These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35697952)

  • 1. Tonotopic Selectivity in Cats and Humans: Electrophysiology and Psychophysics.
    Guérit F; Middlebrooks JC; Richardson ML; Arneja A; Harland AJ; Gransier R; Wouters J; Carlyon RP
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2022 Aug; 23(4):513-534. PubMed ID: 35697952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Physiological mechanisms of psychophysical masking: observations from auditory-nerve fibers.
    Delgutte B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Feb; 87(2):791-809. PubMed ID: 2307776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Frequency tuning curves derived from auditory steady state evoked potentials: a proof-of-concept study.
    Markessis E; Poncelet L; Colin C; Coppens A; Hoonhorst I; Kadhim H; Deltenre P
    Ear Hear; 2009 Feb; 30(1):43-53. PubMed ID: 19125026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Human auditory brainstem response to temporal gaps in noise.
    Werner LA; Folsom RC; Mancl LR; Syapin CL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2001 Aug; 44(4):737-50. PubMed ID: 11521768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Antimasking effects of the olivocochlear reflex. II. Enhancement of auditory-nerve response to masked tones.
    Kawase T; Delgutte B; Liberman MC
    J Neurophysiol; 1993 Dec; 70(6):2533-49. PubMed ID: 8120597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neural mechanisms of tone-on-tone masking: patterns of discharge rate and discharge synchrony related to rates of spontaneous discharge in the chinchilla auditory nerve.
    Sinex DG; Havey DC
    J Neurophysiol; 1986 Dec; 56(6):1763-80. PubMed ID: 3806187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neural correlates and mechanisms of spatial release from masking: single-unit and population responses in the inferior colliculus.
    Lane CC; Delgutte B
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 Aug; 94(2):1180-98. PubMed ID: 15857966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Psychophysical suppression as a function of signal frequency: noise and tonal maskers.
    Lee J; Bacon SP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Aug; 104(2 Pt 1):1013-22. PubMed ID: 9714921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reconciling frequency selectivity and phase effects in masking.
    Oxenham AJ; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Sep; 110(3 Pt 1):1525-38. PubMed ID: 11572363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of signal delay on auditory filter shapes derived from psychophysical tuning curves and notched-noise data obtained in simultaneous masking.
    Bacon SP; Repovsch-Duffey JL; Liu L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jul; 112(1):227-37. PubMed ID: 12141348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comodulation masking release (CMR) as a function of masker bandwidth, modulator bandwidth, and signal duration.
    Schooneveldt GP; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jan; 85(1):273-81. PubMed ID: 2921409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Normal critical bands in the cat.
    Pickles JO
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1975; 80(3-4):245-54. PubMed ID: 1180038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of masker spectral asymmetry on overshoot in simultaneous masking.
    Schmidt S; Zwicker E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Mar; 89(3):1324-30. PubMed ID: 2030219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Psychophysical assessment of spatial spread of excitation in electrical hearing with single and dual electrode contact maskers.
    Dingemanse JG; Frijns JH; Briaire JJ
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):645-57. PubMed ID: 17086076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Functional characteristics of cochlear nucleus in behaving cat examined by acoustic masking of electrical stimuli.
    Frederickson CJ; Gerken GM
    J Neurophysiol; 1978 Nov; 41(6):1535-45. PubMed ID: 731289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors affecting psychophysical tuning curves for normally hearing subjects.
    Kluk K; Moore BC
    Hear Res; 2004 Aug; 194(1-2):118-34. PubMed ID: 15276683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characterizing frequency selectivity for envelope fluctuations.
    Ewert SD; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):1181-96. PubMed ID: 11008819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correlated individual differences in conditions used to measure psychophysical suppression and signal enhancement.
    Wright BA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Nov; 100(5):3295-303. PubMed ID: 8914311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Release from upward spread of masking in regions of high-frequency hearing loss.
    Nelson DA; Schroder AC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Oct; 100(4 Pt 1):2266-77. PubMed ID: 8865635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detectability of simultaneously masked signals as a function of signal bandwidth for different signal delays.
    Wright BA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Nov; 98(5 Pt 1):2493-503. PubMed ID: 7593932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.