209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3570417)
1. Risk of cervical cancer following negative smears in Maribo County, Denmark, 1966-1982.
Lynge E; Poll P
IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):69-86. PubMed ID: 3570417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Incidence of cervical cancer following negative smear. A cohort study from Maribo County, Denmark.
Lynge E; Poll P
Am J Epidemiol; 1986 Sep; 124(3):345-52. PubMed ID: 3740035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Consequences of incorrect interpretation of vaginal smear tests in a screening program].
Lynge E; Arffmann E; Poll P; Andersen PK
Ugeskr Laeger; 1994 Apr; 156(17):2594-6. PubMed ID: 8016968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Screening-preventable cervical cancer risks: evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden.
Andrae B; Kemetli L; Sparén P; Silfverdal L; Strander B; Ryd W; Dillner J; Törnberg S
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(9):622-9. PubMed ID: 18445828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Risk of invasive cervical cancer after three consecutive negative Pap smears.
Coldman A; Phillips N; Kan L; Matisic J; Benedet L; Towers L
J Med Screen; 2003; 10(4):196-200. PubMed ID: 14738657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Risk of invasive cervical cancer after Pap smears: the protective effect of multiple negatives.
Coldman A; Phillips N; Kan L; Matisic J; Benedet L; Towers L
J Med Screen; 2005; 12(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 15814014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Follow-up of non-negative cervical cytological smears in the county of Funen].
Dahl MB; Hølund B; Sørensen B; Ahrons S; Grinsted P; Poulsen EF
Ugeskr Laeger; 1998 Sep; 160(40):5798-801. PubMed ID: 9782760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Are analyses of cytological cervix smears from young women more harmful than beneficial?].
Skjeldestad FE; Hagen B; Hagmar B; Iversen OE; Juvkam KH; Steen R; Thoresen S; Hareide B
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2007 Jun; 127(13):1782-5. PubMed ID: 17599128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Organized cervical cancer screening for underpriviledged women].
Piana L; Leandri FX; Jacqueme B; Heid P; Corti J; Andrac-Meyer L; Sancho-Garnier H
Bull Cancer; 2007 May; 94(5):461-7. PubMed ID: 17535784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of an antepartum Pap smear on the coverage of a cervical cancer screening programme: a population-based prospective study.
Nygård M; Daltveit AK; Thoresen SO; Nygård JF
BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Jan; 7():10. PubMed ID: 17244348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the effect of Papanicolaou screening in Sweden: record linkage between a central screening registry and the National Cancer Registry.
Pettersson F; Näslund I; Malker B
IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):91-105. PubMed ID: 3570419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prophylactic cytological investigation for cervical cancer in relation to stage at diagnosis: a study of 420 women in Denmark.
Olesen F
J R Coll Gen Pract; 1988 Aug; 38(313):356-9. PubMed ID: 3256647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Frequency and follow-up of non-negative cervical smears in the counties of Storstrøm, Vestsjaelland and Bornholm in 1979-1989].
Lynge E; Poll P; Larsen J; Schultz HB; Thommesen N
Ugeskr Laeger; 1993 Jan; 155(4):240-5. PubMed ID: 8430472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The agreement between self-reported cervical smear abnormalities and screening programme records.
Canfell K; Beral V; Green J; Cameron R; Baker K; Brown A
J Med Screen; 2006; 13(2):72-5. PubMed ID: 16792828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of organized screening on incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in Denmark.
Lynge E; Madsen M; Engholm G
Cancer Res; 1989 Apr; 49(8):2157-60. PubMed ID: 2702657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cervical cancer screening. Organised screening to avoid unnecessary conisation.
Prescrire Int; 2010 Aug; 19(108):172-7, 179. PubMed ID: 20939454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pap test--with or without vaginal smear?
Milicić-Juhas V; Perić M; Pajtler M; Prvulović I; Curzik D
Coll Antropol; 2010 Mar; 34(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 20437636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Mass screening for cervical cancer. Experiences after 25 years of voluntary screening and 2 years of organized screening].
Thoresen SO; Skare GB; Sandvin O
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1997 Aug; 117(18):2613-5. PubMed ID: 9324815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Cervical cancer after 10 years of nationally coordinated screening].
Haldorsen T; Skare GB; Steen R; Thoresen SO
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2008 Mar; 128(6):682-5. PubMed ID: 18337847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Recommendations for cervical screening 1997. Members of the Working Party on Cervical Screening.
N Z Med J; 1998 Mar; 111(1062):94-8. PubMed ID: 9577460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
