These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35709596)

  • 1. Efficient k-means clustering and greedy selection-based reduction of nodal search space for optimization of sensor placement in the water distribution networks.
    Gautam DK; Kotecha P; Subbiah S
    Water Res; 2022 Jul; 220():118666. PubMed ID: 35709596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Selecting the best location of water quality sensors in water distribution networks by considering the importance of nodes and contaminations using NSGA-III (case study: Zahedan water distribution network, Iran).
    Harif S; Azizyan G; Dehghani Darmian M; Givehchi M
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Apr; 30(18):53229-53252. PubMed ID: 36853532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimal sensor placement for leak location in water distribution networks: A feature selection method combined with graph signal processing.
    Cheng M; Li J
    Water Res; 2023 Aug; 242():120313. PubMed ID: 37451191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Graph Laplace Regularization-based pressure sensor placement strategy for leak localization in the water distribution networks under joint hydraulic and topological feature spaces.
    Cheng M; Li J; Wang C; Ye C; Chang Z
    Water Res; 2024 Jun; 257():121666. PubMed ID: 38703543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An efficient multi-objective optimization method for water quality sensor placement within water distribution systems considering contamination probability variations.
    He G; Zhang T; Zheng F; Zhang Q
    Water Res; 2018 Oct; 143():165-175. PubMed ID: 29945032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing the global resilience of water quality sensor placement strategies within water distribution systems.
    Zhang Q; Zheng F; Kapelan Z; Savic D; He G; Ma Y
    Water Res; 2020 Apr; 172():115527. PubMed ID: 32004913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Controllability analysis as a pre-selection method for sensor placement in water distribution systems.
    Diao K; Rauch W
    Water Res; 2013 Oct; 47(16):6097-108. PubMed ID: 23948563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robust sensor placement for sustainable leakage management in water distribution networks of developing economies: A hybrid decision support framework.
    Zaman D; Gupta AK; Uddameri V; Tiwari MK; Sen D
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Oct; 320():115816. PubMed ID: 35932744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An investigation of the possible scenarios for the optimal locating of quality sensors in the water distribution networks with uncertain contamination.
    Jafari H; Rajaee T; Nazif S
    J Water Health; 2020 Oct; 18(5):704-721. PubMed ID: 33095194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pressure Sensor Placement for Leak Localization in Water Distribution Networks Using Information Theory.
    Santos-Ruiz I; López-Estrada FR; Puig V; Valencia-Palomo G; Hernández HR
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jan; 22(2):. PubMed ID: 35062403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Locations of Sampling Stations for Water Quality Monitoring in Water Distribution Networks.
    Rathi S; Gupta R
    J Environ Sci Eng; 2014 Apr; 56(2):169-78. PubMed ID: 26563063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Method for optimal sensor placement in water distribution systems with nodal demand uncertainties].
    Liu SM; Wu X; Ouyang LY
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2013 Aug; 34(8):3108-12. PubMed ID: 24191555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Domain Knowledge-Based Evolutionary Reinforcement Learning for Sensor Placement.
    Song M; Hu C; Gong W; Yan X
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 May; 22(10):. PubMed ID: 35632207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of topological, empirical and optimization-based approaches for locating quality detection points in water distribution networks.
    Santonastaso GF; Di Nardo A; Creaco E; Musmarra D; Greco R
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Jul; 28(26):33844-33853. PubMed ID: 32851529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimal and objective placement of sensors in water distribution systems using information theory.
    Khorshidi MS; Nikoo MR; Sadegh M
    Water Res; 2018 Oct; 143():218-228. PubMed ID: 29960176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimal sensor placement for leak location in water distribution networks using genetic algorithms.
    Casillas MV; Puig V; Garza-Castañón LE; Rosich A
    Sensors (Basel); 2013 Nov; 13(11):14984-5005. PubMed ID: 24193099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Generative adversarial networks for detecting contamination events in water distribution systems using multi-parameter, multi-site water quality monitoring.
    Li Z; Liu H; Zhang C; Fu G
    Environ Sci Ecotechnol; 2023 Apr; 14():100231. PubMed ID: 36578363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Many-objective optimization model for the flexible design of water distribution networks.
    Marques J; Cunha M; Savić D
    J Environ Manage; 2018 Nov; 226():308-319. PubMed ID: 30125810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gated graph neural networks for identifying contamination sources in water distribution systems.
    Li Z; Liu H; Zhang C; Fu G
    J Environ Manage; 2024 Feb; 351():119806. PubMed ID: 38118345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Real-time water quality prediction in water distribution networks using graph neural networks with sparse monitoring data.
    Li Z; Liu H; Zhang C; Fu G
    Water Res; 2024 Feb; 250():121018. PubMed ID: 38113592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.