128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35696708)
1. Comparison of Relative Value Units and 30-Day Outcomes Between Primary and Revision Pediatric Spinal Deformity Surgery.
Song J; Katz AD; Dalal S; Silber J; Essig D; Qureshi S; Virk S
Clin Spine Surg; 2023 Feb; 36(1):E40-E44. PubMed ID: 35696708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Value per Operative Time between Primary and Revision Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.
Song J; Katz AD; Silber J; Essig D; Qureshi SA; Virk S
Asian Spine J; 2023 Jun; 17(3):485-491. PubMed ID: 37183001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Navigated versus conventional pediatric spinal deformity surgery: Navigation independently predicts reoperation and infectious complications.
Katz AD; Song J; Hasan S; Galina JM; Virk S; Silber JS; Essig D; Sarwahi V
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine; 2023; 14(2):165-174. PubMed ID: 37448507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. 30-day Outcomes in Primary vs. Revision Posterior Spinal Fusion for Pediatric Spinal Deformity.
Malik AT; Yu E; Kim J; Khan SN
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2019 May; 180():106-110. PubMed ID: 30954807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Revision ACL reconstruction has higher incidence of 30-day hospital readmission, reoperation, and surgical complications relative to primary procedures.
Marx JS; Plantz MA; Gerlach EB; Carney J; Swiatek PR; Cantrell CK; Tjong VK
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2022 May; 30(5):1605-1610. PubMed ID: 34279703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Risk factors associated with short-term complications and mortality after pediatric spinal arthrodesis.
Abu-Bonsrah N; Goodwin CR; Ortega G; Abdullah F; Cornwell E; De la Garza-Ramos R; Groves ML; Ain M; Sponseller PD; Sciubba DM
Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Oct; 43(4):E7. PubMed ID: 28965454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Comparison of Relative Value Units in Primary versus Revision Total Ankle Arthroplasty.
Sodhi N; Yao B; Newman JM; Jawad M; Khlopas A; Sultan AA; Lamaj S; Beyer GA; Wilhelm AB; Mont MA
Surg Technol Int; 2017 Dec; 31():322-326. PubMed ID: 29316589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of a Posterior versus Anterior Approach for Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery Based on Relative Value Units.
Sodhi N; Patel Y; Berger RJ; Newman JM; Anis HK; Ehiorobo JO; Khlopas A; Desai R; Hollern DA; Schwartz JM; Paulino CB; Mont MA
Surg Technol Int; 2019 Nov; 35():363-368. PubMed ID: 31373381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The incidence and risk factors for short-term morbidity and mortality in pediatric deformity spinal surgery: an analysis of the NSQIP pediatric database.
Pugely AJ; Martin CT; Gao Y; Ilgenfritz R; Weinstein SL
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Jul; 39(15):1225-34. PubMed ID: 24732856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Primary and Revision Posterior Lumbar Fusion Have Similar Short-Term Complication Rates.
Basques BA; Diaz-Collado PJ; Geddes BJ; Samuel AM; Lukasiewicz AM; Webb ML; Bohl DD; Ahn J; Singh K; Grauer JN
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Jan; 41(2):E101-6. PubMed ID: 26539938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lumbar fusion during the COVID-19 pandemic: greater rates of morbidity and longer procedures.
Song J; Katz AD; Qureshi SA; Virk SS; Sarwahi V; Silber J; Essig D
J Spine Surg; 2023 Mar; 9(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 37038422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Barriers to Revision Total Hip Service Lines: A Surgeon's Perspective Through a Deterministic Financial Model.
Feng JE; Anoushiravani AA; Schoof LH; Gabor JA; Padilla J; Slover J; Schwarzkopf R
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Jul; 478(7):1657-1666. PubMed ID: 32574471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Postoperative Outcomes in Diabetic Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgery Patients: A National Database Study.
Farahani F; Ahn J; Nakonezny PA; Wukich DK; Wimberly RL; Riccio AI
J Pediatr Orthop; 2021 Sep; 41(8):e664-e670. PubMed ID: 34138820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Are We Appropriately Compensated by Relative Value Units for Primary vs Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty?
Sodhi N; Piuzzi NS; Khlopas A; Newman JM; Kryzak TJ; Stearns KL; Mont MA
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Feb; 33(2):340-344. PubMed ID: 28993077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Thirty-day readmission and reoperation after surgery for spinal tumors: a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis.
Karhade AV; Vasudeva VS; Dasenbrock HH; Lu Y; Gormley WB; Groff MW; Chi JH; Smith TR
Neurosurg Focus; 2016 Aug; 41(2):E5. PubMed ID: 27476847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Comparison of Relative Value Units in Primary Versus Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Peterson J; Sodhi N; Khlopas A; Piuzzi NS; Newman JM; Sultan AA; Stearns KL; Mont MA
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Jul; 33(7S):S39-S42. PubMed ID: 29276122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Complication rates are reduced for revision adult spine deformity surgery among high-volume hospitals and surgeons.
Paul JC; Lonner BS; Goz V; Weinreb J; Karia R; Toombs CS; Errico TJ
Spine J; 2015 Sep; 15(9):1963-72. PubMed ID: 25937293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. What is a better value for your time? Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus cervical disc arthroplasty.
Katz AD; Song J; Bowles D; Ng T; Neufeld E; Hasan S; Perfetti D; Sodhi N; Essig D; Silber J; Virk S
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine; 2022; 13(3):331-338. PubMed ID: 36263340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Relative Value Units Underestimate Reimbursement for Revision Shoulder Arthroplasty.
Belay ES; Charalambous LT; Saltzman EB; Klifto CS; Anakwenze O
J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2022 May; 30(9):416-420. PubMed ID: 35171845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of the 2016 American College of Surgeons Guideline Revision on Overlapping Lumbar Fusion Cases at a Large Academic Medical Center.
Farooqi AS; Borja AJ; Jabarkheel R; Glauser G; Strouz K; McClintock SD; Malhotra NR
World Neurosurg; 2022 Dec; 168():e76-e86. PubMed ID: 36096382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
