187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35699297)
1. Abortion laws in the United States: Turning the calendar back 50 years?
Macklin R
Indian J Med Ethics; 2022; VII(3):175-178. PubMed ID: 35699297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Beyond Roe, after Casey: the present and future of a "fundamental" right.
Benshoof J
Womens Health Issues; 1993; 3(3):162-70. PubMed ID: 8274872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The laws that affect abortion in the United States and their impact on women's health.
Harrison LK; Naylor KL
Nurse Pract; 1991 Dec; 16(12):53-9. PubMed ID: 1798604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Abortion and legal process in the United States: an overview of the post-Webster legal landscape.
Baron CH
Law Med Health Care; 1989; 17(4):368-75. PubMed ID: 2628652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Abortion Access for Women in Custody in the Wake of
Herr A
Am J Law Med; 2023 Dec; 49(4):471-492. PubMed ID: 38563269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Restricting Reasons: A New Battleground in Abortion Regulation.
Will JF
Hastings Cent Rep; 2020 Sep; 50(5):7-8. PubMed ID: 33095492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Webster versus reproductive health services.
Rhodes AM
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 1989; 14(6):423. PubMed ID: 2514333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Court lifts ban on enforcing Miss. anti-abortion law.
Denniston L
Sun; 1992 Aug; ():3A. PubMed ID: 12286287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of women in abortion jurisprudence: from Roe to Casey and beyond.
Martin PA
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1993; 2(3):309-19. PubMed ID: 8293219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Implications of the Federal Abortion Ban for Women's Health in the United States.
Weitz TA; Yanow S
Reprod Health Matters; 2008 May; 16(31 Suppl):99-107. PubMed ID: 18772090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Abortion: a history.
Hovey G
Plan Parent Rev; 1985; 5(2):18-21. PubMed ID: 12340403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Trends in Abortion- and Contraception-Related Internet Searches After the US Supreme Court Overturned Constitutional Abortion Rights: How Much Do State Laws Matter?
Gupta S; Perry B; Simon K
JAMA Health Forum; 2023 Apr; 4(4):e230518. PubMed ID: 37115538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Women's reproductive health.
Rosenfield A
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jul; 169(1):128-33. PubMed ID: 8333437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Roe v. Wade. Revisiting the fundamentals.
Benshoof J
Conscience; 1998; 18(4):16-7. PubMed ID: 12178876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of the Human Genome Initiative on women's rights and reproductive decisions.
Charo RA
Fetal Diagn Ther; 1993 Apr; 8(Suppl. 1):148-59. PubMed ID: 11653014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The road to moderation: the significance of Webster for legislation restricting abortion.
Wardle LD
Law Med Health Care; 1989; 17(4):376-83. PubMed ID: 2628653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Medication Abortion Through Telemedicine: Implications of a Ruling by the Iowa Supreme Court.
Yang YT; Kozhimannil KB
Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 127(2):313-6. PubMed ID: 26942359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Anti-abortion movement.
Wilson K
Plan Parent Rev; 1985; 5(2):4-6. PubMed ID: 12340405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Abortion access in the Americas: a hemispheric and historical approach.
Roth C
Front Public Health; 2023; 11():1284737. PubMed ID: 38125840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Federalism, two-level games and the politics of abortion rights implementation in subnational Argentina.
Ruibal A
Reprod Health Matters; 2018 Nov; 26(54):137-144. PubMed ID: 30427282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
