BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35706990)

  • 1. Prediction of tumour pathological subtype from genomic profile using sparse logistic regression with random effects.
    Kaymaz Ö; Alqahtani K; Wood HM; Gusnanto A
    J Appl Stat; 2021; 48(4):605-622. PubMed ID: 35706990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sparse modelling of cancer patients' survival based on genomic copy number alterations.
    Alqahtani K; Taylor CC; Wood HM; Gusnanto A
    J Biomed Inform; 2022 Apr; 128():104025. PubMed ID: 35181494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genomic selection using regularized linear regression models: ridge regression, lasso, elastic net and their extensions.
    Ogutu JO; Schulz-Streeck T; Piepho HP
    BMC Proc; 2012 May; 6 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S10. PubMed ID: 22640436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sparse Logistic Regression With
    Chen DW; Miao R; Deng ZY; Lu YY; Liang Y; Huang L
    Front Neuroinform; 2020; 14():29. PubMed ID: 32848688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Elastic SCAD as a novel penalization method for SVM classification tasks in high-dimensional data.
    Becker N; Toedt G; Lichter P; Benner A
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 May; 12():138. PubMed ID: 21554689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Structured sparse logistic regression with application to lung cancer prediction using breath volatile biomarkers.
    Zhang X; Zhang Q; Wang X; Ma S; Fang K
    Stat Med; 2020 Mar; 39(7):955-967. PubMed ID: 31880351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A flexible framework for sparse simultaneous component based data integration.
    Van Deun K; Wilderjans TF; van den Berg RA; Antoniadis A; Van Mechelen I
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 Nov; 12():448. PubMed ID: 22085701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimized application of penalized regression methods to diverse genomic data.
    Waldron L; Pintilie M; Tsao MS; Shepherd FA; Huttenhower C; Jurisica I
    Bioinformatics; 2011 Dec; 27(24):3399-406. PubMed ID: 22156367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sparse logistic regression with a L1/2 penalty for gene selection in cancer classification.
    Liang Y; Liu C; Luan XZ; Leung KS; Chan TM; Xu ZB; Zhang H
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2013 Jun; 14():198. PubMed ID: 23777239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Favoring the hierarchical constraint in penalized survival models for randomized trials in precision medicine.
    Belhechmi S; Le Teuff G; De Bin R; Rotolo F; Michiels S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2023 Mar; 24(1):96. PubMed ID: 36927444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Penalty Functions for Sparse Canonical Correlation Analysis.
    Chalise P; Fridley BL
    Comput Stat Data Anal; 2012 Feb; 56(2):245-254. PubMed ID: 21984855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. To tune or not to tune, a case study of ridge logistic regression in small or sparse datasets.
    Šinkovec H; Heinze G; Blagus R; Geroldinger A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Sep; 21(1):199. PubMed ID: 34592945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. High-dimensional Cox models: the choice of penalty as part of the model building process.
    Benner A; Zucknick M; Hielscher T; Ittrich C; Mansmann U
    Biom J; 2010 Feb; 52(1):50-69. PubMed ID: 20166132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Path Algorithm for Constrained Estimation.
    Zhou H; Lange K
    J Comput Graph Stat; 2013; 22(2):261-283. PubMed ID: 24039382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Network-Regularized Sparse Logistic Regression Models for Clinical Risk Prediction and Biomarker Discovery.
    Min W; Liu J; Zhang S
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2018; 15(3):944-953. PubMed ID: 28113328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fast Marginal Likelihood Estimation of Penalties for Group-Adaptive Elastic Net.
    van Nee MM; van de Brug T; van de Wiel MA
    J Comput Graph Stat; 2023; 32(3):950-960. PubMed ID: 38013849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of likelihood penalization and variance decomposition approaches for clinical prediction models: A simulation study.
    Lohmann A; Groenwold RHH; van Smeden M
    Biom J; 2024 Jan; 66(1):e2200108. PubMed ID: 37199142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sparse Group Penalties for bi-level variable selection.
    Buch G; Schulz A; Schmidtmann I; Strauch K; Wild PS
    Biom J; 2024 Jun; 66(4):e2200334. PubMed ID: 38747086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Penalized estimating equations.
    Fu WJ
    Biometrics; 2003 Mar; 59(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 12762449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Logistic regression with adaptive sparse group lasso penalty and its application in acute leukemia diagnosis.
    Li J; Liang K; Song X
    Comput Biol Med; 2022 Feb; 141():105154. PubMed ID: 34952336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.