BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35713889)

  • 1. Optimal analytical strategies for sensitive and quantitative phosphoproteomics using TMT-based multiplexing.
    Koenig C; Martinez-Val A; Franciosa G; Olsen JV
    Proteomics; 2022 Oct; 22(19-20):e2100245. PubMed ID: 35713889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Protocol for high-throughput semi-automated label-free- or TMT-based phosphoproteome profiling.
    Koenig C; Martinez-Val A; Naicker P; Stoychev S; Jordaan J; Olsen JV
    STAR Protoc; 2023 Sep; 4(3):102536. PubMed ID: 37659085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A streamlined tandem tip-based workflow for sensitive nanoscale phosphoproteomics.
    Tsai CF; Wang YT; Hsu CC; Kitata RB; Chu RK; Velickovic M; Zhao R; Williams SM; Chrisler WB; Jorgensen ML; Moore RJ; Zhu Y; Rodland KD; Smith RD; Wasserfall CH; Shi T; Liu T
    Commun Biol; 2023 Jan; 6(1):70. PubMed ID: 36653408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Off-line high-pH reversed-phase fractionation for in-depth phosphoproteomics.
    Batth TS; Francavilla C; Olsen JV
    J Proteome Res; 2014 Dec; 13(12):6176-86. PubMed ID: 25338131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. High pH Reversed-Phase Micro-Columns for Simple, Sensitive, and Efficient Fractionation of Proteome and (TMT labeled) Phosphoproteome Digests.
    Ruprecht B; Zecha J; Zolg DP; Kuster B
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1550():83-98. PubMed ID: 28188525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nanoscale Solid-Phase Isobaric Labeling for Multiplexed Quantitative Phosphoproteomics.
    Ogata K; Tsai CF; Ishihama Y
    J Proteome Res; 2021 Aug; 20(8):4193-4202. PubMed ID: 34292731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Offline pentafluorophenyl (PFP)-RP prefractionation as an alternative to high-pH RP for comprehensive LC-MS/MS proteomics and phosphoproteomics.
    Grassetti AV; Hards R; Gerber SA
    Anal Bioanal Chem; 2017 Jul; 409(19):4615-4625. PubMed ID: 28555341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Benchmarking common quantification strategies for large-scale phosphoproteomics.
    Hogrebe A; von Stechow L; Bekker-Jensen DB; Weinert BT; Kelstrup CD; Olsen JV
    Nat Commun; 2018 Mar; 9(1):1045. PubMed ID: 29535314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics for Analysis of Hydrophilic Phosphopeptides.
    Tsai CF; Smith JS; Eiger DS; Martin K; Liu T; Smith RD; Shi T; Rajagopal S; Jacobs JM
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2259():247-257. PubMed ID: 33687720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sample Preparation for Relative Quantitation of Proteins Using Tandem Mass Tags (TMT) and Mass Spectrometry (MS).
    Erdjument-Bromage H; Huang FK; Neubert TA
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1741():135-149. PubMed ID: 29392697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Peptide Labeling Using Isobaric Tagging Reagents for Quantitative Phosphoproteomics.
    Cheng L; Pisitkun T; Knepper MA; Hoffert JD
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1355():53-70. PubMed ID: 26584918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Protein Quantification in a Complex Background by DIA and TMT Workflows with Fixed Instrument Time.
    Muntel J; Kirkpatrick J; Bruderer R; Huang T; Vitek O; Ori A; Reiter L
    J Proteome Res; 2019 Mar; 18(3):1340-1351. PubMed ID: 30726097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Isoelectric point-based fractionation by HiRIEF coupled to LC-MS allows for in-depth quantitative analysis of the phosphoproteome.
    Panizza E; Branca RMM; Oliviusson P; Orre LM; Lehtiö J
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jul; 7(1):4513. PubMed ID: 28674419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Complementary workflow for global phosphoproteome analysis.
    Li QR; Ning ZB; Yang XL; Wu JR; Zeng R
    Electrophoresis; 2012 Nov; 33(22):3291-8. PubMed ID: 23097065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fractionation of Enriched Phosphopeptides Using pH/Acetonitrile-Gradient-Reversed-Phase Microcolumn Separation in Combination with LC-MS/MS Analysis.
    Ondrej M; Rehulka P; Rehulkova H; Kupcik R; Tichy A
    Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Jun; 21(11):. PubMed ID: 32492839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tandem Mass Tag-Based Phosphoproteomics in Plants.
    Vélez-Bermúdez IC; Jain D; Ravindran A; Chen CW; Hsu CC; Schmidt W
    Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2581():309-319. PubMed ID: 36413327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. DeepPhospho accelerates DIA phosphoproteome profiling through in silico library generation.
    Lou R; Liu W; Li R; Li S; He X; Shui W
    Nat Commun; 2021 Nov; 12(1):6685. PubMed ID: 34795227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Systematic Optimization of Automated Phosphopeptide Enrichment for High-Sensitivity Phosphoproteomics.
    Bortel P; Piga I; Koenig C; Gerner C; Martinez-Val A; Olsen JV
    Mol Cell Proteomics; 2024 May; 23(5):100754. PubMed ID: 38548019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Isobaric Labeling-Based LC-MS/MS Strategy for Comprehensive Profiling of Human Pancreatic Tissue Proteome.
    Liu CW; Zhang Q
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1788():215-224. PubMed ID: 28986817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A data-independent acquisition-based global phosphoproteomics system enables deep profiling.
    Kitata RB; Choong WK; Tsai CF; Lin PY; Chen BS; Chang YC; Nesvizhskii AI; Sung TY; Chen YJ
    Nat Commun; 2021 May; 12(1):2539. PubMed ID: 33953186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.