These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Recovery of 197 eukaryotic bins reveals major challenges for eukaryote genome reconstruction from terrestrial metagenomes. Saraiva JP; Bartholomäus A; Toscan RB; Baldrian P; Nunes da Rocha U Mol Ecol Resour; 2023 Jul; 23(5):1066-1076. PubMed ID: 36847735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Contigs directed gene annotation (ConDiGA) for accurate protein sequence database construction in metaproteomics. Wu E; Mallawaarachchi V; Zhao J; Yang Y; Liu H; Wang X; Shen C; Lin Y; Qiao L Microbiome; 2024 Mar; 12(1):58. PubMed ID: 38504332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The National Ecological Observatory Network's soil metagenomes: assembly and basic analysis. Werbin ZR; Hackos B; Lopez-Nava J; Dietze MC; Bhatnagar JM F1000Res; 2021; 10():299. PubMed ID: 35707452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. IMG/M: the integrated metagenome data management and comparative analysis system. Markowitz VM; Chen IM; Chu K; Szeto E; Palaniappan K; Grechkin Y; Ratner A; Jacob B; Pati A; Huntemann M; Liolios K; Pagani I; Anderson I; Mavromatis K; Ivanova NN; Kyrpides NC Nucleic Acids Res; 2012 Jan; 40(Database issue):D123-9. PubMed ID: 22086953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. VEBA: a modular end-to-end suite for in silico recovery, clustering, and analysis of prokaryotic, microeukaryotic, and viral genomes from metagenomes. Espinoza JL; Dupont CL BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Oct; 23(1):419. PubMed ID: 36224545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. From the High Arctic to the Equator: Do Soil Metagenomes Differ According to Our Expectations? Kerfahi D; Tripathi BM; Dong K; Kim M; Kim H; Ferry Slik JW; Go R; Adams JM Microb Ecol; 2019 Jan; 77(1):168-185. PubMed ID: 29882154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Metagenomes provide valuable comparative information on soil microeukaryotes. Jacquiod S; Stenbæk J; Santos SS; Winding A; Sørensen SJ; Priemé A Res Microbiol; 2016 Jun; 167(5):436-50. PubMed ID: 27020245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. SprayNPray: user-friendly taxonomic profiling of genome and metagenome contigs. Garber AI; Armbruster CR; Lee SE; Cooper VS; Bomberger JM; McAllister SM BMC Genomics; 2022 Mar; 23(1):202. PubMed ID: 35279076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessing the performance of different approaches for functional and taxonomic annotation of metagenomes. Tamames J; Cobo-Simón M; Puente-Sánchez F BMC Genomics; 2019 Dec; 20(1):960. PubMed ID: 31823721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Identifying Eukaryotes and Factors Influencing Their Biogeography in Drinking Water Metagenomes. Gabrielli M; Dai Z; Delafont V; Timmers PHA; van der Wielen PWJJ; Antonelli M; Pinto AJ Environ Sci Technol; 2023 Mar; 57(9):3645-3660. PubMed ID: 36827617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Metagenomic analyses reveal no differences in genes involved in cellulose degradation under different tillage treatments. de Vries M; Schöler A; Ertl J; Xu Z; Schloter M FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2015 Jul; 91(7):. PubMed ID: 26109134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Topographically Distinguished Microbiome Taxonomy and Stress-Response Genes of Royal Belum Rainforest and Raja Muda Musa Peat Swamp Revealed through Metagenomic Inquisition. Ahmad MF; Abdullah H; Hassan MN; Jamaludin MI; Sivam A; Komatsu K; Sapian IS; Alias H; Mat Isa MN; Kuwahara VS; Yaacob NS Int J Mol Sci; 2023 Jan; 24(1):. PubMed ID: 36614337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]