254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35705924)
1. The dilemma of 12/14F ureteral access sheath (UAS) usage: a case control study.
Ozimek T; Wiessmeyer JR; Struck JP; Roesch MC; Gilbert N; Laturnus JM; Merseburger AS; Kramer MW
BMC Urol; 2022 Jun; 22(1):84. PubMed ID: 35705924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of suctioning and traditional ureteral access sheath during flexible ureteroscopy in the treatment of renal stones.
Zhu Z; Cui Y; Zeng F; Li Y; Chen Z; Hequn C
World J Urol; 2019 May; 37(5):921-929. PubMed ID: 30120500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Flexible ureteroscopy without ureteral access sheath.
Cristallo C; Santillán D; Tobia I; Tirapegui FI; Daels FP; González MS
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed); 2022; 46(6):354-360. PubMed ID: 35260371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Role of 12/14F Ureteral Access Sheath in Flexible Ureteroscopy for Moderate Nephrolithiasis.
Ozimek T; Dellas P; Becker B; Miernik A; Roesch MC; Merseburger AS; Kramer MW; Wießmeyer JR
Aktuelle Urol; 2023 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 36918150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of ureteral access sheath on renal stone treatment: prospective comparative non-randomised outcomes over a 7-year period.
Lima A; Reeves T; Geraghty R; Pietropaolo A; Whitehurst L; Somani BK
World J Urol; 2020 May; 38(5):1329-1333. PubMed ID: 31342247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laser fibre, rather than the stone, may harm the scope: retrospective monocentric analysis of 26 pre- and intraoperative factors of flexible ureteroscope (fURS) damage.
Ozimek T; Cordes J; Gilbert N; Hupe MC; Wiessmeyer JR; Schneider MH; Merseburger AS; Kramer MW
World J Urol; 2020 Aug; 38(8):2035-2040. PubMed ID: 31659464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The outcomes of flexible ureteroscopy for renal calculi of 2 cm or more with and without the use of ureteral access sheath: A retrospective study.
Fathi BA; Elgammal AA; Abouelgreed TA; Ghoneimy OM; Aboelsaad AY; Alhefnawy MA
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2023 Sep; 95(3):11524. PubMed ID: 37668556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. What is the appropriate gravel size during ureteroscopy lithotripsy? An in vitro evaluation.
Song B; Jin D; Cheng Y; Wang Z; Wang F; Fang L
Urolithiasis; 2023 Mar; 51(1):52. PubMed ID: 36929459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Gap between UAS and ureteroscope predicts renal stone-free rate after flexible ureteroscopy with the fragmentation technique.
Komeya M; Odaka H; Watanabe T; Kiuchi H; Ogawa T; Yao M; Matsuzaki J
World J Urol; 2021 Jul; 39(7):2733-2739. PubMed ID: 32986134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The "no-touch" technique in the flexible ureteroscopic approach of renal stones.
Geavlete B; Cozma C; Geavlete P
J Med Life; 2021; 14(4):481-486. PubMed ID: 34621370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is 10/12 Fr Ureteral Access Sheath more Suitable for Flexible Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy?
Li W; Mao Y; Gu Y; Lu C; Gu X; Hua B; Pan W; Xi Q; Wang Z
Urol J; 2021 Aug; 19(2):89-94. PubMed ID: 34346044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Role of flexible uretero-renoscopy in management of renal calculi in anomalous kidneys: single-center experience.
Singh AG; Chhabra JS; Sabnis R; Ganpule A; Jairath A; Shah D; Desai M
World J Urol; 2017 Feb; 35(2):319-324. PubMed ID: 27306685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contemporary Practice Patterns of Flexible Ureteroscopy for Treating Renal Stones: Results of a Worldwide Survey.
Dauw CA; Simeon L; Alruwaily AF; Sanguedolce F; Hollingsworth JM; Roberts WW; Faerber GJ; Wolf JS; Ghani KR
J Endourol; 2015 Nov; 29(11):1221-30. PubMed ID: 26154856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Application of Suctioning Ureteral Access Sheath during Flexible Ureteroscopy for Renal Stones Decreases the Risk of Postoperative Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome.
Qian X; Liu C; Hong S; Xu J; Qian C; Zhu J; Wang S; Zhang J
Int J Clin Pract; 2022; 2022():9354714. PubMed ID: 35685551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Flexible Ureterorenoscopy for Treatment of Kidney Stones: Establishment as Primary Standard Therapy in a Tertiary Stone Center.
Ising S; Labenski H; Baltes S; Khaffaf A; Thomas C; Wiesner C
Urol Int; 2015; 95(3):329-35. PubMed ID: 26397097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Safety and Efficacy in Preventing Postoperative Infectious Complications of a 14/16F Ureteral Access Sheath with a 12/14F Ureteral Access Sheath in Flexible Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy.
Chen Y; Liao B; Feng S; Ye D; Zeng G; Wang K; Shi M
J Endourol; 2018 Oct; 32(10):923-927. PubMed ID: 30122070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is It a Good Strategy to Proceed a Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Session Sheathless After Ureteral Access Sheath Insertion Failure? A RIRSearch Study.
Özman O; Çınar Ö; Çakır H; Başataç C; Akgül HM; Demirbilek M; Sancak EB; Yazıcı CM; Başeskioğlu B; Önal B; Akpınar H
J Endourol; 2023 Jul; 37(7):747-752. PubMed ID: 37021344
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating Predictive Factor of Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome and Postoperative Pain in Patients Without Ureteral Stent Placement After Ureteral Access Sheath Use in Flexible Ureteroscopy for Stone Management.
Inoue T; Hamamoto S; Okada S; Yamamichi F; Fujita M; Tominaga K; Fujisawa M
J Endourol; 2022 Feb; 36(2):169-175. PubMed ID: 34409849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The Effect of Ureteral Access Sheath Use/Caliber Change on Outcomes of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery, Short-Term Kidney Functions, Radiation Exposure, Ureteroscope Lifetime, and Factors Predicting Insertion Failure: A RIRSearch Study.
Özman O; Başataç C; Akgül M; Çakır H; Çınar Ö; Şimşekoğlu F; Yazıcı CM; Sancak EB; Baseskioglu B; Akpınar H; Önal B
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2024 Jan; 34(1):33-38. PubMed ID: 37948549
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Flexible ureteroscopy with novel flexible ureteral access sheath versus mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of 2-3 cm renal stones.
Chen Y; Xi H; Yu Y; Cheng X; Yang H; Deng W; Liu W; Wang G; Zhou X
Int J Urol; 2024 Mar; 31(3):281-286. PubMed ID: 38017651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
