These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35697642)

  • 21. Experience and complications associated with use of guide extension catheters in percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Waterbury TM; Sorajja P; Bell MR; Lennon RJ; Mathew V; Singh M; Sandhu GS; Gulati R
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Dec; 88(7):1057-1065. PubMed ID: 26698371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Complex robotic-enhanced percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Kapur V; Smilowitz NR; Weisz G
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 May; 83(6):915-21. PubMed ID: 24167108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Robotic Percutaneous Coronary Intervention During COVID-19 Pandemic: Outcomes and Cost Effectiveness With Procedural Distancing.
    Sooknanan NN; Memon S; George JC
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2022 Feb; 34(2):E87-E91. PubMed ID: 34928816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention in the COVID-19 pandemic.
    Yamaji K; Mitsutake Y; Nakano M; Nakamura T; Fukumoto Y
    J Cardiol; 2022 Apr; 79(4):455-459. PubMed ID: 34454811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Robotic percutaneous coronary intervention: current evidence, practical aspects and future perspectives].
    Toselli M; Nerla R; Ruggero R; Chandra K; Sbarzaglia P; Oshoala K; Margheri M; Giannini F; Castriota F
    G Ital Cardiol (Rome); 2021 Dec; 22(12 Suppl 2):16-22. PubMed ID: 35343486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Longitudinal Geographic Miss (LGM) in Robotic Assisted Versus Manual Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.
    Bezerra HG; Mehanna E; W Vetrovec G; A Costa M; Weisz G
    J Interv Cardiol; 2015 Oct; 28(5):449-55. PubMed ID: 26489972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Through Transradial Approach: Experience in 4 Patients with Complex Lesions.
    Anuwatworn A; Ali Kahn M; Stys T; Petrasko M; Stys A
    Tex Heart Inst J; 2020 Apr; 47(2):144-148. PubMed ID: 32603464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of a Saphenous Vein Graft Stenosis using a FilterWire EZ Embolic Protection.
    Anuwatworn A; Stys T; Stys A
    S D Med; 2018 Feb; 71(2):59-61. PubMed ID: 29990411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Clinical and technical outcomes of robotic versus manual percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Jaffar-Karballai M; Haque A; Voller C; Elleithy A; Harky A
    J Cardiol; 2022 Dec; 80(6):495-504. PubMed ID: 35165012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Impact of Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Complex Procedures.
    Choi KH; Song YB; Lee JM; Lee SY; Park TK; Yang JH; Choi JH; Choi SH; Gwon HC; Hahn JY
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Apr; 12(7):607-620. PubMed ID: 30878474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Robotically performed excimer laser coronary atherectomy: Proof of feasibility.
    Almasoud A; Walters D; Mahmud E
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Oct; 92(4):713-716. PubMed ID: 29521479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Rise of the Machines.
    Gruberg L
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2022 Oct; 43():120-122. PubMed ID: 35918251
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Periprocedural and 30-day outcomes of robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention used in the intravascular imaging guidance.
    Koeda Y; Ishida M; Sasaki K; Kikuchi S; Yamaya S; Tsuji K; Ishisone T; Goto I; Kimura T; Shimoda Y; Doi A; Morino Y
    Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2023 Jan; 38(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 35511339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Mangels DR; Giri J; Hirshfeld J; Wilensky RL
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Nov; 90(6):948-955. PubMed ID: 28722293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Efficacy and Safety of the GuideLiner Mother-in-Child Guide Catheter Extension in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Sharma D; Shah A; Osten M; Ing D; Barolet A; Overgaard CB; Džavík V; Seidelin PH
    J Interv Cardiol; 2017 Feb; 30(1):46-55. PubMed ID: 27862338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Short-term follow-up results of hybrid coronary revascularization by robotic coronary artery bypass grafting and stent implantation].
    Yang M; Gao C; Liu S; Wu Y; Xiao C; Wang R
    Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2015 Aug; 35(8):1166-9. PubMed ID: 26277515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention: the future or the past?
    Durand E; Eltchaninoff H
    EuroIntervention; 2024 Jan; 20(1):19-20. PubMed ID: 38165114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Resource Utilization During Elective Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Mangels D; Fregoso A; Ang L; Mahmud E
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2020 Dec; 32(12):E321-E325. PubMed ID: 32829309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Magnetic navigation facilitates percutaneous coronary intervention for complex lesions.
    Sandhu GS; Sanon S; Holmes DR; Gulati R; Brilakis ES; Lennon RJ; Rihal CS
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Oct; 84(4):660-7. PubMed ID: 24327388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Concept, Data, and Clinical Application.
    Walters D; Omran J; Patel M; Reeves R; Ang L; Mahmud E
    Interv Cardiol Clin; 2019 Apr; 8(2):149-159. PubMed ID: 30832939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.