BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35708316)

  • 1. Real-world febrile neutropenia rates with same-day versus next-day pegfilgrastim after myelosuppressive chemotherapy.
    Kitchen K; Mosier MC
    Future Oncol; 2022 Jul; 18(23):2551-2560. PubMed ID: 35708316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Same-day versus next-day pegfilgrastim or pegfilgrastim-cbqv in patients with lymphoma receiving CHOP-like chemotherapy.
    McBride A; Alrawashdh N; Bartels T; Moore L; Persky D; Abraham I
    Future Oncol; 2021 Sep; 17(26):3485-3497. PubMed ID: 34241542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Retrospective evaluation of safety and effectiveness of same-day pegfilgrastim in patients with lung cancer.
    Alrawashdh N; Vraney J; Choi BM; Almutairi AR; Abraham I; McBride A
    Future Oncol; 2022 Jun; 18(19):2381-2390. PubMed ID: 35477322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative effectiveness of pegfilgrastim biosimilars vs originator for prevention of febrile neutropenia: A retrospective cohort study.
    Wang CY; Vouri SM; Park H; Heldermon CD; Brown JD
    J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2023 Feb; 29(2):119-127. PubMed ID: 36705287
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A single-arm, retrospective analysis of the incidence of febrile neutropenia using same-day versus next-day pegfilgrastim in patients with gastrointestinal cancers treated with FOLFOX or FOLFIRI.
    Eckstrom J; Bartels T; Abraham I; Patel H; Elquza E; Scott AJ; Malangone S; Hollings J; McBride A
    Support Care Cancer; 2019 Mar; 27(3):873-878. PubMed ID: 30090991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Observational study of the prevalence of febrile neutropenia in patients who received filgrastim or pegfilgrastim associated with 3-4 week chemotherapy regimens in community oncology practices.
    Morrison VA; Wong M; Hershman D; Campos LT; Ding B; Malin J
    J Manag Care Pharm; 2007 May; 13(4):337-48. PubMed ID: 17506600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Two decades of pegfilgrastim: what have we learned? Where do we go from here?
    De Oliveira Brandao C; Lewis S; Sandschafer D; Crawford J
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2023 May; 39(5):707-718. PubMed ID: 36976784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factors on febrile neutropenia during chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Wang L; Baser O; Kutikova L; Page JH; Barron R
    Support Care Cancer; 2015 Nov; 23(11):3131-40. PubMed ID: 25821144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating the safety and effectiveness of PegaGen
    Jenabian A; Ehsanpour A; Mortazavizadeh SMR; Raafat J; Razavi M; Khosravi A; Seifi S; Salimi B; Anjidani N; Kafi H
    Support Care Cancer; 2022 Oct; 30(10):8151-8158. PubMed ID: 35792924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A prospective cohort study to evaluate the incidence of febrile neutropenia in patients receiving pegfilgrastim on-body injector versus other options for prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia: breast cancer subgroup analysis.
    Mahtani RL; Belani R; Crawford J; Dale D; DeCosta L; Gawade PL; Huynh C; Lawrence T; Lewis S; MacLaughlin WW; Narang M; Rifkin R
    Support Care Cancer; 2022 Jul; 30(7):6135-6144. PubMed ID: 35426046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia with same-day versus next-day pegfilgrastim prophylaxis among patients aged ≥65 years: a retrospective evaluation using Medicare claims.
    Weycker D; Hanau A; Lonshteyn A; Bowers C; Bensink M; Garawin T; Chandler D
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2018 Sep; 34(9):1705-1711. PubMed ID: 29962268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prophylactic pegfilgrastim to prevent febrile neutropenia among patients receiving biweekly (Q2W) chemotherapy regimens: a systematic review of efficacy, effectiveness and safety.
    Mahtani R; Crawford J; Flannery SM; Lawrence T; Schenfeld J; Gawade PL
    BMC Cancer; 2021 May; 21(1):621. PubMed ID: 34044798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A prospective study to evaluate febrile neutropenia incidence in patients receiving pegfilgrastim on-body injector vs other choices.
    Rifkin RM; Crawford J; Mahtani RL; Dale DC; Narang M; MacLaughlin WW; Huynh C; Gawade PL; Lewis S; DeCosta L; Lawrence T; Belani R
    Support Care Cancer; 2022 Oct; 30(10):7913-7922. PubMed ID: 35732748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus filgrastim for prevention of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in patients with lymphoma: a systematic review.
    Gebremariam GT; Fentie AM; Beyene K; Sander B; Gebretekle GB
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2022 Dec; 22(1):1600. PubMed ID: 36585648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus 6-day filgrastim primary prophylaxis in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma receiving CHOP-21 in United States.
    Lyman G; Lalla A; Barron R; Dubois RW
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2009 Feb; 25(2):401-11. PubMed ID: 19192985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of effectiveness of biosimilar filgrastim (Nivestim™), reference Amgen filgrastim and pegfilgrastim in febrile neutropenia primary prevention in breast cancer patients treated with neo(adjuvant) TAC: a non-interventional cohort study.
    Brito M; Esteves S; André R; Isidoro M; Moreira A
    Support Care Cancer; 2016 Feb; 24(2):597-603. PubMed ID: 26111956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Trajectory of absolute neutrophil counts in patients treated with pegfilgrastim on the day of chemotherapy versus the day after chemotherapy.
    Li Y; Klippel Z; Shih X; Wang H; Reiner M; Page JH
    Cancer Chemother Pharmacol; 2016 Apr; 77(4):703-12. PubMed ID: 26886017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in cancer patients receiving pegfilgrastim prophylaxis: does timing of administration matter?
    Weycker D; Li X; Figueredo J; Barron R; Tzivelekis S; Hagiwara M
    Support Care Cancer; 2016 May; 24(5):2309-2316. PubMed ID: 26607482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effectiveness of biosimilar filgrastim vs. original granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in febrile neutropenia prevention in breast cancer patients.
    Puértolas I; Frutos Pérez-Surio A; Alcácera MA; Andrés R; Salvador MDT
    Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 2018 Mar; 74(3):315-321. PubMed ID: 29152672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patient out-of-pocket and payer costs for pegfilgrastim originator vs biosimilars as primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia in the first cycle among a commercially insured population.
    Wang CY; Park H; Heldermon CD; Vouri SM; Brown JD
    J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2022 Jul; 28(7):795-802. PubMed ID: 35737859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.