These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3571298)

  • 21. Crack-growth properties of various elastomers with potential application in small joint prostheses.
    Hutchinson DT; Savory KM; Bachus KN
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1997 Oct; 37(1):94-9. PubMed ID: 9335353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Mechanical properties of the fibrous tissue found at the bone-cement interface following total joint replacement.
    Hori RY; Lewis JL
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1982 Nov; 16(6):911-27. PubMed ID: 7174716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Uncemented femoral revision arthroplasty using the modular revision prosthesis MRP-TITAN revision stem.
    Mumme T; Müller-Rath R; Andereya S; Wirtz DC
    Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2007 Mar; 19(1):56-77. PubMed ID: 17345027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of various reinforcements for maxillofacial silicone elastomers.
    Andreopoulos AG; Evangelatou M
    J Biomater Appl; 1994 Apr; 8(4):344-60. PubMed ID: 8064589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Photoelastic stress analysis of silastic poppets in prosthetic heart valves.
    Greenfield H; Hampton T; Gascoigne H; Kolff W
    Circ Res; 1973 Jan; 32(1):59-70. PubMed ID: 4684129
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Biochemical changes in knee joint articular cartilage after cemented prosthetic hip hemiarthroplasty in dogs.
    Papatheofanis FJ; Barmada R
    Artif Organs; 1991 Oct; 15(5):414-9. PubMed ID: 1741688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. New design for Silastic implants in temporomandibular joint surgery.
    Rippert ET; Flanigan TJ; Middlebrooks ML
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1986 Feb; 44(2):163-4. PubMed ID: 3456029
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Stresses on the femur following hip joint replacement].
    Rohlmann A; Mössner U; Bergmann G; Hees G; Kölbel R
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1983; 121(1):47-57. PubMed ID: 6845829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Porosity of maxillofacial silicone elastomers and microleakage pattern of the commercially pure Ti-silicone elastomer interface after hydrothermal cycling.
    Artopoulou II; Chambers MS; Eliades G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Dec; 116(6):937-942. PubMed ID: 27460319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Bending stiffness, torsional stability, and insertion force of cementless femoral stems.
    Incavo SJ; Johnson CC; Churchill DL; Beynnon BD
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2001 Apr; 30(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 11334454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Material optimisation of the femoral component of a hip prosthesis based on the fatigue notch fatigue approach.
    Hedia HS; Barton DC; Fisher J
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1997; 7(2):83-98. PubMed ID: 9262822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Biomechanical analysis and quantitative analysis of bone scintigraphy on thrust plate hip prosthesis.
    Goto T; Yasunaga Y; Takahashi K; Ochi M
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2004 Jul; 124(6):357-62. PubMed ID: 15108008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of nano-oxide concentration on the mechanical properties of a maxillofacial silicone elastomer.
    Han Y; Kiat-amnuay S; Powers JM; Zhao Y
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):465-73. PubMed ID: 19033031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Elbow joint contact study: comparison of techniques.
    Stormont TJ; An KN; Morrey BF; Chao EY
    J Biomech; 1985; 18(5):329-36. PubMed ID: 4008503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Mechanical properties and bonding of maxillofacial silicone elastomers.
    Hatamleh MM; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2010 Feb; 26(2):185-91. PubMed ID: 19892390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Does a PEEK Femoral TKA Implant Preserve Intact Femoral Surface Strains Compared With CoCr? A Preliminary Laboratory Study.
    Rankin KE; Dickinson AS; Briscoe A; Browne M
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Nov; 474(11):2405-2413. PubMed ID: 27020431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The influence of design parameters on calcar stresses following femoral head arthroplasty.
    Cook SD; Klawitter JJ; Weinstein AM
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1980 Mar; 14(2):133-44. PubMed ID: 7358741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Correlation between femoral neck version and strain on the femur after insertion of femoral prosthesis.
    Umeda N; Saito M; Sugano N; Ohzono K; Nishii T; Sakai T; Yoshikawa H; Ikeda D; Murakami A
    J Orthop Sci; 2003; 8(3):381-6. PubMed ID: 12768482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Fatigue behavior of titanium femoral hip prosthesis with proximal sleeve-stem modularity.
    Krygier JJ; Dujovne AR; Bobyn JD
    J Appl Biomater; 1994; 5(3):195-201. PubMed ID: 10147445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Replacement of the distal radius joint surface with silicone rubber in animal experiments on monkeys].
    Feldmeier C; Wilhelm K; Wunderlich E
    Z Plast Chir; 1981 Sep; 5(3):173-7. PubMed ID: 6795845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.