249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35699577)
21. Deep learning assessment compared to radiologist reporting for metastatic spinal cord compression on CT.
Hallinan JTPD; Zhu L; Zhang W; Ge S; Muhamat Nor FE; Ong HY; Eide SE; Cheng AJL; Kuah T; Lim DSW; Low XZ; Yeong KY; AlMuhaish MI; Alsooreti AM; Kumarakulasinghe NB; Teo EC; Yap QV; Chan YH; Lin S; Tan JH; Kumar N; Vellayappan BA; Ooi BC; Quek ST; Makmur A
Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1151073. PubMed ID: 37213273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Reliability Analysis of Deep Learning Algorithms for Reporting of Routine Lumbar MRI Scans.
Lewandrowski KU; Muraleedharan N; Eddy SA; Sobti V; Reece BD; Ramírez León JF; Shah S
Int J Spine Surg; 2020 Dec; 14(s3):S98-S107. PubMed ID: 33122182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Is multidetector computed tomography comparable to magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of lumbar foraminal stenosis?
Kang WY; Ahn JM; Lee JW; Lee E; Bae YJ; Seo J; Kim J; Kang HS
Acta Radiol; 2017 Feb; 58(2):197-203. PubMed ID: 27055917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The Effect of Computer-Assisted Reporting on Interreader Variability of Lumbar Spine MRI Degenerative Findings: Five Readers With 30 Disc Levels.
Wang B; Rosenthal DI; Xu C; Pandharipande PV; Harvey HB; Alkasab TK; Huang AJ
J Am Coll Radiol; 2018 Nov; 15(11):1613-1619. PubMed ID: 29467092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Correlation of listhesis on upright radiographs and central lumbar spinal canal stenosis on supine MRI: is it possible to predict lumbar spinal canal stenosis?
Finkenstaedt T; Del Grande F; Bolog N; Ulrich NH; Tok S; Burgstaller JM; Steurer J; Chung CB; Andreisek G; Winklhofer S;
Skeletal Radiol; 2018 Sep; 47(9):1269-1275. PubMed ID: 29651713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Could automated machine-learned MRI grading aid epidemiological studies of lumbar spinal stenosis? Validation within the Wakayama spine study.
Ishimoto Y; Jamaludin A; Cooper C; Walker-Bone K; Yamada H; Hashizume H; Oka H; Tanaka S; Yoshimura N; Yoshida M; Urban J; Kadir T; Fairbank J
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Mar; 21(1):158. PubMed ID: 32164627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Clinical correlation of a new MR imaging method for assessing lumbar foraminal stenosis.
Park HJ; Kim SS; Lee SY; Park NH; Rho MH; Hong HP; Kwag HJ; Kook SH; Choi SH
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2012 May; 33(5):818-22. PubMed ID: 22241383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Deep learning reconstruction for the evaluation of neuroforaminal stenosis using 1.5T cervical spine MRI: comparison with 3T MRI without deep learning reconstruction.
Yasaka K; Tanishima T; Ohtake Y; Tajima T; Akai H; Ohtomo K; Abe O; Kiryu S
Neuroradiology; 2022 Oct; 64(10):2077-2083. PubMed ID: 35918450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effects of age and sex on the distribution and symmetry of lumbar spinal and neural foraminal stenosis: a natural language processing analysis of 43,255 lumbar MRI reports.
Travis Caton M; Wiggins WF; Pomerantz SR; Andriole KP
Neuroradiology; 2021 Jun; 63(6):959-966. PubMed ID: 33594502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A practical MRI grading system for lumbar foraminal stenosis.
Lee S; Lee JW; Yeom JS; Kim KJ; Kim HJ; Chung SK; Kang HS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Apr; 194(4):1095-8. PubMed ID: 20308517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A practical MRI grading system for cervical foraminal stenosis based on oblique sagittal images.
Park HJ; Kim SS; Lee SY; Park NH; Chung EC; Rho MH; Kwon HJ; Kook SH
Br J Radiol; 2013 May; 86(1025):20120515. PubMed ID: 23410800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Mechanical Low Back Pain Using a Novel Rapid-Acquisition Three-Dimensional SPACE Sequence at 1.5-T: A Pilot Study Comparing Lumbar Stenosis Assessment With Routine Two-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Sequences.
Swami VG; Katlariwala M; Dhillon S; Jibri Z; Jaremko JL
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2016 Nov; 67(4):368-378. PubMed ID: 27245289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The Haleem-Botchu classification: a novel CT-based classification for lumbar foraminal stenosis.
Haleem S; Malik M; Guduri V; Azzopardi C; James S; Botchu R
Eur Spine J; 2021 Apr; 30(4):865-869. PubMed ID: 33179129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. External validation of the deep learning system "SpineNet" for grading radiological features of degeneration on MRIs of the lumbar spine.
Grob A; Loibl M; Jamaludin A; Winklhofer S; Fairbank JCT; Fekete T; Porchet F; Mannion AF
Eur Spine J; 2022 Aug; 31(8):2137-2148. PubMed ID: 35835892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Grading Systems for Central Canal and Neural Foraminal Stenoses of the Lumbar and Cervical Spines With a Focus on the Lee Grading System.
Seo J; Lee JW
Korean J Radiol; 2023 Mar; 24(3):224-234. PubMed ID: 36788771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Interrater and intrarater agreements of magnetic resonance imaging findings in the lumbar spine: significant variability across degenerative conditions.
Fu MC; Buerba RA; Long WD; Blizzard DJ; Lischuk AW; Haims AH; Grauer JN
Spine J; 2014 Oct; 14(10):2442-8. PubMed ID: 24642053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Deep Learning Model for Classifying Metastatic Epidural Spinal Cord Compression on MRI.
Hallinan JTPD; Zhu L; Zhang W; Lim DSW; Baskar S; Low XZ; Yeong KY; Teo EC; Kumarakulasinghe NB; Yap QV; Chan YH; Lin S; Tan JH; Kumar N; Vellayappan BA; Ooi BC; Quek ST; Makmur A
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():849447. PubMed ID: 35600347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Reliability of readings of magnetic resonance imaging features of lumbar spinal stenosis.
Lurie JD; Tosteson AN; Tosteson TD; Carragee E; Carrino JA; Kaiser J; Sequeiros RT; Lecomte AR; Grove MR; Blood EA; Pearson LH; Weinstein JN; Herzog R
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jun; 33(14):1605-10. PubMed ID: 18552677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A new comprehensive MRI classification and grading system for lumbosacral central and lateral stenosis: clinical application and comparison with previous systems.
Spinnato P; Petrera MR; Parmeggiani A; Manzetti M; Ruffilli A; Faldini C; D'Agostino V; Di Carlo M; Cumani MP; Crombé A; Matcuk GR; Miceli M
Radiol Med; 2024 Jan; 129(1):93-106. PubMed ID: 37882917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Factors affecting dynamic foraminal stenosis in the lumbar spine.
Singh V; Montgomery SR; Aghdasi B; Inoue H; Wang JC; Daubs MD
Spine J; 2013 Sep; 13(9):1080-7. PubMed ID: 23669126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
