BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35699217)

  • 21. Medical devices; substantial equivalence; 510(K) summaries and 510(K) statements; class III summaries; confidentiality of information--FDA. Final rule.
    Fed Regist; 1994 Dec; 59(239):64287-96. PubMed ID: 10139433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Medical devices; exemption from premarket notification and reserved devices; class I. Food and Drug Administration, HHS. Final rule.
    Fed Regist; 2000 Jan; 65(10):2296-323. PubMed ID: 11010655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Recalls of Moderate- and High-Risk Otolaryngologic Devices Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, 2003-2019.
    Talati IA; Parsa KM; Gao WZ
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2022 Nov; 167(5):832-838. PubMed ID: 35290135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Regulatory issues relating to therapies for periodontal regeneration.
    Singleton DG; Torres-Cabassa A
    Ann Periodontol; 1997 Mar; 2(1):223-8. PubMed ID: 9151556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Selective reporting in trials of high risk cardiovascular devices: cross sectional comparison between premarket approval summaries and published reports.
    Chang L; Dhruva SS; Chu J; Bero LA; Redberg RF
    BMJ; 2015 Jun; 350():h2613. PubMed ID: 26063311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Medical devices; exemption from premarket notification and reserved devices; Class I--FDA. Proposed rule.
    Fed Regist; 1998 Nov; 63(218):63222-53. PubMed ID: 10187398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Medical devices; exemption from premarket notification; class II devices; wheelchair elevator. Final order.
    Food and Drug Administration, HHS
    Fed Regist; 2013 Mar; 78(42):14013-5. PubMed ID: 23476998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Food and Drug Association Approval Process for Devices Used in Endovascular Treatment of Stroke.
    Gangadhara S; Siddiqui A; Mokin M
    Neurology; 2021 Nov; 97(20 Suppl 2):S194-S200. PubMed ID: 34785618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Substantial Equivalence Premarket Review: the Right Approach for Most Medical Devices.
    Shapiro JK
    Food Drug Law J; 2014; 69(3):365-97, i. PubMed ID: 27382855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. FDA approval of cardiac implantable electronic devices via original and supplement premarket approval pathways, 1979-2012.
    Rome BN; Kramer DB; Kesselheim AS
    JAMA; 2014 Jan 22-29; 311(4):385-91. PubMed ID: 24449317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Medical devices; exemption from premarket notification; class II devices; powered patient transport. Final order.
    Food and Drug Administration, HHS
    Fed Regist; 2013 Mar; 78(42):14015-7. PubMed ID: 23476999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Time to publication of cost-effectiveness analyses for medical devices.
    Everhart AO
    Am J Manag Care; 2023 May; 29(5):265-268. PubMed ID: 37229785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Orthopaedic Device Approval Through the Premarket Approval Process: A Financial Feasibility Analysis for a Single Center.
    Yang BW; Iorio ML; Day CS
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 Mar; 99(6):e26. PubMed ID: 28291189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) 510(k) Process: A Systematic Review of 1000 Cases.
    Shah P; Olavarria O; Dhanani N; Ciomperlik H; Mohr C; Bernardi K; Neela N; Coelho R; Ali Z; Prabhu A; Liang MK
    Am J Med; 2023 Feb; 136(2):172-178.e14. PubMed ID: 36170936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. FDA recognition of consensus standards in the premarket notification program.
    Marlowe DE; Phillips PJ
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 1998; 32(3):301-4. PubMed ID: 9619259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Approval process for devices and mesh for surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence.
    Nygaard I
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jun; 56(2):229-31. PubMed ID: 23632639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Use of Recalled Devices in New Device Authorizations Under the US Food and Drug Administration's 510(k) Pathway and Risk of Subsequent Recalls.
    Kadakia KT; Dhruva SS; Caraballo C; Ross JS; Krumholz HM
    JAMA; 2023 Jan; 329(2):136-143. PubMed ID: 36625810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Medical devices; procedures for premarket notification, premarket approval, classification, performance standards establishment, banning devices, and availability of regulatory hearings--FDA. Final rule.
    Fed Regist; 1992 Dec; 57(238):58400-6. PubMed ID: 10123143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The FDA and Ensuring Safety and Effectiveness of Devices, Biologics, and Technology.
    Dubin JR; Ibad H; Cil A; Murray M
    J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2022 Jul; 30(14):658-667. PubMed ID: 35797679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Clinical Evidence Supporting US Food and Drug Administration Premarket Approval of High-Risk Otolaryngologic Devices, 2000-2014.
    Rathi VK; Wang B; Ross JS; Downing NS; Kesselheim AS; Gray ST
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Feb; 156(2):285-288. PubMed ID: 28093943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.