BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35701639)

  • 21. Cardiotocography plus ST analysis of fetal electrocardiogram compared with cardiotocography only for intrapartum monitoring: a randomized controlled trial.
    Westerhuis MEMH; Visser GHA; Moons KGM; van Beek E; Benders MJ; Bijvoet SM; van Dessel HJHM; Drogtrop AP; van Geijn HP; Graziosi GC; Groenendaal F; van Lith JMM; Nijhuis JG; Oei SG; Oosterbaan HP; Porath MM; Rijnders RJP; Schuitemaker NWE; Sopacua LM; van der Tweel I; Wijnberger LDE; Willekes C; Zuithoff NPA; Mol BWJ; Kwee A
    Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jun; 115(6):1173-1180. PubMed ID: 20502287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Randomised trial of cardiotocography alone or with ST waveform analysis for intrapartum monitoring.
    Westgate J; Harris M; Curnow JS; Greene KR
    Lancet; 1992 Jul; 340(8813):194-8. PubMed ID: 1353134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The use of STAN monitoring in the labour ward.
    Ragupathy K; Ismail F; Nicoll AE
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2010; 30(5):465-9. PubMed ID: 20604648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. New FIGO and Swedish intrapartum cardiotocography classification systems incorporated in the fetal ECG ST analysis (STAN) interpretation algorithm: agreements and discrepancies in cardiotocography classification and evaluation of significant ST events.
    Olofsson P; Norén H; Carlsson A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2018 Feb; 97(2):219-228. PubMed ID: 29215160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Review of the first 1502 cases of ECG-ST waveform analysis during labour in a teaching hospital.
    Doria V; Papageorghiou AT; Gustafsson A; Ugwumadu A; Farrer K; Arulkumaran S
    BJOG; 2007 Oct; 114(10):1202-7. PubMed ID: 17877672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Perinatal and Neonatal Outcomes Using Cardiotocography Versus STAN and Cardiotocography: a Systematic Review.
    Tsiligkeridou S; Bolou A; Xanthos T; Gourounti K
    Maedica (Bucur); 2023 Dec; 18(4):684-691. PubMed ID: 38348066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A randomised clinical trial of intrapartum fetal monitoring with computer analysis and alerts versus previously available monitoring.
    Ayres-de-Campos D; Ugwumadu A; Banfield P; Lynch P; Amin P; Horwell D; Costa A; Santos C; Bernardes J; Rosen K
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2010 Oct; 10():71. PubMed ID: 21029466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The importance of the learning process in ST analysis interpretation and its impact in improving clinical and neonatal outcomes.
    Timonen S; Holmberg K
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 218(6):620.e1-620.e7. PubMed ID: 29577914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. National survey of routines for intrapartum fetal monitoring in Norway.
    Kaasen A; Aanstad KJ; Pay ASD; Økland I; Blix E
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Mar; 98(3):390-395. PubMed ID: 30375643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. FHR patterns that become significant in connection with ST waveform changes and metabolic acidosis at birth.
    Rosén KG; Norén H; Carlsson A
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Oct; 32(19):3288-3293. PubMed ID: 29621906
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effectiveness of intrapartum fetal surveillance to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Al Wattar BH; Honess E; Bunnewell S; Welton NJ; Quenby S; Khan KS; Zamora J; Thangaratinam S
    CMAJ; 2021 Apr; 193(14):E468-E477. PubMed ID: 33824144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Identification of cases with adverse neonatal outcome monitored by cardiotocography versus ST analysis: secondary analysis of a randomized trial.
    Westerhuis ME; Porath MM; Becker JH; Van Den Akker ES; Van Beek E; Van Dessel HJ; Drogtrop AP; Van Geijn HP; Graziosi GC; Groenendaal F; Van Lith JM; Mol BW; Moons KG; Nijhuis JG; Oei SG; Oosterbaan HP; Rijnders RJ; Schuitemaker NW; Wijnberger LD; Willekes C; Wouters MG; Visser GH; Kwee A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2012 Jul; 91(7):830-7. PubMed ID: 22536843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Does ST analysis have a place in electronic fetal monitoring?
    Turnbull TL; Mol BW; Matthews G; Wilkinson C; Chandraharan E; Kuah S
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Mar; 30(5):520-524. PubMed ID: 27098566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Swedish randomized controlled trial of cardiotocography only versus cardiotocography plus ST analysis of fetal electrocardiogram revisited: analysis of data according to standard versus modified intention-to-treat principle.
    Amer-Wåhlin I; Kjellmer I; Maršál K; Olofsson P; Rosén KG
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2011 Sep; 90(9):990-6. PubMed ID: 21623743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Inter-observer agreement in clinical decision-making for abnormal cardiotocogram (CTG) during labour: a comparison between CTG and CTG plus STAN.
    Vayssière C; Tsatsaris V; Pirrello O; Cristini C; Arnaud C; Goffinet F
    BJOG; 2009 Jul; 116(8):1081-7; discussion 1087-8. PubMed ID: 19515149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram in intrapartum fetal monitoring: a meta-analysis.
    Becker JH; Bax L; Amer-Wåhlin I; Ojala K; Vayssière C; Westerhuis ME; Mol BW; Visser GH; Maršál K; Kwee A; Moons KG
    Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jan; 119(1):145-54. PubMed ID: 22183222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Intrapartum cardiotocography with and without computer analysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Campanile M; D'Alessandro P; Della Corte L; Saccone G; Tagliaferri S; Arduino B; Esposito G; Esposito FG; Raffone A; Signorini MG; Magenes G; Di Tommaso M; Xodo S; Zullo F; Berghella V
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Jul; 33(13):2284-2290. PubMed ID: 30449222
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The impact of the introduction of intrapartum fetal ECG ST segment analysis. A population study.
    Blix E; Eskild A; Skau I; Grytten J
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2022 Jul; 101(7):809-818. PubMed ID: 35288935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Fetal scalp blood sampling during second stage of labor - analyzing lactate or pH? A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.
    Stål I; Wennerholm UB; Nordstrom L; Ladfors L; Wiberg-Itzel E
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Mar; 35(6):1100-1107. PubMed ID: 32233704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Foetal electrocardiograph (ST-analyser or STAN) for intrapartum foetal heart rate monitoring: a friend or a foe?
    Chandraharan E
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2018 Jan; 31(1):123-127. PubMed ID: 28027681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.