These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35713673)

  • 1. Robotic sacrohysteropexy: an instructional video for uterovaginal prolapse repair in patients with desired uterine preservation.
    Warehime J; Cope Z; Feroz R; Lenger SM; Gupta A; Francis S
    Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Dec; 33(12):3585-3586. PubMed ID: 35713673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laparoscopic Uterosacral Suture Sacrohysteropexy: LUSSH Procedure.
    Jan H; Ghai V
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019 Feb; 26(2):356-357. PubMed ID: 29631010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Vaginal and laparoscopic mesh hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse: a parallel cohort study.
    Gutman RE; Rardin CR; Sokol ER; Matthews C; Park AJ; Iglesia CB; Geoffrion R; Sokol AI; Karram M; Cundiff GW; Blomquist JL; Barber MD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):38.e1-38.e11. PubMed ID: 27596620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Uterine preservation vs hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines.
    Meriwether KV; Antosh DD; Olivera CK; Kim-Fine S; Balk EM; Murphy M; Grimes CL; Sleemi A; Singh R; Dieter AA; Crisp CC; Rahn DD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Aug; 219(2):129-146.e2. PubMed ID: 29353031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Success rates and outcomes of laparoscopic mesh sacrohysteropexy.
    Daniels S; Robson D; Palacz M; Howell S; Nguyen T; Behnia-Willison F
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Apr; 60(2):244-249. PubMed ID: 31840811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Simplified Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy.
    Jan H; Ghai V; Thakar R
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(7):1134. PubMed ID: 29371171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sacrohysteropexy: A Way to Spare the Uterus.
    Labanca L; Centini G; Lazzeri L; Afors K; Argay IM; Habib N; Zupi E
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(6):1254-1255. PubMed ID: 31838275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: a multicenter randomized controlled non-inferiority trial comparing laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy with vaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy (LAVA-trial, study protocol).
    van IJsselmuiden MN; Coolen AL; Detollenaere RJ; den Boon J; Bongers M; van de Pol G; Vollebregt A; Radder CM; Deprest J; van Eijndhoven HW
    BMC Womens Health; 2014 Sep; 14():112. PubMed ID: 25231240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Laparoscopic cervicopexy for correction of apical genital prolapse in 10 steps: a pilot study.
    Paolo C; Alessandro A; Salucci P; Diego R; Renato S
    Int Urogynecol J; 2021 May; 32(5):1313-1316. PubMed ID: 32975602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy: the Pilsner modification.
    Kalis V; Rusavy Z; Ismail KM
    Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Jun; 31(6):1277-1280. PubMed ID: 31802161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Vaginal Sacral Colpopexy: A Natural Orifice Approach to a Gold Standard Procedure.
    Hanes CR
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 28642090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hysteropexy: an Option for the Repair of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
    Bradley S; Gutman RE; Richter LA
    Curr Urol Rep; 2018 Feb; 19(2):15. PubMed ID: 29476274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sacrospinous hysteropexy with a low weight transvaginal polypropylene mesh for treatment of complete uterovaginal eversion.
    Achermann APP; Brazão ÉS; Riccetto CLZ; Palma PCR
    Int Braz J Urol; 2019; 45(4):856-857. PubMed ID: 30735341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sacrocolpopexy for treatment of vaginal apical prolapse: evidence-based surgery.
    Parkes IL; Shveiky D
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(4):546-57. PubMed ID: 24462593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Native tissue sacrospinous hysteropexy from an anterior approach.
    Plair A; Matthews C
    Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Jun; 32(6):1591-1593. PubMed ID: 33219824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transvaginal mesh removal with native-tissue repair for mesh shrinkage and recurrent uterovaginal prolapse following vaginal mesh-augmented surgery.
    Milani R; Frigerio M; Palmieri S; Manodoro S
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 Oct; 139(1):105-106. PubMed ID: 28653332
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Guideline No. 413: Surgical Management of Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Women.
    Geoffrion R; Larouche M
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2021 Apr; 43(4):511-523.e1. PubMed ID: 33548503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Laparoscopic Pectopexy with Burch Colposuspension for Pelvic Prolapse Associated with Stress Urinary Incontinence.
    Pirtea L; Balint O; Secoșan C; Grigoraș D; Ilina R
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(5):1023-1024. PubMed ID: 31683027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sacrohysteropexy with synthetic mesh for the management of uterovaginal prolapse.
    Leron E; Stanton SL
    BJOG; 2001 Jun; 108(6):629-33. PubMed ID: 11426899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus sacrospinous hysteropexy-a multicentre randomised controlled trial (LAVA trial).
    van IJsselmuiden MN; van Oudheusden A; Veen J; van de Pol G; Vollebregt A; Radder CM; Housmans S; van Kuijk S; Deprest J; Bongers MY; van Eijndhoven H
    BJOG; 2020 Sep; 127(10):1284-1293. PubMed ID: 32267624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.