158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35711880)
1. Repeat Breast Ultrasound Demonstrates Utility with Added Cancer Detection in Patients following Breast Imaging Second Opinion Recommendations.
Jared Weinfurtner R; Mallory MA; Bermudez D
Breast J; 2022; 2022():1561455. PubMed ID: 35711880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Specialized Second Opinion Interpretations of Breast Imaging: Impact on Additional Workup and Management.
Weinfurtner RJ; Niell B; Mekhail Y; Aguila E; Kamat L
Clin Breast Cancer; 2018 Oct; 18(5):e1031-e1036. PubMed ID: 29625911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Specialized Second Opinion Review of Breast MRI Impacts Management and Increases Cancer Detection.
Weinfurtner RJ; Mooney B; Forbus J
J Am Coll Radiol; 2019 Jul; 16(7):922-927. PubMed ID: 30833163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of Second-Opinion Interpretation of Breast Imaging Studies in Patients Not Currently Diagnosed With Breast Cancer.
Chang Sen LQ; Mayo RC; Lesslie MD; Yang WT; Leung JWT
J Am Coll Radiol; 2018 Jul; 15(7):980-987.e1. PubMed ID: 29789230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Systematic second opinion review of outside imaging in breast cancer diagnosis: An added value].
Boudier J; Oldrini G; Henrot P; Salleron J; Lesur A
Bull Cancer; 2019 Apr; 106(4):316-327. PubMed ID: 30885367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Second opinion interpretation of breast ultrasound images-Is it worth another look?
Horvat JV; D'Alessio DD; Bernard-Davila B; Martinez DF; Morris EA
Clin Imaging; 2018; 52():79-87. PubMed ID: 30005207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Second-Opinion Review of Breast Imaging at a Cancer Center: Is It Worthwhile?
Coffey K; D'Alessio D; Keating DM; Morris EA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jun; 208(6):1386-1391. PubMed ID: 28301207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Impact of Patient-Initiated Subspecialty Review on Patient Care.
Coffey K; Mango V; Keating DM; Morris EA; D'Alessio D
J Am Coll Radiol; 2018 Aug; 15(8):1109-1115. PubMed ID: 30078435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical Impact of Second Opinion Radiology Consultation for Patients With Breast Cancer.
Whorms DS; Giess CS; Golshan M; Freedman RA; Bunnell CA; Alper EC; Losk K; Khorasani R
J Am Coll Radiol; 2019 Jun; 16(6):814-823. PubMed ID: 30579707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Probably benign lesions at screening breast US in a population with elevated risk: prevalence and rate of malignancy in the ACRIN 6666 trial.
Barr RG; Zhang Z; Cormack JB; Mendelson EB; Berg WA
Radiology; 2013 Dec; 269(3):701-12. PubMed ID: 23962417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The connecticut experiments second year: ultrasound in the screening of women with dense breasts.
Weigert J; Steenbergen S
Breast J; 2015; 21(2):175-80. PubMed ID: 25683369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. BI-RADS Category 5 Assessments at Diagnostic Breast Imaging:Outcomes Analysis Based on Lesion Descriptors.
Yao MM; Joe BN; Sickles EA; Lee CS
Acad Radiol; 2019 Aug; 26(8):1048-1052. PubMed ID: 30195413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Breast Imaging Outcomes following Abnormal Thermography.
Neal CH; Flynt KA; Jeffries DO; Helvie MA
Acad Radiol; 2018 Mar; 25(3):273-278. PubMed ID: 29275941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Characteristics, Malignancy Rate, and Follow-up of BI-RADS Category 3 Lesions Identified at Breast MR Imaging: Implications for MR Image Interpretation and Management.
Chikarmane SA; Birdwell RL; Poole PS; Sippo DA; Giess CS
Radiology; 2016 Sep; 280(3):707-15. PubMed ID: 27089027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Growing BI-RADS category 3 lesions on follow-up breast ultrasound: malignancy rates and worrisome features.
Ha SM; Chae EY; Cha JH; Shin HJ; Choi WJ; Kim HH
Br J Radiol; 2018 Jul; 91(1087):20170787. PubMed ID: 29658793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can second-look ultrasound downgrade MRI-detected lesions? A retrospective study.
Kolta M; Clauser P; Kapetas P; Bernathova M; Pinker K; Helbich TH; Baltzer PAT
Eur J Radiol; 2020 Jun; 127():108976. PubMed ID: 32339982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reassessment and Follow-Up Results of BI-RADS Category 3 Lesions Detected on Screening Breast Ultrasound.
Chae EY; Cha JH; Shin HJ; Choi WJ; Kim HH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Mar; 206(3):666-72. PubMed ID: 26901026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Second Opinion May Reduce the Number of Unnecessary Prostate Biopsies: Time to Improve Radiologists' Training Program?
Luzzago S; Petralia G; Musi G; Catellani M; Alessi S; Di Trapani E; Mistretta FA; Serino A; Conti A; Pricolo P; Nazzani S; Mirone V; Matei DV; Montanari E; de Cobelli O
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2019 Apr; 17(2):88-96. PubMed ID: 30527286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Application of a second opinion ultrasound in Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 4A cases: can immediate biopsy be avoided?
Cai Y; Zhu C; Chen Q; Zhao F; Guo S
J Int Med Res; 2021 Jun; 49(6):3000605211024452. PubMed ID: 34162260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
