These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35705316)

  • 1. [An Easy-to-use Method for CT Image Simulation with Parameter Optimization Using a Water Phantom].
    Narita A; Okamoto K; Toyonaga K; Ohkubo M
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2022 Jul; 78(7):732-740. PubMed ID: 35705316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development, validation, and simplification of a scanner-specific CT simulator.
    Tunissen SAM; Oostveen LJ; Moriakov N; Teuwen J; Michielsen K; Smit EJ; Sechopoulos I
    Med Phys; 2024 Mar; 51(3):2081-2095. PubMed ID: 37656009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Realistic simulation of reduced-dose CT with noise modeling and sinogram synthesis using DICOM CT images.
    Won Kim C; Kim JH
    Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 41(1):011901. PubMed ID: 24387509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Simulation of scanner- and patient-specific low-dose CT imaging from existing CT images.
    Naziroglu RE; van Ravesteijn VF; van Vliet LJ; Streekstra GJ; Vos FM
    Phys Med; 2017 Apr; 36():12-23. PubMed ID: 28410681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantification and homogenization of image noise between two CT scanner models.
    Einstein SA; Rong XJ; Jensen CT; Liu X
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 21(1):174-178. PubMed ID: 31859454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. CT head-scan dosimetry in an anthropomorphic phantom and associated measurement of ACR accreditation-phantom imaging metrics under clinically representative scan conditions.
    Brunner CC; Stern SH; Minniti R; Parry MI; Skopec M; Chakrabarti K
    Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081917. PubMed ID: 23927331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An algorithm for automated modulation transfer function measurement using an edge of a PMMA phantom: Impact of field of view on spatial resolution of CT images.
    Anam C; Fujibuchi T; Budi WS; Haryanto F; Dougherty G
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 19(6):244-252. PubMed ID: 30338920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A computer simulation method for low-dose CT images by use of real high-dose images: a phantom study.
    Takenaga T; Katsuragawa S; Goto M; Hatemura M; Uchiyama Y; Shiraishi J
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2016 Jan; 9(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 26290269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adaptive nonlocal means filtering based on local noise level for CT denoising.
    Li Z; Yu L; Trzasko JD; Lake DS; Blezek DJ; Fletcher JG; McCollough CH; Manduca A
    Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 41(1):011908. PubMed ID: 24387516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characterization of imaging performance in differential phase contrast CT compared with the conventional CT: spectrum of noise equivalent quanta NEQ(k).
    Tang X; Yang Y; Tang S
    Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4467-82. PubMed ID: 22830779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Deep Learning Reconstruction at CT: Phantom Study of the Image Characteristics.
    Higaki T; Nakamura Y; Zhou J; Yu Z; Nemoto T; Tatsugami F; Awai K
    Acad Radiol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):82-87. PubMed ID: 31818389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Characteristics and clinical application of a treatment simulator with Ct-option.
    Verellen D; Vinh-Hung V; Bijdekerke P; Nijs F; Linthout N; Bel A; Storme G
    Radiother Oncol; 1999 Mar; 50(3):355-66. PubMed ID: 10392823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A novel simulation-driven reconstruction approach for x-ray computed tomography.
    Hsieh J
    Med Phys; 2022 Apr; 49(4):2245-2258. PubMed ID: 35102555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. DukeSim: A Realistic, Rapid, and Scanner-Specific Simulation Framework in Computed Tomography.
    Abadi E; Harrawood B; Sharma S; Kapadia A; Segars WP; Samei E
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2019 Jun; 38(6):1457-1465. PubMed ID: 30561344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A pitfall of using the circular-edge technique with image averaging for spatial resolution measurement in iteratively reconstructed CT images.
    Narita A; Ohkubo M
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 21(2):144-151. PubMed ID: 31957969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An effective method to verify line and point spread functions measured in computed tomography.
    Ohkubo M; Wada S; Matsumoto T; Nishizawa K
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2757-64. PubMed ID: 16964851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Technical Note: Evaluation of a 160-mm/256-row CT scanner for whole-heart quantitative myocardial perfusion imaging.
    So A; Imai Y; Nett B; Jackson J; Nett L; Hsieh J; Wisenberg G; Teefy P; Yadegari A; Islam A; Lee TY
    Med Phys; 2016 Aug; 43(8):4821. PubMed ID: 27487900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of bowtie filter and object position on the two-dimensional noise power spectrum of a clinical MDCT system.
    Gomez-Cardona D; Cruz-Bastida JP; Li K; Budde A; Hsieh J; Chen GH
    Med Phys; 2016 Aug; 43(8):4495. PubMed ID: 27487866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. CT automated exposure control using a generalized detectability index.
    Khobragade P; Rupcich F; Fan J; Crotty DJ; Kulkarni NM; O'Connor SD; Foley WD; Schmidt TG
    Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 46(1):140-151. PubMed ID: 30417403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Low-dose cone-beam CT via raw counts domain low-signal correction schemes: Performance assessment and task-based parameter optimization (Part I: Assessment of spatial resolution and noise performance).
    Hayes JW; Gomez-Cardona D; Zhang R; Li K; Cruz-Bastida JP; Chen GH
    Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):1942-1956. PubMed ID: 29532483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.