These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35697952)

  • 21. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Notched-noise measures of frequency selectivity in adults and children using fixed-masker-level and fixed-signal-level presentation.
    Hall JW; Grose JH
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Jun; 34(3):651-60. PubMed ID: 2072690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evoked response narrow-band noise masking patterns in the chinchilla.
    Zhang W; Salvi RJ; Powers N; Wu J
    Hear Res; 1990 Aug; 47(1-2):175-81. PubMed ID: 2228795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Sensitivity of auditory cortical neurons to locations of signals and competing noise sources.
    Furukawa S; Middlebrooks JC
    J Neurophysiol; 2001 Jul; 86(1):226-40. PubMed ID: 11431504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Asymmetry of masking in the European starling: behavioural auditory thresholds.
    Langemann U; Klump GM
    Hear Res; 2006 Nov; 221(1-2):26-35. PubMed ID: 16973317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influence of frequency selectivity on comodulation masking release in normal-hearing listeners.
    Hall JW; Grose JH; Moore BC
    J Speech Hear Res; 1993 Apr; 36(2):410-23. PubMed ID: 8487531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Neural responses in the inferior colliculus to binaural masking level differences created by inverting the noise in one ear.
    Palmer AR; Jiang D; McAlpine D
    J Neurophysiol; 2000 Aug; 84(2):844-52. PubMed ID: 10938311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The relative role of beats and combination tones in determining the shapes of masking patterns: II. Hearing-impaired listeners.
    Alcántara JI; Moore BC
    Hear Res; 2002 Mar; 165(1-2):103-16. PubMed ID: 12031520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Masking patterns for sinusoidal and narrow-band noise maskers.
    Moore BC; Alcántara JI; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Aug; 104(2 Pt 1):1023-38. PubMed ID: 9714922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Different auditory filter bandwidth estimates based on profile analysis, notched noise, and hybrid tasks.
    Lentz JJ; Richards VM; Matiasek MR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Nov; 106(5):2779-92. PubMed ID: 10573893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Growth-of-masking functions for several types of maskers.
    Glasberg BR; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Jul; 96(1):134-44. PubMed ID: 8064016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Forward masking by maskers of uncertain frequency content.
    Neff DL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Mar; 89(3):1314-23. PubMed ID: 2030218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Antimasking effects of the olivocochlear reflex. I. Enhancement of compound action potentials to masked tones.
    Kawase T; Liberman MC
    J Neurophysiol; 1993 Dec; 70(6):2519-32. PubMed ID: 8120596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of auditory filter shapes obtained with notched-noise and noise-tone maskers.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR; van der Heijden M; Houtsma AJ; Kohlrausch A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Feb; 97(2):1175-82. PubMed ID: 7876439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effective masking levels for bone conduction auditory steady state responses in infants and adults with normal hearing.
    Hansen EE; Small SA
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):257-66. PubMed ID: 21926629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evidence that comodulation detection differences depend on within-channel mechanisms.
    Borrill SJ; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jan; 111(1 Pt 1):309-19. PubMed ID: 11833537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. High-level psychophysical tuning curves: simultaneous masking by pure tones and 100-Hz-wide noise bands.
    Nelson DA; Fortune TW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Apr; 34(2):360-73. PubMed ID: 2046360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Modulation masking in cochlear implant listeners: envelope versus tonotopic components.
    Chatterjee M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Apr; 113(4 Pt 1):2042-53. PubMed ID: 12703715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Masking of short probe sounds by tone bursts with a sweeping frequency.
    Smoorenburg GF; Coninx F
    Hear Res; 1980 Dec; 3(4):301-16. PubMed ID: 7451378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.