These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35701660)

  • 1. When global and local information about attentional demands collide: evidence for global dominance.
    Suh J; Ileri-Tayar M; Bugg JM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Aug; 84(6):1858-1873. PubMed ID: 35701660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of awareness and secondary task demands on Stroop performance in the pre-cued lists paradigm.
    Bugg JM; Diede NT
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Sep; 189():26-35. PubMed ID: 28061943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attentional control adjustments in Eriksen and Stroop task performance can be independent of response conflict.
    Lamers MJ; Roelofs A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jun; 64(6):1056-81. PubMed ID: 21113864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Expectations and experience: Dissociable bases for cognitive control?
    Bugg JM; Diede NT; Cohen-Shikora ER; Selmeczy D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Sep; 41(5):1349-73. PubMed ID: 25689002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spatial Stroop and spatial orienting: the role of onset versus offset cues.
    Luo C; Lupiáñez J; Fu X; Weng X
    Psychol Res; 2010 May; 74(3):277-90. PubMed ID: 19693533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Congruency precues moderate item-specific proportion congruency effects.
    Hutchison KA; Bugg JM; Lim YB; Olsen MR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 May; 78(4):1087-103. PubMed ID: 26860710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Focusing on task conflict in the Stroop effect.
    Entel O; Tzelgov J
    Psychol Res; 2018 Mar; 82(2):284-295. PubMed ID: 27915364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. It is harder than you think: On the boundary conditions of exploiting congruency cues.
    Jiménez L; Méndez C; Abrahamse E; Braem S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Oct; 47(10):1686-1704. PubMed ID: 32297789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attentional control in anterior cingulate cortex based on probabilistic cueing.
    Aarts E; Roelofs A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Mar; 23(3):716-27. PubMed ID: 20146601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Context-specific proportion congruent effects: Compound-cue contingency learning in disguise.
    Schmidt JR; Lemercier C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 May; 72(5):1119-1130. PubMed ID: 29926760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. List-wide control is not entirely elusive: evidence from picture-word Stroop.
    Bugg JM; Chanani S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Oct; 18(5):930-6. PubMed ID: 21638107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exploring relations between task conflict and informational conflict in the Stroop task.
    Entel O; Tzelgov J; Bereby-Meyer Y; Shahar N
    Psychol Res; 2015 Nov; 79(6):913-27. PubMed ID: 25420632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The interactive effects of listwide control, item-based control, and working memory capacity on Stroop performance.
    Hutchison KA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):851-60. PubMed ID: 21517220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pupillary correlates of preparatory control in the Stroop task.
    Unsworth N; Miller AL
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Oct; 85(7):2277-2295. PubMed ID: 37407798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Orchestrating Proactive and Reactive Mechanisms for Filtering Distracting Information: Brain-Behavior Relationships Revealed by a Mixed-Design fMRI Study.
    Marini F; Demeter E; Roberts KC; Chelazzi L; Woldorff MG
    J Neurosci; 2016 Jan; 36(3):988-1000. PubMed ID: 26791226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transfer of learned cognitive control settings within and between tasks.
    Ileri-Tayar M; Moss C; Bugg JM
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2022 Dec; 196():107689. PubMed ID: 36374800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Active inhibition of a distractor word: the distractor precue benefit in the Stroop color-naming task.
    Chao HF
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Jun; 37(3):799-812. PubMed ID: 21480743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preparation and persistence of deploying attention to locations or stimulus structures: Evidence from intermixed probe trials.
    Kähler ST; Wendt M; Dühnen IM; Luna-Rodriguez A; Jacobsen T
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2024 May; 245():104205. PubMed ID: 38493711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Which way is which? Examining global/local processing with symbolic cues.
    Mills M; Dodd MD
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Aug; 143(4):1429-36. PubMed ID: 24684258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Post-error slowing is influenced by cognitive control demand.
    Regev S; Meiran N
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Oct; 152():10-8. PubMed ID: 25089881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.