These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3571470)

  • 1. Evaluation of YeastIdent and Uni-Yeast-Tek yeast identification systems.
    Salkin IF; Land GA; Hurd NJ; Goldson PR; McGinnis MR
    J Clin Microbiol; 1987 Apr; 25(4):624-7. PubMed ID: 3571470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Identification of yeast-like fungi: evaluation of 4 commercial systems].
    Russolo S; Sala A; Crotti D
    Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1984 Dec; 20(4):372-8. PubMed ID: 6399580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Conventional and rapid methods for yeast identification.
    Lin CC; Fung DY
    Crit Rev Microbiol; 1987; 14(4):273-89. PubMed ID: 3308316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Evaluation of common commercial systems for the identification of yeast isolates in microbiology laboratories: a multicenter study].
    Karabıçak N; Uludağ Altun H; Karatuna O; Hazırolan G; Aksu N; Adiloğlu A; Akyar I
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 2015 Apr; 49(2):210-20. PubMed ID: 26167821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of simplified and commercial systems for identification of foodborne yeasts.
    Deák T; Beuchat LR
    Int J Food Microbiol; 1988 Oct; 7(2):135-45. PubMed ID: 3079471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Limitations of the current microbial identification system for identification of clinical yeast isolates.
    Kellogg JA; Bankert DA; Chaturvedi V
    J Clin Microbiol; 1998 May; 36(5):1197-200. PubMed ID: 9574676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of four commercial biochemical test systems for identification of yeasts.
    Bergan T; Hollum AB; Vangdal M
    Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Aug; 1(4):217-22. PubMed ID: 6756911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the Uni-Yeast-Tek kit for the identification of medically important yeasts.
    Bowman PI; Ahearn DG
    J Clin Microbiol; 1975 Oct; 2(4):354-8. PubMed ID: 1102563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of Abbott Quantum II yeast identification system.
    Salkin IF; Schadow KH; Bankaitis LA; McGinnis MR; Kemna ME
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Sep; 22(3):442-4. PubMed ID: 3900130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the Baxter-MicroScan 4-hour enzyme-based yeast identification system.
    Land GA; Salkin IF; el-Zaatari M; McGinnis MR; Hashem G
    J Clin Microbiol; 1991 Apr; 29(4):718-22. PubMed ID: 1653786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative study of seven commercial yeast identification systems.
    Verweij PE; Breuker IM; Rijs AJ; Meis JF
    J Clin Pathol; 1999 Apr; 52(4):271-3. PubMed ID: 10474518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of four commercialized biochemical systems for clinical yeast identification by colour-producing reactions.
    Paugam A; Benchetrit M; Fiacre A; Tourte-Schaefer C; Dupouy-Camet J
    Med Mycol; 1999 Feb; 37(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 10200929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficacy of API 20C and ID 32C systems for identification of common and rare clinical yeast isolates.
    Ramani R; Gromadzki S; Pincus DH; Salkin IF; Chaturvedi V
    J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Nov; 36(11):3396-8. PubMed ID: 9774605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of three commercial systems for identification of yeasts commonly isolated in the clinical microbiology laboratory.
    Wadlin JK; Hanko G; Stewart R; Pape J; Nachamkin I
    J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Jun; 37(6):1967-70. PubMed ID: 10325356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of a modified dye pour-plate auxanographic method for the rapid identification of clinically significant yeasts. Comparison with two commercial systems.
    Weymann LH; Stager CE; Qadri SG; Villarreal A; Qadri SM
    Med Microbiol Immunol; 1979 Mar; 167(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 375051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the Quantum II, API Yeast Ident, and AutoMicrobic systems for identification of clinical yeast isolates.
    Pfaller MA; Preston T; Bale M; Koontz FP; Body BA
    J Clin Microbiol; 1988 Oct; 26(10):2054-8. PubMed ID: 3182994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of commercial systems for the identification of clinical yeast isolates.
    Bowman PI; Ahearn DG
    J Clin Microbiol; 1976 Jul; 4(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 956362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the RapID Yeast Plus System for the identification of yeast.
    Moghaddas J; Truant AL; Jordan C; Buckley HR
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1999 Dec; 35(4):271-3. PubMed ID: 10668585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the AUXACOLOR system, a new method of clinical yeast identification.
    Davey KG; Chant PM; Downer CS; Campbell CK; Warnock DW
    J Clin Pathol; 1995 Sep; 48(9):807-9. PubMed ID: 7490311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical evaluation of the Uni-Yeast-Tek system for rapid presumptive identification of medically important yeasts.
    Cooper BH; Johnson JB; Thaxton ES
    J Clin Microbiol; 1978 Apr; 7(4):349-55. PubMed ID: 357442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.