These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3570398)

  • 1. Efficacy of screening in preventing invasive cervical cancer: a case-control study in Milan, Italy.
    Berrino F; Gatta G; d'Alto M; Crosignani P; Riboli E
    IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):111-23. PubMed ID: 3570398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimal frequency of screening for cervical cancer: a Toronto case-control study.
    Clarke EA; Hilditch S; Anderson TW
    IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):125-31. PubMed ID: 3570399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Additional results on relative protection of cervical cancer screening according to stage of tumour from the Geneva case-control study.
    Raymond L; Obradovic M; Riotton G
    IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):107-10. PubMed ID: 3570397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cervical cancer screening in Iceland: a case-control study.
    Geirsson G; Kristiansdottir R; Sigurdsson K; Moss S; Tulinius H
    IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):37-41. PubMed ID: 3570413
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cervical cancer control--Rhode Island.
    Centers for Disease Control (CDC)
    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 1989 Sep; 38(38):659-62. PubMed ID: 2506415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Screening history of women with invasive cervical cancer in north-east Italy.
    Zucchetto A; Franceschi S; Clagnan E; Serraino D; Zanier L; Franzo A;
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 Oct; 152(2):200-4. PubMed ID: 20667643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Screening-preventable cervical cancer risks: evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden.
    Andrae B; Kemetli L; Sparén P; Silfverdal L; Strander B; Ryd W; Dillner J; Törnberg S
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(9):622-9. PubMed ID: 18445828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Cytological history of cases of invasive cervical cancer diagnosed in France in 2006].
    Boulanger JC; Fauvet R; Urrutiaguer S; Drean Y; Sevestre H; Ganry O; Bergeron C; Gondry J
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007 Sep; 35(9):764-71. PubMed ID: 17765001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Review of the screening history of Alberta women with invasive cervical cancer.
    Stuart GC; McGregor SE; Duggan MA; Nation JG
    CMAJ; 1997 Sep; 157(5):513-9. PubMed ID: 9294389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cervical cancer screening in north-east Scotland.
    Macgregor JE; Moss S; Parkin DM; Day NE
    IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):25-36. PubMed ID: 3570409
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Screening for cervical cancer.
    Higgins C
    Nurs Times; 1997 May 14-20; 93(20):50-1. PubMed ID: 9197757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Screening patterns within organized programs and survival of Italian women with invasive cervical cancer.
    Zucchetto A; Ronco G; Giorgi Rossi P; Zappa M; Ferretti S; Franzo A; Falcini F; Visioli CB; Zanetti R; Biavati P; La Rosa F; Baracco S; Federico M; Campari C; De Togni A; Piffer S; Pannozzo F; Fusco M; Michiara M; Castaing M; Seghini P; Tisano F; Serraino D;
    Prev Med; 2013 Sep; 57(3):220-6. PubMed ID: 23732239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stop cervical cancer in its tracks.
    Bence SA
    Nursing; 2000 Apr; 30(4):suppl 16-7. PubMed ID: 10797728
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A case-control study of the protective benefit of cervical screening against invasive cervical cancer in NSW women.
    Yang B; Morrell S; Zuo Y; Roder D; Tracey E; Jelfs P
    Cancer Causes Control; 2008 Aug; 19(6):569-76. PubMed ID: 18286380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The cytological screening turned out effective also for adenocarcinoma: a population-based case-control study in Trento, Italy.
    Crocetti E; Battisti L; Betta A; Palma PD; Paci E; Piffer S; Pojer A; Polla E; Zappa M
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2007 Dec; 16(6):564-7. PubMed ID: 18090131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cervical cancer screening.
    Holcomb K; Runowicz CD
    Surg Oncol Clin N Am; 2005 Oct; 14(4):777-97. PubMed ID: 16226691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Smear campaign.
    Eardley A; Elkind A
    Health Serv J; 1992 Aug; 102(5316):28-9. PubMed ID: 10121394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Screening for carcinoma of the cervix today].
    Calzolari E; Ciampaglia G; Coppola S
    Minerva Ginecol; 1996 Nov; 48(11):453-61. PubMed ID: 9005371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Progress in screening for cervical cancer.
    Clarke EA
    CMAJ; 1996 Oct; 155(8):1036-7. PubMed ID: 8873623
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Participation of women in cervical cancer screening].
    Kallio M; Kauraniemi T; Nousiainen AR; Hanstén S; Rytsölä J; Heikkilä M; Hakama M
    Duodecim; 1994; 110(11):1061-7. PubMed ID: 7588113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.