patients with ovarian mass].
Shipeng G; Yongning C; Yadi Z; Chanyuan LI; Qifan J
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2019 Dec; 39(12):1393-1401. PubMed ID: 31907150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing the Copenhagen Index (CPH-I) and Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA): Two equivalent ways to differentiate malignant from benign ovarian tumors before surgery?
Yoshida A; Derchain SF; Pitta DR; Andrade LA; Sarian LO
Gynecol Oncol; 2016 Mar; 140(3):481-5. PubMed ID: 26825617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of different strategies to triage women with adnexal masses: a prospective study.
Piovano E; Cavallero C; Fuso L; Viora E; Ferrero A; Gregori G; Grillo C; Macchi C; Mengozzi G; Mitidieri M; Pagano E; Zola P
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Sep; 50(3):395-403. PubMed ID: 27706929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Copenhagen Index versus ROMA in preoperative ovarian malignancy risk stratification: Result from the first Vietnamese prospective cohort study.
Tran DT; Vo VK; Le MT; Chuang L; Nguyen VQH
Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Jul; 162(1):113-119. PubMed ID: 33994145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the predictive performance of risk of malignancy indexes 1-4, HE4 and risk of malignancy algorithm in the triage of adnexal masses.
Hada A; Han LP; Chen Y; Hu QH; Yuan Y; Liu L
J Ovarian Res; 2020 Apr; 13(1):46. PubMed ID: 32334618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic measures comparison for ovarian malignancy risk in Epithelial ovarian cancer patients: a meta-analysis.
Suri A; Perumal V; Ammalli P; Suryan V; Bansal SK
Sci Rep; 2021 Aug; 11(1):17308. PubMed ID: 34453074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the Copenhagen Index versus ROMA for the preoperative assessment of women with ovarian tumors.
Minar L; Felsinger M; Cermakova Z; Zlamal F; Bienertova-Vasku J
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2018 Feb; 140(2):241-246. PubMed ID: 29086914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does risk for ovarian malignancy algorithm excel human epididymis protein 4 and CA125 in predicting epithelial ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis.
Li F; Tie R; Chang K; Wang F; Deng S; Lu W; Yu L; Chen M
BMC Cancer; 2012 Jun; 12():258. PubMed ID: 22712526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Diagnostic accuracy of ROMA index in diagnosing ovarian malignancy in pelvic mass patients].
Luo Y; Wang YF; Chen GW
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jul; 99(27):2141-2144. PubMed ID: 31315387
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Subjective assessment by ultrasound is superior to the risk of malignancy index (RMI) or the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA) in discriminating benign from malignant adnexal masses.
Van Gorp T; Veldman J; Van Calster B; Cadron I; Leunen K; Amant F; Timmerman D; Vergote I
Eur J Cancer; 2012 Jul; 48(11):1649-56. PubMed ID: 22226481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The accuracy of risk malignancy index in prediction of malignancy in women with adnexal mass in Basrah, Iraq.
Al-Asadi JN; Al-Maliki SK; Al-Dahhhan F; Al-Naama L; Suood F
Niger J Clin Pract; 2018 Oct; 21(10):1254-1259. PubMed ID: 30297555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. CPH-I and HE4 Are More Favorable Than CA125 in Differentiating Borderline Ovarian Tumors from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer at Early Stages.
Wang Z; Tao X; Ying C
Dis Markers; 2019; 2019():6241743. PubMed ID: 31737130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A novel diagnostic index combining HE4, CA125 and age may improve triage of women with suspected ovarian cancer - An international multicenter study in women with an ovarian mass.
Karlsen MA; Høgdall EV; Christensen IJ; Borgfeldt C; Kalapotharakos G; Zdrazilova-Dubska L; Chovanec J; Lok CA; Stiekema A; Mutz-Dehbalaie I; Rosenthal AN; Moore EK; Schodin BA; Sumpaico WW; Sundfeldt K; Kristjansdottir B; Zapardiel I; Høgdall CK
Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Sep; 138(3):640-6. PubMed ID: 26086566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Evaluation of applicability of HE4 and ROMA in the preoperative diagnosis of adnexal masses].
Janas L; Głowacka E; Wilczyński JR; Malinowski A; Nowak M
Ginekol Pol; 2015 Mar; 86(3):193-7. PubMed ID: 25920309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic performance of human epididymis protein 4 compared to a combination of biophysical and biochemical markers to differentiate ovarian endometriosis from epithelial ovarian cancer in premenopausal women.
Nikolova T; Zivadinovic R; Evtimovska N; Klisarovska V; Stanojevic M; Georgievska J; Nikolova N
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1870-1879. PubMed ID: 29027715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Approaches to the detection of ovarian cancer.
Høgdall E
Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl; 2016; 245():S49-53. PubMed ID: 27435369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
