169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35700925)
1. Impact of technology-assisted versus manual sterile compounding on safety and efficiency in a Canadian community hospital.
Fan M; Yang D; Ng B; Jackson J; Bouris K; Eng S; Rolko E; Trbovich P
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2022 Sep; 79(19):1685-1696. PubMed ID: 35700925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Utilization of a technology-assisted workflow to prepare controlled substance oral syringes.
Nester T; Proffitt K; Anderson J; Hays A; Eidem L; Greszler C
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2023 Aug; 80(16):1063-1070. PubMed ID: 37210711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of a gravimetric-based technology-assisted workflow system on hazardous sterile product preparation.
Roberts PA; Willoughby IR; Barnes N; Eckel SF; Paruscio A; Valgus JM; Amerine LB
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2018 Sep; 75(17):1286-1292. PubMed ID: 30139736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of telepharmacy and the use of a gravimetric technology-assisted workflow system for remote sterile product pharmacist checks.
Jean SJ; Francart SJ; Eckel SF; Schenkat D; Eberwein S; Lamm M; Barnes N; Valgus JM; Amerine LB
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2020 Mar; 77(7):560-567. PubMed ID: 32086506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of gravimetric-based technology-assisted workflow for nonhazardous sterile product preparation.
Bucci TG; Hedrick TL; Roberts PA; Lin K; South MD; Willoughby IR; Eckel SF; Hess ET; Eberwein S; Amerine LB
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2019 Jul; 76(14):1071-1077. PubMed ID: 31361879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multicenter study to evaluate the benefits of technology-assisted workflow on i.v. room efficiency, costs, and safety.
Eckel SF; Higgins JP; Hess E; Cerbone T; Civiello JB; Conley C; Jafari N; Shah S; Speth SL; Thornton L
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2019 Jun; 76(12):895-901. PubMed ID: 31361850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating An Automated Compounding Workflow Software for Safety and Efficiency: Implementation Study.
Meren ÜH; Waterson J
JMIR Hum Factors; 2021 Nov; 8(4):e29180. PubMed ID: 34456182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multicenter study to evaluate the benefits of technology-assisted workflow on i.v. room efficiency, costs, and safety in small community hospitals.
Higgins JP; Hardt S; Cowan D; Beasley E; Eckel SF
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2019 Jun; 76(13):964-969. PubMed ID: 31361882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sterile product compounding using an i.v. compounding workflow management system at a pediatric hospital.
Moniz TT; Chu S; Tom C; Lutz P; Arnold A; Gura KM; Patterson A
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2014 Aug; 71(15):1311-7. PubMed ID: 25027539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Implementation and evaluation of a gravimetric i.v. workflow software system in an oncology ambulatory care pharmacy.
Reece KM; Lozano MA; Roux R; Spivey SM
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2016 Feb; 73(3):165-73. PubMed ID: 26796911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of IV oncology infusions compounded via robotics and gravimetrics-assisted workflow processes.
Pang B; Earl M; Knoer S; Yaniv A; Willner M; Boyd A
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2021 Jan; 78(2):122-134. PubMed ID: 33064792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Survey of sterile product compounding practices in Canadian hospital pharmacies.
Fitch DP; Hall KW
Can J Hosp Pharm; 1993 Dec; 46(6):249-60. PubMed ID: 10131343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intravenous Chemotherapy Compounding Errors in a Follow-Up Pan-Canadian Observational Study.
Gilbert RE; Kozak MC; Dobish RB; Bourrier VC; Koke PM; Kukreti V; Logan HA; Easty AC; Trbovich PL
J Oncol Pract; 2018 May; 14(5):e295-e303. PubMed ID: 29676947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automated compounding technology and workflow solutions for the preparation of chemotherapy: a systematic review.
Batson S; Mitchell SA; Lau D; Canobbio M; de Goede A; Singh I; Loesch U
Eur J Hosp Pharm; 2020 Nov; 27(6):330-336. PubMed ID: 33097615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Teaching and Assessing Pharmacy Students on Sterile Compounding Accuracy Checks.
Wisniewski JN
Am J Pharm Educ; 2023 Apr; 87(4):ajpe9042. PubMed ID: 36375848
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Risk factors for i.v. compounding errors when using an automated workflow management system.
Deng Y; Lin AC; Hingl J; Huang G; Altaye M; Maynard H; Mayhaus D; Penm J
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2016 Jun; 73(12):887-93. PubMed ID: 27261239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robotic compounding versus manual compounding of chemotherapy: Comparing dosing accuracy and precision.
Geersing TH; Klous MG; Franssen EJF; van den Heuvel JJG; Crul M
Eur J Pharm Sci; 2020 Dec; 155():105536. PubMed ID: 32877721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Contribution of an anticancer drug compounding robot in reducing the risks of manual preparation in a hospital pharmacy unit specialized in oncology.
Cherif Chefchaouni A; Boudina Y; Chennaq M; Belahcen MJ; Rahali Y
J Oncol Pharm Pract; 2023 Sep; 29(6):1334-1342. PubMed ID: 35938183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Guidelines for the Safe Preparation of Sterile Compounds: Results of the ISMP Sterile Preparation Compounding Safety Summit of October 2011.
Rich DS; Fricker MP; Cohen MR; Levine SR
Hosp Pharm; 2013 Apr; 48(4):282-94. PubMed ID: 24421477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Errors detected in pediatric oral liquid medication doses prepared in an automated workflow management system.
Bledsoe S; Van Buskirk A; Falconer RJ; Hollon A; Hoebing W; Jokic S
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2018 Feb; 75(3):127-131. PubMed ID: 29371193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
