These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Law-medicine notes. The management of psychiatric patients: courts, patients' representatives, and the refusal of treatment. Curran WJ N Engl J Med; 1980 Jun; 302(23):1297-9. PubMed ID: 7366694 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Guidelines on patients' rights found lacking. Psychiatr News; 1984 Aug; 19(16):1, 18-9. PubMed ID: 10268119 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The right to refuse treatment with antipsychotic medications: retrospect and prospect. Appelbaum PS Am J Psychiatry; 1988 Apr; 145(4):413-9. PubMed ID: 3279829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Human rights and correctional treatment. Ferracuti F Int J Law Psychiatry; 1984; 7(2):215-8. PubMed ID: 6530326 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The diverse goals involved in treatment of the mentally ill. Is a collision inevitable? Daly JL J Leg Med; 1987 Mar; 8(1):49-89. PubMed ID: 3495624 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Rogers v. Commissioner: do multiple "wrongs" make patients' rights? Gutheil TG New Dir Ment Health Serv; 1985 Mar; (25):35-45. PubMed ID: 3990663 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Patients' rights advocates in San Francisco. Binder RL Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1985; 13(4):325-36. PubMed ID: 4074897 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The right to treatment and involuntary commitment. Carroll MA J Med Philos; 1980 Dec; 5(4):278-91. PubMed ID: 7205095 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Decade of litigation has led to redefinition of patients' rights. Weiner BA Hospitals; 1981 May; 55(9):67-70. PubMed ID: 7216209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The right of the psychiatric patient to refuse treatment. Henebery JK Leg Med; 1982; ():137-59. PubMed ID: 7121175 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. How flexible are our civil commitment statutes? Fisher WH; Pierce GL; Appelbaum PS Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1988 Jul; 39(7):711-2. PubMed ID: 3402934 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Titicut Follies: patients' rights and institutional reform. Appelbaum PS Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1989 Jul; 40(7):679-80. PubMed ID: 2777223 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Continuing case law development in the right to refuse treatment. Mills MJ; Yesavage JA; Gutheil TG Am J Psychiatry; 1983 Jun; 140(6):715-9. PubMed ID: 6846630 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The involuntarily confined mentally ill: can they refuse antipsychotic medication? Root GL; Scarano RM Rev Fed Am Health Syst; 1988; 21(3):44, 46. PubMed ID: 10314659 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Restraints and the elderly: when safety and autonomy conflict. Schafer A Can Med Assoc J; 1985 Jun; 132(11):1257-60. PubMed ID: 3995445 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Realism and drug refusal: a reply to Appelbaum and Gutheil. Dix GE Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1981; 9(3):180-98. PubMed ID: 7326443 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Patient autonomy and the refusal of psychotropic medications. Baumgarten E Prog Clin Biol Res; 1983; 139():13-30. PubMed ID: 6669534 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]