These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35710930)

  • 21. Auditory equiprobable NoGo P3: A single-trial latency-adjusted ERP analysis.
    Fogarty JS; Barry RJ; Steiner-Lim GZ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2022 Dec; 182():90-104. PubMed ID: 36216120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Inhibitory processing during the Go/NoGo task: an ERP analysis of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
    Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Jun; 115(6):1320-31. PubMed ID: 15134699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A large scale (N=102) functional neuroimaging study of response inhibition in a Go/NoGo task.
    Steele VR; Aharoni E; Munro GE; Calhoun VD; Nyalakanti P; Stevens MC; Pearlson G; Kiehl KA
    Behav Brain Res; 2013 Nov; 256():529-36. PubMed ID: 23756137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Identification of selection and inhibition components in a Go/NoGo task from EEG spectra using a machine learning classifier.
    DeLaRosa BL; Spence JS; Motes MA; To W; Vanneste S; Kraut MA; Hart J
    Brain Behav; 2020 Dec; 10(12):e01902. PubMed ID: 33078586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The development of stop-signal and Go/Nogo response inhibition in children aged 7-12 years: performance and event-related potential indices.
    Johnstone SJ; Dimoska A; Smith JL; Barry RJ; Pleffer CB; Chiswick D; Clarke AR
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Jan; 63(1):25-38. PubMed ID: 16919346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Temporal constraints of behavioral inhibition: relevance of inter-stimulus interval in a Go-Nogo task.
    Zamorano F; Billeke P; Hurtado JM; López V; Carrasco X; Ossandón T; Aboitiz F
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e87232. PubMed ID: 24489875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Emotional arousal elicited by irrelevant stimuli affects event-related potentials (ERPs) during response inhibition.
    Zhao D; Lin H; Xie S; Liu Z
    Physiol Behav; 2019 Jul; 206():134-142. PubMed ID: 30954488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Sequential processing in an auditory equiprobable Go/NoGo task with variable interstimulus interval.
    Borchard JP; Barry RJ; De Blasio FM
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Aug; 97(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 26024616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A large scale (N=102) functional neuroimaging study of error processing in a Go/NoGo task.
    Steele VR; Claus ED; Aharoni E; Harenski C; Calhoun VD; Pearlson G; Kiehl KA
    Behav Brain Res; 2014 Jul; 268():127-38. PubMed ID: 24726752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Neural correlates of proactive and reactive inhibition of saccadic eye movements.
    Talanow T; Kasparbauer AM; Lippold JV; Weber B; Ettinger U
    Brain Imaging Behav; 2020 Feb; 14(1):72-88. PubMed ID: 30298238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The usefulness of partial information: effects of go probability in the choice/Nogo task.
    Low KA; Miller J
    Psychophysiology; 1999 May; 36(3):288-97. PubMed ID: 10352552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Movement-related potentials in the Go/NoGo task: the P3 reflects both cognitive and motor inhibition.
    Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Mar; 119(3):704-714. PubMed ID: 18164657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Differences in blood flow between auditory and visual stimuli in the Psychomotor Vigilance Task and GO/NOGO Task.
    Hiroyasu T; Fukushima A; Yokouchi H
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():1466-9. PubMed ID: 23366178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effects of exposure to traumatic stressors on inhibitory control in police officers: a dense electrode array study using a Go/NoGo continuous performance task.
    Covey TJ; Shucard JL; Violanti JM; Lee J; Shucard DW
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):363-75. PubMed ID: 23528305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Somato-motor inhibitory processing in humans: a study with MEG and ERP.
    Nakata H; Inui K; Wasaka T; Akatsuka K; Kakigi R
    Eur J Neurosci; 2005 Oct; 22(7):1784-92. PubMed ID: 16197519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effect of age on N2 and P3 components: A meta-analysis of Go/Nogo tasks.
    Cheng CH; Tsai HY; Cheng HN
    Brain Cogn; 2019 Oct; 135():103574. PubMed ID: 31200173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A supramodal limbic-paralimbic-neocortical network supports goal-directed stimulus processing.
    Laurens KR; Kiehl KA; Liddle PF
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2005 Jan; 24(1):35-49. PubMed ID: 15593271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Sequence effects in the Go/NoGo task: inhibition and facilitation.
    Thomas SJ; Gonsalvez CJ; Johnstone SJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Dec; 74(3):209-19. PubMed ID: 19751776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparative analysis of event-related potentials during Go/NoGo and CPT: decomposition of electrophysiological markers of response inhibition and sustained attention.
    Kirmizi-Alsan E; Bayraktaroglu Z; Gurvit H; Keskin YH; Emre M; Demiralp T
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1104(1):114-28. PubMed ID: 16824492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A processing schema for children in the auditory equiprobable Go/NoGo task: ERP components and behaviour.
    Barry RJ; De Blasio FM; Fogarty JS
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Jan; 123():74-79. PubMed ID: 29122654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.