These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35700685)

  • 21. Driver Behavior During Overtaking Maneuvers from the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study.
    Chen R; Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S176-81. PubMed ID: 26436229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Modeling Car-Following Behaviors and Driving Styles with Generative Adversarial Imitation Learning.
    Zhou Y; Fu R; Wang C; Zhang R
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Sep; 20(18):. PubMed ID: 32899773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Development of freeway-based test scenarios for applying new car assessment program to automated vehicles.
    Ko W; Park S; Park S; Jeong H; Yun I
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(7):e0271532. PubMed ID: 35862304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Efficiency performance and safety evaluation of the responsibility-sensitive safety in freeway car-following scenarios using automated longitudinal controls.
    Hassanin O; Wang X; Wu X; Xu X
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Nov; 177():106799. PubMed ID: 36081222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Towards social autonomous vehicles: Efficient collision avoidance scheme using Richardson's arms race model.
    Riaz F; Niazi MA
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0186103. PubMed ID: 29040294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Human-like Decision Making for Autonomous Vehicles at the Intersection Using Inverse Reinforcement Learning.
    Wu Z; Qu F; Yang L; Gong J
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jun; 22(12):. PubMed ID: 35746281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Safe Driving Distance and Speed for Collision Avoidance in Connected Vehicles.
    Elsagheer Mohamed SA; Alshalfan KA; Al-Hagery MA; Ben Othman MT
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Sep; 22(18):. PubMed ID: 36146401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Crash comparison of autonomous and conventional vehicles using pre-crash scenario typology.
    Liu Q; Wang X; Wu X; Glaser Y; He L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Sep; 159():106281. PubMed ID: 34273622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A Control Method with Reinforcement Learning for Urban Un-Signalized Intersection in Hybrid Traffic Environment.
    Shi Y; Liu Y; Qi Y; Han Q
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jan; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 35161523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Collision-avoidance lane change control method for enhancing safety for connected vehicle platoon in mixed traffic environment.
    Ma Y; Liu Q; Fu J; Liufu K; Li Q
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 May; 184():106999. PubMed ID: 36780868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Quantifying the Impact of Deployments of Autonomous Vehicles and Intelligent Roads on Road Safety in China: A Country-Level Modeling Study.
    Tan H; Zhao F; Song H; Liu Z
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Feb; 20(5):. PubMed ID: 36901079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Towards human-like speed control in autonomous vehicles: A mountainous freeway case.
    Chen Z; Wang X; Guo Q; Tarko A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Mar; 166():106566. PubMed ID: 35026555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Detection and Risk Analysis with Lane-Changing Decision Algorithms for Autonomous Vehicles.
    Mechernene A; Judalet V; Chaibet A; Boukhnifer M
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Oct; 22(21):. PubMed ID: 36365846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A fundamental experimental approach for optimal design of speed bumps.
    Lav AH; Bilgin E; Lav AH
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jul; 116():53-68. PubMed ID: 28583281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Exploring the associations between driving volatility and autonomous vehicle hazardous scenarios: Insights from field operational test data.
    Yu R; Li S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Mar; 166():106537. PubMed ID: 34952369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A Decision-Making Strategy for Car Following Based on Naturalist Driving Data via Deep Reinforcement Learning.
    Li W; Zhang Y; Shi X; Qiu F
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Oct; 22(20):. PubMed ID: 36298405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Learning-Based Adaptive Optimal Control for Connected Vehicles in Mixed Traffic: Robustness to Driver Reaction Time.
    Huang M; Jiang ZP; Ozbay K
    IEEE Trans Cybern; 2022 Jun; 52(6):5267-5277. PubMed ID: 33170792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A visual approach towards forward collision warning for autonomous vehicles on Malaysian public roads.
    Wong MK; Connie T; Goh MKO; Wong LP; Teh PS; Choo AL
    F1000Res; 2021; 10():928. PubMed ID: 35350706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Impact Evaluation of Cyberattacks on Connected and Automated Vehicles in Mixed Traffic Flow and Its Resilient and Robust Control Strategy.
    Wang T; Tu M; Lyu H; Li Y; Orfila O; Zou G; Gruyer D
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Dec; 23(1):. PubMed ID: 36616672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Optimizing the safety-efficiency balancing of automated vehicle car-following.
    Liu X; Shen D; Lai L; Le Vine S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Mar; 136():105435. PubMed ID: 31935600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.