138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35698787)
1. Group sequential methods for the Mann-Whitney parameter.
Nowak CP; Mütze T; Konietschke F
Stat Methods Med Res; 2022 Oct; 31(10):2004-2020. PubMed ID: 35698787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of profile-likelihood-based confidence intervals with other rank-based methods for the two-sample problem in ordered categorical data.
Funatogawa I; Funatogawa T
J Biopharm Stat; 2023 May; 33(3):371-385. PubMed ID: 36533908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Case for omitting tied observations in the two-sample t-test and the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney Test.
McGee M
PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0200837. PubMed ID: 30040850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney odds ratio: A statistical measure for ordinal outcomes such as EDSS.
Howard CW; Zou G; Morrow SA; Fridman S; Racosta JM
Mult Scler Relat Disord; 2022 Mar; 59():103516. PubMed ID: 35123291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sample size formula for general win ratio analysis.
Mao L; Kim K; Miao X
Biometrics; 2022 Sep; 78(3):1257-1268. PubMed ID: 34047366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Causal estimands and confidence intervals associated with Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney tests in randomized experiments.
Fay MP; Brittain EH; Shih JH; Follmann DA; Gabriel EE
Stat Med; 2018 Sep; 37(20):2923-2937. PubMed ID: 29774591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimal sample size planning for the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test.
Happ M; Bathke AC; Brunner E
Stat Med; 2019 Feb; 38(3):363-375. PubMed ID: 30298671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Parametric and nonparametric methods for confidence intervals and sample size planning for win probability in parallel-group randomized trials with Likert item and Likert scale data.
Zou G; Zou L; Qiu SF
Pharm Stat; 2023; 22(3):418-439. PubMed ID: 36524672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Confidence intervals of the Mann-Whitney parameter that are compatible with the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test.
Fay MP; Malinovsky Y
Stat Med; 2018 Nov; 37(27):3991-4006. PubMed ID: 29984411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A win ratio approach to comparing continuous non-normal outcomes in clinical trials.
Wang D; Pocock S
Pharm Stat; 2016 May; 15(3):238-45. PubMed ID: 26970432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Size and power estimation for the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test for ordered categorical data.
Tang Y
Stat Med; 2011 Dec; 30(29):3461-70. PubMed ID: 22086799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A "placement of death" approach for studies of treatment effects on ICU length of stay.
Lin W; Halpern SD; Prasad Kerlin M; Small DS
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Feb; 26(1):292-311. PubMed ID: 25085115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Group sequential monitoring of distribution-free analyses of repeated measures.
Lachin JM
Stat Med; 1997 Mar; 16(6):653-68. PubMed ID: 9131754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sample size determination for testing whether an identified treatment is best.
Horn M; Vollandt R; Dunnett CW
Biometrics; 2000 Sep; 56(3):879-81. PubMed ID: 10985230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sample size calculation for the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test adjusting for ties.
Zhao YD; Rahardja D; Qu Y
Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(3):462-8. PubMed ID: 17487941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An optimal Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test of mortality and a continuous outcome.
Matsouaka RA; Singhal AB; Betensky RA
Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Aug; 27(8):2384-2400. PubMed ID: 27920364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Power and sample size calculation for the win odds test: application to an ordinal endpoint in COVID-19 trials.
Gasparyan SB; Kowalewski EK; Folkvaljon F; Bengtsson O; Buenconsejo J; Adler J; Koch GG
J Biopharm Stat; 2021 Nov; 31(6):765-787. PubMed ID: 34551682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A simulation study for comparing testing statistics in response-adaptive randomization.
Gu X; Lee JJ
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Jun; 10():48. PubMed ID: 20525382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sample size estimation for the van Elteren test--a stratified Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test.
Zhao YD
Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(15):2675-87. PubMed ID: 16372389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test under scrutiny.
Fagerland MW; Sandvik L
Stat Med; 2009 May; 28(10):1487-97. PubMed ID: 19247980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
