BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3570410)

  • 1. Organization and results of cervical cancer screening in the German Democratic Republic.
    Ebeling K; Nischan P
    IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):251-66. PubMed ID: 3570410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Screening for prevention and early detection of cervical cancer in the German Democratic Republic-- an analysis (author's transl)].
    Ebeling K; Berndt H; Neumann HG; Neuser D; Nischan P; Seidenschnur G
    Arch Geschwulstforsch; 1981; 51(8):663-71. PubMed ID: 7340712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A screening programme for cervical cancer that worked.
    Hakama M; Louhivuori K
    Cancer Surv; 1988; 7(3):403-16. PubMed ID: 3242792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Cervical cancer after 10 years of nationally coordinated screening].
    Haldorsen T; Skare GB; Steen R; Thoresen SO
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2008 Mar; 128(6):682-5. PubMed ID: 18337847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Mass screening for cervical cancer. Experiences after 25 years of voluntary screening and 2 years of organized screening].
    Thoresen SO; Skare GB; Sandvin O
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1997 Aug; 117(18):2613-5. PubMed ID: 9324815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effective screening programmes for cervical cancer in low- and middle-income developing countries.
    Sankaranarayanan R; Budukh AM; Rajkumar R
    Bull World Health Organ; 2001; 79(10):954-62. PubMed ID: 11693978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Screening-preventable cervical cancer risks: evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden.
    Andrae B; Kemetli L; Sparén P; Silfverdal L; Strander B; Ryd W; Dillner J; Törnberg S
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(9):622-9. PubMed ID: 18445828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cervical cancer in New Zealand: national and regional trends.
    Cox B; Borman B
    N Z Med J; 1994 Aug; 107(984):323-6. PubMed ID: 8072727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Screening for cervical cancer in the county of Funen. Status of 25 years of development and experiences].
    Hølund B; Grinsted P
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2006 May; 168(22):2163-6. PubMed ID: 16768956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cervical cancer screening: A Slovenian experience.
    Primic-Zakelj M; Repse-Fokter A
    Coll Antropol; 2007 Apr; 31 Suppl 2():23-6. PubMed ID: 17600934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Progress in the early detection of cervix cancer from the viewpoint of the Saarland cancer register].
    Brenner H; Wiebelt H; Ziegler H
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1990 Apr; 50(4):304-9. PubMed ID: 2358181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cervical cancer screening in Serbia.
    Kesić V; Jovićević-Bekić A; Vujnović M
    Coll Antropol; 2007 Apr; 31 Suppl 2():31-6. PubMed ID: 17598502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Incidence and mortality of uterine cervix cancer in Norway. When do we get organized nation-wide cytologic screening in Norway?].
    Magnus K; Langmark F
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1990 May; 110(12):1557-9. PubMed ID: 2187277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Mass screening for cervical cancer. A one-year registration of cervical cytological tests].
    Bjørge T; Gunbjørud AB; Langmark F; Skare GB; Thoresen SO
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1994 Jan; 114(3):341-5. PubMed ID: 8191435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Status of preventive screening for uterine cervix cancer in Denmark in 1994].
    Lynge E; Arffmann E; Erbs K; Hansen KC; Henriksen B; Holten IW; Hølund B; Jakobsen AB; Jespersen NB; Olesen F
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1994 Jan; 156(4):471-3. PubMed ID: 8140664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical impact of quality assurance in an organized cervical screening program.
    Andrae B; Smith P
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1999 May; 78(5):429-35. PubMed ID: 10326890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Uptake of cervical cancer screening in The Netherlands is mainly influenced by women's beliefs about the screening and by the inviting organization.
    Tacken MA; Braspenning JC; Hermens RP; Spreeuwenberg PM; van den Hoogen HJ; de Bakker DH; Groenewegen PP; Grol RP
    Eur J Public Health; 2007 Apr; 17(2):178-85. PubMed ID: 16837520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Fitzroy Valley Pap Smear Register. Cervical screening in a population of Australian aboriginal women.
    Mak DB; Straton JA
    Med J Aust; 1993 Feb; 158(3):163-6. PubMed ID: 8450781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Cervical cancer screening campaign in Doubs: evaluation of the first three years of the pilot program].
    Gautier CP; Monnet E; Meslans Y
    Sante Publique; 2000 May; 12 Spec No():37-43. PubMed ID: 10989627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The German cervical cancer screening model: development and validation of a decision-analytic model for cervical cancer screening in Germany.
    Siebert U; Sroczynski G; Hillemanns P; Engel J; Stabenow R; Stegmaier C; Voigt K; Gibis B; Hölzel D; Goldie SJ
    Eur J Public Health; 2006 Apr; 16(2):185-92. PubMed ID: 16469759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.