BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3570400)

  • 1. Evaluation of the impact of screening for cancer of the cervix.
    Miller AB
    IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):149-60. PubMed ID: 3570400
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cervical cancer screening programs. I. Epidemiology and natural history of carcinoma of the cervix.
    Can Med Assoc J; 1976 Jun; 114(11):1003-12. PubMed ID: 776378
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Registration of carcinoma in situ and squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix in the screening area of Nijmegen from 1 January 1970 through 31 July 1982].
    Klinkhamer PJ; van der Graaf Y; Vooijs GP
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1984 Oct; 128(42):1979-83. PubMed ID: 6504185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cervical cancer screening: précis and critique of a recent Canadian report.
    Chiavetta J; Leader SR
    Med J Aust; 1977 Jan 1-8; 1(1-2):23-8. PubMed ID: 840075
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Detection of cancer of the cervix uteri].
    Walton RJ; Blanchet M; Boyes DA; Carmichael J; Marshall KG; Miller AB; Thompson DW
    Union Med Can; 1976 Jul; 105(7):997-1047. PubMed ID: 960289
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Evidence for regression of carcinoma-in-situ and for a second form of invasive cervical cancer, Connecticut 1935-73].
    Meigs JW; Laskey PW; Flannery JT
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1976 Jul; 36(7):554-69. PubMed ID: 955362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [A retrospective study of carcinoma of the uterine cervix and the value of cytological cervix studies in healthy women].
    Barentsz JO; Muizebelt F; van der Schee AC; Toonen-van Beek AA
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1979 Nov; 123(45):1932-6. PubMed ID: 514382
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Walton report and its subsequent impact on cervical cancer screening programs in Canada.
    Worth AJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Feb; 63(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 6694805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the effect of Papanicolaou screening in Sweden: record linkage between a central screening registry and the National Cancer Registry.
    Pettersson F; Näslund I; Malker B
    IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):91-105. PubMed ID: 3570419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Changes of morbidity and mortality from cancer of the cervix uteri in Puerto Rico.
    Martínez I
    Bol Asoc Med P R; 1984 Mar; 76(3):100-6. PubMed ID: 6586182
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experience of a continuing mass screening programme. Screening and re-screening for cervical carcinoma in Turku.
    Grönroos M; Tyrkkö J; Järvi O; Rauramo L
    Ann Chir Gynaecol Fenn; 1974; 63(6):470-8. PubMed ID: 4441027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [No effect of organized cervix cancer screening].
    Zahl PH
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2008 May; 128(11):1302; author reply 1302. PubMed ID: 18511980
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recent trends in recorded incidence and mortality from uterine cancer.
    Gallagher RP; Elwood JM
    Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1982; 62():83-7. PubMed ID: 7167199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Cervico-uterine cancer and age].
    Verduzca Rodríguez LA; Palet Guzmán JA; Aguirre González H; González Puebla E
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1997 Apr; 65():119-22. PubMed ID: 9280734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mass screening for cervical carcinoma in Finland. Organization and effect on morbidity and mortality.
    Timonen S; Nieminen U; Kauraniemi T
    Ann Chir Gynaecol Fenn; 1974; 63(2):104-12. PubMed ID: 4853102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A cohort study of cervical cancer screening in British Columbia.
    Boyes DA; Morrison B; Knox EG; Draper GJ; Miller AB
    Clin Invest Med; 1982; 5(1):1-29. PubMed ID: 7116711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Studies of screening, detection and mortality rates in mass screening for uterine cervical cancer in Shimane prefecture].
    Takahashi K; Moriyama M; Takamiya O; Shibukawa T; Iwanari O; Matsunaga I; Kitao M
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1985 Mar; 37(3):377-82. PubMed ID: 3981047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Gynecological screening in Sweden. Report of results and comparison with the cancer registry].
    Ericsson J; MattssonB ; Pettersson F
    Lakartidningen; 1975 Nov; 72(48):4719-24. PubMed ID: 1195913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Arkansas cervical cancer program.
    Steinkamp RC; Roman-Lopez J; Kenney JA; Hairston MG; Hylton S; Hammett WN; Marsh S; Becton P; Collier S
    J Ark Med Soc; 1980 Jan; 76(1):312-22. PubMed ID: 6444400
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Cervix carcinoma and carcinoma in situ in the Haarlem region in the period 1965-1979].
    Oeberius Kapteyn JL
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1981 Nov; 125(46):1865-9. PubMed ID: 7312058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.