These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35698009)

  • 41. Impact Factors and Prediction of Popular Topics in a Journal.
    Nielsen MB; Seitz K
    Ultraschall Med; 2016 Aug; 37(4):343-5. PubMed ID: 27490462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The effectiveness of journals as arbiters of scientific impact.
    Paine CET; Fox CW
    Ecol Evol; 2018 Oct; 8(19):9566-9585. PubMed ID: 30386557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Early editorial manuscript screening versus obligate peer review: a randomized trial.
    Johnston SC; Lowenstein DH; Ferriero DM; Messing RO; Oksenberg JR; Hauser SL
    Ann Neurol; 2007 Apr; 61(4):A10-2. PubMed ID: 17444512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Fate of Manuscripts Rejected by a Specialty Psychiatry Journal: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Menon V; Jayaprakashan KP; Varadharajan N; Ameen S; Praharaj SK
    Indian J Psychol Med; 2022 Sep; 44(5):493-498. PubMed ID: 36157014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Manuscript rejection in ophthalmology and visual science journals: identifying and avoiding the common pitfalls.
    Wyness T; McGhee CNj; Patel DV
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2009 Dec; 37(9):864-7. PubMed ID: 20092595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Fate of rejected manuscripts in the journal Medicina Intensiva during 2015-2017 period.
    García-Garmendia JL; Gordo-Vidal F; Leal-Noval SR; Amaya-Villar R; Raimondi N; Ochagavía-Calvo A; Garnacho-Montero J
    Med Intensiva (Engl Ed); 2021; 45(5):271-279. PubMed ID: 33509644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. If At First You Don't Succeed: The Fate of Manuscripts Rejected by Academic Emergency Medicine.
    Grant WD; Cone DC
    Acad Emerg Med; 2015 Oct; 22(10):1213-7. PubMed ID: 26394160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Journal prestige, publication bias, and other characteristics associated with citation of published studies in peer-reviewed journals.
    Callaham M; Wears RL; Weber E
    JAMA; 2002 Jun; 287(21):2847-50. PubMed ID: 12038930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. What feedback do reviewers give when reviewing qualitative manuscripts? A focused mapping review and synthesis.
    Herber OR; Bradbury-Jones C; Böling S; Combes S; Hirt J; Koop Y; Nyhagen R; Veldhuizen JD; Taylor J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 May; 20(1):122. PubMed ID: 32423388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. How do reviewers affect the final outcome? Comparison of the quality of peer review and relative acceptance rates of submitted manuscripts.
    Kurihara Y; Colletti PM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Sep; 201(3):468-70. PubMed ID: 23971437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [The ultimate fate of articles rejected for publication in the Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde].
    Koene HR; Overbeke AJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1994 Dec; 138(49):2443-6. PubMed ID: 7997300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Blinded vs. unblinded peer review of manuscripts submitted to a dermatology journal: a randomized multi-rater study.
    Alam M; Kim NA; Havey J; Rademaker A; Ratner D; Tregre B; West DP; Coleman WP
    Br J Dermatol; 2011 Sep; 165(3):563-7. PubMed ID: 21623749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Predicting future citation counts of scientific manuscripts submitted for publication: a cohort study in transplantology.
    Kossmeier M; Heinze G
    Transpl Int; 2019 Jan; 32(1):6-15. PubMed ID: 29907979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Analysis of submissions, editorial and peer-review process, and outcome of manuscripts submitted to the
    Gupta V; Bhatia R; Pathak M; Ramam M
    Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol; 2020; 86(5):519-525. PubMed ID: 32167071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Deficient editorial practices, perceived quality, and expedient scholarly publishing in a developing nation.
    Bredan A; Tashani O; Bakoush O
    F1000Res; 2023; 12():1173. PubMed ID: 38577226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Effect of acceptance or rejection on the author's evaluation of peer review of medical manuscripts.
    Garfunkel JM; Lawson EE; Hamrick HJ; Ulshen MH
    JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1376-8. PubMed ID: 2304217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Manuscript characteristics associated with the altmetrics score and social media presence: an analysis of seven spine journals.
    Richardson MA; Bernstein DN; Mesfin A
    Spine J; 2021 Apr; 21(4):548-554. PubMed ID: 33189908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. An audit of the editorial process at the
    Fernandes GJ; Pai SA
    Indian J Cancer; 2021; 58(2):165-170. PubMed ID: 34100409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Ultimate publication rate of unpublished manuscripts listed on radiology residency applications at one institution.
    Grimm LJ; Maxfield CM
    Acad Med; 2013 Nov; 88(11):1719-22. PubMed ID: 24072127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Re: Journal Standards - Editor's reply.
    Jolly PD
    N Z Vet J; 2003 Aug; 51(4):199. PubMed ID: 16032326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.