These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35704550)
1. Mid-level Feature Differences Support Early Animacy and Object Size Distinctions: Evidence from Electroencephalography Decoding. Wang R; Janini D; Konkle T J Cogn Neurosci; 2022 Aug; 34(9):1670-1680. PubMed ID: 35704550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mid-level visual features underlie the high-level categorical organization of the ventral stream. Long B; Yu CP; Konkle T Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Sep; 115(38):E9015-E9024. PubMed ID: 30171168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mid-level perceptual features contain early cues to animacy. Long B; Störmer VS; Alvarez GA J Vis; 2017 Jun; 17(6):20. PubMed ID: 28654965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Ventral Visual Pathway Represents Animal Appearance over Animacy, Unlike Human Behavior and Deep Neural Networks. Bracci S; Ritchie JB; Kalfas I; Op de Beeck HP J Neurosci; 2019 Aug; 39(33):6513-6525. PubMed ID: 31196934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tracking the Spatiotemporal Neural Dynamics of Real-world Object Size and Animacy in the Human Brain. Khaligh-Razavi SM; Cichy RM; Pantazis D; Oliva A J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Nov; 30(11):1559-1576. PubMed ID: 29877767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Animacy and real-world size shape object representations in the human medial temporal lobes. Blumenthal A; Stojanoski B; Martin CB; Cusack R; Köhler S Hum Brain Mapp; 2018 Sep; 39(9):3779-3792. PubMed ID: 29947037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Spatiotemporal Neural Dynamics of Object Recognition for Natural Images and Line Drawings. Singer JJD; Cichy RM; Hebart MN J Neurosci; 2023 Jan; 43(3):484-500. PubMed ID: 36535769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Decoding the time-course of object recognition in the human brain: From visual features to categorical decisions. Contini EW; Wardle SG; Carlson TA Neuropsychologia; 2017 Oct; 105():165-176. PubMed ID: 28215698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How big should this object be? Perceptual influences on viewing-size preferences. Chen YC; Deza A; Konkle T Cognition; 2022 Aug; 225():105114. PubMed ID: 35381479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perceptual and Semantic Representations at Encoding Contribute to True and False Recognition of Objects. Naspi L; Hoffman P; Devereux B; Morcom AM J Neurosci; 2021 Oct; 41(40):8375-8389. PubMed ID: 34413205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A familiar-size Stroop effect in the absence of basic-level recognition. Long B; Konkle T Cognition; 2017 Nov; 168():234-242. PubMed ID: 28732302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tripartite organization of the ventral stream by animacy and object size. Konkle T; Caramazza A J Neurosci; 2013 Jun; 33(25):10235-42. PubMed ID: 23785139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Representational Similarity Analysis of the Dynamics of Object Processing Using Single-Trial EEG Classification. Kaneshiro B; Perreau Guimaraes M; Kim HS; Norcia AM; Suppes P PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0135697. PubMed ID: 26295970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A method for real-time visual stimulus selection in the study of cortical object perception. Leeds DD; Tarr MJ Neuroimage; 2016 Jun; 133():529-548. PubMed ID: 26973168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Similarity judgments and cortical visual responses reflect different properties of object and scene categories in naturalistic images. King ML; Groen IIA; Steel A; Kravitz DJ; Baker CI Neuroimage; 2019 Aug; 197():368-382. PubMed ID: 31054350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]