188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35705138)
1. Measuring Satisfaction With Upper Limb Prostheses: Orthotics and Prosthetics User Survey Revision That Includes Issues of Concern to Women.
Resnik LJ; Borgia ML; Clark MA; Heinemann AW; Ni P
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2022 Dec; 103(12):2316-2324. PubMed ID: 35705138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cross-cultural adaptation and Rasch validation of the Slovene version of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users' Survey (OPUS) Client Satisfaction with Device (CSD) in upper-limb prosthesis users.
Burger H; Giordano A; Mlakar M; Albensi C; Brezovar D; Franchignoni F
Ann Phys Rehabil Med; 2019 May; 62(3):168-173. PubMed ID: 30965159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measuring residual limb health in persons with upper limb amputation: Modifications of the Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire residual limb health scale.
Resnik L; Borgia M; Clark MA; Ni P
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2023 Oct; 47(5):544-551. PubMed ID: 36897201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The client satisfaction with device: a Rasch validation of the Arabic version in patients with upper and lower limb amputation.
Bakhsh HR; Kablan N; Alammar W; Tatar Y; Ferriero G
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2021 Apr; 19(1):134. PubMed ID: 33906680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Psychosocial Adjustment Measure for Persons With Upper Limb Amputation.
Resnik LJ; Ni P; Borgia ML; Clark MA
Can Prosthet Orthot J; 2022; 5(1):37873. PubMed ID: 37614482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cross-Cultural Validity and Differential Item Functioning of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users' Survey With Swedish and United States Users of Lower-Limb Prosthesis.
Jarl G; Heinemann AW; Lindner HY; Norling Hermansson LM
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2015 Sep; 96(9):1615-26. PubMed ID: 25804528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the satisfaction module of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users' Survey.
Demirdel S; Ulaş K; Erol Çelik S; Karahan S; Topuz S
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2022 Apr; 46(2):170-174. PubMed ID: 34840278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Psychometric evaluation of the Arabic version of the Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology (A-QUEST 2.0) in prosthesis users.
Kablan N; Bakhsh HR; Alammar W; Tatar Y; Ferriero G
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2022 Feb; 58(1):118-126. PubMed ID: 34247472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Upper Extremity Functional Scale for Prosthesis Users (UEFS-P): subscales for one and two-handed tasks.
Resnik L; Borgia M; Heinemann AW; Stevens P; Clark MA; Ni P
Disabil Rehabil; 2023 Nov; 45(22):3768-3778. PubMed ID: 36357971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Structural validity and reliability of the patient experience measure: A new approach to assessing psychosocial experience of upper limb prosthesis users.
Resnik LJ; Borgia ML; Clark MA; Graczyk E; Segil J; Ni P
PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0261865. PubMed ID: 34962943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validity and reliability of the Dutch translation of the OPUS' client satisfaction with device module in chronic users of hand orthoses.
Oud T; Tuijtelaars J; Schenk J; Nollet F; Brehm MA
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2023 Aug; 21(1):93. PubMed ID: 37605151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of the Arabic version of the client satisfaction with device module of the orthotics and prosthetics users survey.
Bakhsh H; Franchignoni F; Bravini E; Ferriero G; Giordano A; Foti C
Ann Saudi Med; 2014; 34(4):320-7. PubMed ID: 25811205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validity evidence for a modified version of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users' Survey.
Jarl GM; Heinemann AW; Norling Hermansson LM
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2012 Nov; 7(6):469-78. PubMed ID: 22439801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of the Italian version of the Client Satisfaction with Device module of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users' Survey.
Bravini E; Franchignoni F; Ferriero G; Giordano A; Bakhsh H; Sartorio F; Vercelli S
Disabil Health J; 2014 Oct; 7(4):442-7. PubMed ID: 25224984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Persian version of satisfaction assessment module of Orthotics and Prosthetics Users' Survey.
Hadadi M; Ghoseiri K; Fardipour S; Kashani RV; Asadi F; Asghari A
Disabil Health J; 2016 Jan; 9(1):90-9. PubMed ID: 26476934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Brief activity performance measure for upper limb amputees: BAM-ULA.
Resnik L; Borgia M; Acluche F
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Feb; 42(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 28091278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.
Meng R; Li J; Wang Z; Zhang D; Liu B; Luo Y; Hu Y; Yu C
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2020 Mar; 18(1):70. PubMed ID: 32169070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Psychometric properties of the Client Satisfaction with Device module of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users' Survey (OPUS): a scoping review.
Sorrentino G; Vercelli S; Salgovic L; Ronconi G; Bakhsh HR; Ferriero G
Int J Rehabil Res; 2021 Sep; 44(3):193-199. PubMed ID: 34356037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of the orthotics and prosthetics user survey upper extremity functional status module in people with unilateral upper limb amputation.
Burger H; Franchignoni F; Heinemann AW; Kotnik S; Giordano A
J Rehabil Med; 2008 May; 40(5):393-9. PubMed ID: 18461266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Translation and validation of the Malay version of modified orthotics and prosthetics users' survey.
Hashim NM; Che Daud AZ; Ibrahim AH; Ab Majid MH; Mohd Ghazali MN; Abdul Razak MM; Mohd Rusli MR
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2024 Jan; 48(1):89-99. PubMed ID: 37639558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
