BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35715080)

  • 1. Pacing Optimized by Left Ventricular dP/dt
    Elliott MK; Mehta VS; Rinaldi CA
    Card Electrophysiol Clin; 2022 Jun; 14(2):223-232. PubMed ID: 35715080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Characterization of ventricular activation pattern and acute hemodynamics during multipoint left ventricular pacing.
    Menardi E; Ballari GP; Goletto C; Rossetti G; Vado A
    Heart Rhythm; 2015 Aug; 12(8):1762-9. PubMed ID: 25916565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acute biventricular hemodynamic effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy in right bundle branch block.
    Houston BA; Sturdivant JL; Yu Y; Gold MR
    Heart Rhythm; 2018 Oct; 15(10):1525-1532. PubMed ID: 29800750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Haemodynamic effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy using single-vein, three-pole, multipoint left ventricular pacing in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy and a left ventricular free wall scar: the MAESTRO study.
    Umar F; Taylor RJ; Stegemann B; Marshall H; Flannigan S; Lencioni M; De Bono J; Griffith M; Leyva F
    Europace; 2016 Aug; 18(8):1227-34. PubMed ID: 26718535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Determination of the longest intrapatient left ventricular electrical delay may predict acute hemodynamic improvement in patients after cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Zanon F; Baracca E; Pastore G; Fraccaro C; Roncon L; Aggio S; Noventa F; Mazza A; Prinzen F
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2014 Jun; 7(3):377-83. PubMed ID: 24668162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A simultaneous X-Ray/MRI and noncontact mapping study of the acute hemodynamic effect of left ventricular endocardial and epicardial cardiac resynchronization therapy in humans.
    Ginks MR; Lambiase PD; Duckett SG; Bostock J; Chinchapatnam P; Rhode K; McPhail MJ; Simon M; Bucknall C; Carr-White G; Razavi R; Rinaldi CA
    Circ Heart Fail; 2011 Mar; 4(2):170-9. PubMed ID: 21216832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hemodynamic Optimization in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Should We Aim for dP/dt
    Zweerink A; Salden OAE; van Everdingen WM; de Roest GJ; van de Ven PM; Cramer MJ; Doevendans PA; van Rossum AC; Vernooy K; Prinzen FW; Meine M; Allaart CP
    JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2019 Sep; 5(9):1013-1025. PubMed ID: 31537329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Vector selection of a quadripolar left ventricular pacing lead affects acute hemodynamic response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a randomized cross-over trial.
    Asbach S; Hartmann M; Wengenmayer T; Graf E; Bode C; Biermann J
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(6):e67235. PubMed ID: 23826245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Determinants of LV dP/dt
    Odland HH; Holm T; Gammelsrud LO; Cornelussen R; Kongsgaard E
    Open Heart; 2021 May; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 33963078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of left ventricular electrical delay on the acute hemodynamic response with cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Gold MR; Leman RB; Wold N; Sturdivant JL; Yu Y
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2014 Jun; 25(6):624-30. PubMed ID: 24446891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Acute haemodynamic comparison of multisite and biventricular pacing with a quadripolar left ventricular lead.
    Thibault B; Dubuc M; Khairy P; Guerra PG; Macle L; Rivard L; Roy D; Talajic M; Karst E; Ryu K; Paiement P; Farazi TG
    Europace; 2013 Jul; 15(7):984-91. PubMed ID: 23447571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term reverse remodeling by cardiac resynchronization therapy with MultiPoint Pacing: A feasibility study of noninvasive hemodynamics-guided device programming.
    Lercher P; Lunati M; Rordorf R; Landolina M; Badie N; Qu F; Casset C; Ryu K; Ghio S; Singh JP; Leclercq C
    Heart Rhythm; 2018 Dec; 15(12):1766-1774. PubMed ID: 29940305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multipoint left ventricular pacing improves response to cardiac resynchronization therapy with and without pressure-volume loop optimization: comparison of the long-term efficacy of two different programming strategies.
    Ciconte G; Ćalović Ž; McSpadden LC; Ryu K; Mangual J; Caporaso I; Baldi M; Saviano M; Cuko A; Vitale R; Conti M; Giannelli L; Vicedomini G; Santinelli V; Pappone C
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2019 Mar; 54(2):141-149. PubMed ID: 30483980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multipoint pacing by a left ventricular quadripolar lead improves the acute hemodynamic response to CRT compared with conventional biventricular pacing at any site.
    Zanon F; Baracca E; Pastore G; Marcantoni L; Fraccaro C; Lanza D; Picariello C; Aggio S; Roncon L; Dell'Avvocata F; Rigatelli G; Pacetta D; Noventa F; Prinzen FW
    Heart Rhythm; 2015 May; 12(5):975-81. PubMed ID: 25625721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Body surface mapping using an ECG belt to characterize electrical heterogeneity for different left ventricular pacing sites during cardiac resynchronization: Relationship with acute hemodynamic improvement.
    Johnson WB; Vatterott PJ; Peterson MA; Bagwe S; Underwood RD; Bank AJ; Gage RM; Ramza B; Foreman BW; Splett V; Haddad T; Gillberg JM; Ghosh S
    Heart Rhythm; 2017 Mar; 14(3):385-391. PubMed ID: 27871987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimization of left ventricular pacing site plus multipoint pacing improves remodeling and clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy at 1 year.
    Zanon F; Marcantoni L; Baracca E; Pastore G; Lanza D; Fraccaro C; Picariello C; Conte L; Aggio S; Roncon L; Pacetta D; Badie N; Noventa F; Prinzen FW
    Heart Rhythm; 2016 Aug; 13(8):1644-51. PubMed ID: 27450156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multipoint left ventricular pacing with large anatomical separation improves reverse remodeling and response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in responders and non-responders to conventional biventricular pacing.
    Schiedat F; Schöne D; Aweimer A; Bösche L; Ewers A; Gotzmann M; Patsalis PC; Mügge A; Kloppe A
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2020 Feb; 109(2):183-193. PubMed ID: 31152199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Benefits of endocardial and multisite pacing are dependent on the type of left ventricular electric activation pattern and presence of ischemic heart disease: insights from electroanatomic mapping.
    Ginks MR; Shetty AK; Lambiase PD; Duckett SG; Bostock J; Peacock JL; Rhode KS; Bucknall C; Gill J; Taggart P; Leclercq C; Carr-White GS; Razavi R; Rinaldi CA
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2012 Oct; 5(5):889-97. PubMed ID: 22832673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Endocardial left ventricular pacing.
    Elliott MK; Mehta VS; Sidhu BS; Niederer S; Rinaldi CA
    Herz; 2021 Dec; 46(6):526-532. PubMed ID: 34694427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Invasive acute hemodynamic response to guide left ventricular lead implantation predicts chronic remodeling in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Duckett SG; Ginks M; Shetty AK; Bostock J; Gill JS; Hamid S; Kapetanakis S; Cunliffe E; Razavi R; Carr-White G; Rinaldi CA
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2011 Sep; 58(11):1128-36. PubMed ID: 21884950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.