These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35698863)

  • 1. Using pooled data for genomic prediction in a bivariate framework with missing data.
    Baller JL; Kachman SD; Kuehn LA; Spangler ML
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2022 Sep; 139(5):489-501. PubMed ID: 35698863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Genomic prediction using pooled data in a single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction framework.
    Baller JL; Kachman SD; Kuehn LA; Spangler ML
    J Anim Sci; 2020 Jun; 98(6):. PubMed ID: 32497209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development of genomic predictions for Angus cattle in Brazil incorporating genotypes from related American sires.
    Campos GS; Cardoso FF; Gomes CCG; Domingues R; de Almeida Regitano LC; de Sena Oliveira MC; de Oliveira HN; Carvalheiro R; Albuquerque LG; Miller S; Misztal I; Lourenco D
    J Anim Sci; 2022 Feb; 100(2):. PubMed ID: 35031806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of overlapping DNA pools to discern genetic differences despite pooling error.
    Keele JW; McDaneld TG; Kuehn LA
    J Anim Sci; 2023 Jan; 101():. PubMed ID: 37227930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genomic prediction ability for beef fatty acid profile in Nelore cattle using different pseudo-phenotypes.
    Chiaia HLJ; Peripolli E; de Oliveira Silva RM; Feitosa FLB; de Lemos MVA; Berton MP; Olivieri BF; Espigolan R; Tonussi RL; Gordo DGM; de Albuquerque LG; de Oliveira HN; Ferrinho AM; Mueller LF; Kluska S; Tonhati H; Pereira ASC; Aguilar I; Baldi F
    J Appl Genet; 2018 Nov; 59(4):493-501. PubMed ID: 30251238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. International single-step SNPBLUP beef cattle evaluations for Limousin weaning weight.
    Bonifazi R; Calus MPL; Ten Napel J; Veerkamp RF; Michenet A; Savoia S; Cromie A; Vandenplas J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2022 Sep; 54(1):57. PubMed ID: 36057564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Strategies for accommodating gene-edited sires and their descendants in genetic evaluations.
    Sanglard LP; See GM; Spangler ML
    J Anim Sci; 2023 Jan; 101():. PubMed ID: 36897830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In silico validation of pooled genotyping strategies for genomic evaluation in Angus cattle.
    Alexandre PA; Reverter A; Lehnert SA; Porto-Neto LR; Dominik S
    J Anim Sci; 2020 Jun; 98(6):. PubMed ID: 32428206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pooled genotyping strategies for the rapid construction of genomic reference populations1.
    Alexandre PA; Porto-Neto LR; Karaman E; Lehnert SA; Reverter A
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Dec; 97(12):4761-4769. PubMed ID: 31710679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of selective genotyping on the response to selection using single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction.
    Howard JT; Rathje TA; Bruns CE; Wilson-Wells DF; Kachman SD; Spangler ML
    J Anim Sci; 2018 Nov; 96(11):4532-4542. PubMed ID: 30107560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detecting effective starting point of genomic selection by divergent trends from best linear unbiased prediction and single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction in pigs, beef cattle, and broilers.
    Abdollahi-Arpanahi R; Lourenco D; Misztal I
    J Anim Sci; 2021 Sep; 99(9):. PubMed ID: 34390341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genomic prediction of milk-production traits and somatic cell score using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor with random regression test-day model in Thai dairy cattle.
    Buaban S; Prempree S; Sumreddee P; Duangjinda M; Masuda Y
    J Dairy Sci; 2021 Dec; 104(12):12713-12723. PubMed ID: 34538484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prediction accuracies and genetic parameters for test-day traits from genomic and pedigree-based random regression models with or without heat stress interactions.
    Bohlouli M; Alijani S; Naderi S; Yin T; König S
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Jan; 102(1):488-502. PubMed ID: 30343923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of clustering methods for cross-validation, choice of phenotypes, and genotyping strategies on the accuracy of genomic predictions.
    Baller JL; Howard JT; Kachman SD; Spangler ML
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Apr; 97(4):1534-1549. PubMed ID: 30721970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cow genotyping strategies for genomic selection in a small dairy cattle population.
    Jenko J; Wiggans GR; Cooper TA; Eaglen SAE; Luff WGL; Bichard M; Pong-Wong R; Woolliams JA
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Jan; 100(1):439-452. PubMed ID: 27837974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Integration of beef cattle international pedigree and genomic estimated breeding values into national evaluations, with an application to the Italian Limousin population.
    Bonifazi R; Calus MPL; Ten Napel J; Veerkamp RF; Biffani S; Cassandro M; Savoia S; Vandenplas J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2023 Jun; 55(1):41. PubMed ID: 37308814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A mating advice system in dairy cattle incorporating genomic information.
    Carthy TR; McCarthy J; Berry DP
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Sep; 102(9):8210-8220. PubMed ID: 31229287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of reducing the frequency of animals genotyped at higher density on imputation and prediction accuracies using ssGBLUP1.
    Sollero BP; Howard JT; Spangler ML
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Jul; 97(7):2780-2792. PubMed ID: 31115442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of GEBV of sires based on pooled allele frequency of their progeny.
    Vargas Jurado N; Kuehn LA; Keele JW; Lewis RM
    G3 (Bethesda); 2021 Oct; 11(11):. PubMed ID: 34510188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prediction accuracy for a simulated maternally affected trait of beef cattle using different genomic evaluation models.
    Lourenco DA; Misztal I; Wang H; Aguilar I; Tsuruta S; Bertrand JK
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Sep; 91(9):4090-8. PubMed ID: 23893997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.