These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35705853)

  • 1. Malay Lexicon Project 2: Morphology in Malay word recognition.
    Maziyah Mohamed M; Yap MJ; Chee QW; Jared D
    Mem Cognit; 2023 Apr; 51(3):647-665. PubMed ID: 35705853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Malay Lexicon Project 3: The impact of orthographic-semantic consistency on lexical decision latencies.
    Maziyah Mohamed M; Jared D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2024 Mar; ():17470218241234668. PubMed ID: 38356189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. MorphoLex: A derivational morphological database for 70,000 English words.
    Sánchez-Gutiérrez CH; Mailhot H; Deacon SH; Wilson MA
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Aug; 50(4):1568-1580. PubMed ID: 29124719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. MorphoLex-FR: A derivational morphological database for 38,840 French words.
    Mailhot H; Wilson MA; Macoir J; Deacon SH; Sánchez-Gutiérrez C
    Behav Res Methods; 2020 Jun; 52(3):1008-1025. PubMed ID: 31676967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Translation norms for Malay and English words: The effects of word class, semantic variability, lexical characteristics, and language proficiency on translation.
    Lee ST; van Heuven WJB; Price JM; Leong CXR
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Oct; 55(7):3585-3601. PubMed ID: 36219309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bigram frequency, number of syllables and morphemes and their effects on lexical decision and word naming.
    Muncer SJ; Knight D; Adams JW
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2014 Jun; 43(3):241-54. PubMed ID: 23613200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Malay Lexicon Project: a database of lexical statistics for 9,592 words.
    Yap MJ; Liow SJ; Jalil SB; Faizal SS
    Behav Res Methods; 2010 Nov; 42(4):992-1003. PubMed ID: 21139166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Morphological De-com-pos-it-ion Helps Recognize Low-er Frequency Words in Typically Developing Spanish-Speaking Children.
    D'Alessio MJ; Wilson MA; Jaichenco V
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2019 Dec; 48(6):1407-1428. PubMed ID: 31493236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Persian Lexicon Project: minimized orthographic neighbourhood effects in a dense language.
    Nemati F; Westbury C; Hollis G; Haghbin H
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2022 Oct; 51(5):957-979. PubMed ID: 35366147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lexical analyses of the function and phonology of Papuan Malay word stress.
    Kaland C; Kluge A; van Heuven VJ
    Phonetica; 2021 Apr; 78(2):141-168. PubMed ID: 33892529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How language affects children's use of derivational morphology in visual word and pseudoword processing: evidence from a cross-language study.
    Casalis S; Quémart P; Duncan LG
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():452. PubMed ID: 25932018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A database of 629 English compound words: ratings of familiarity, lexeme meaning dominance, semantic transparency, age of acquisition, imageability, and sensory experience.
    Juhasz BJ; Lai YH; Woodcock ML
    Behav Res Methods; 2015 Dec; 47(4):1004-1019. PubMed ID: 25361864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computational Modeling of Morphological Effects in Bangla Visual Word Recognition.
    Dasgupta T; Sinha M; Basu A
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2015 Oct; 44(5):587-610. PubMed ID: 24985150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sensitivity to morphological composition in spoken word recognition: Evidence from grammatical and lexical identification tasks.
    Gwilliams LE; Monahan PJ; Samuel AG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Nov; 41(6):1663-74. PubMed ID: 25961359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Salience of Complex Words and Their Parts: Which Comes First?
    Giraudo H; Dal Maso S
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1778. PubMed ID: 27917133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lexical decision and the number of morphemes and affixes.
    Muncer SJ; Knight DC; Adams JW
    Scand J Psychol; 2013 Oct; 54(5):349-52. PubMed ID: 23829866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Examination of the neighborhood activation theory in normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Dirks DD; Takayanagi S; Moshfegh A; Noffsinger PD; Fausti SA
    Ear Hear; 2001 Feb; 22(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 11271971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Statistical models of morphology predict eye-tracking measures during visual word recognition.
    Lehtonen M; Varjokallio M; Kivikari H; Hultén A; Virpioja S; Hakala T; Kurimo M; Lagus K; Salmelin R
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Oct; 47(7):1245-1269. PubMed ID: 31102191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interplay between morphology and frequency in lexical access: the case of the base frequency effect.
    Vannest J; Newport EL; Newman AJ; Bavelier D
    Brain Res; 2011 Feb; 1373():144-59. PubMed ID: 21167136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The influence of visualization of orthography on the recognition of written words].
    Mathey S
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2001 Mar; 55(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 11301725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.