437 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35715320)
1. Diagnostic Performance of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography-targeted biopsy for Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Kawada T; Yanagisawa T; Rajwa P; Sari Motlagh R; Mostafaei H; Quhal F; Laukhtina E; Aydh A; König F; Pallauf M; Pradere B; Ceci F; Baltzer PAT; Hacker M; Rasul S; Karakiewicz PI; Araki M; Nasu Y; Shariat SF
Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Aug; 5(4):390-400. PubMed ID: 35715320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Additive Diagnostic Value of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography to Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Triage in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer (PRIMARY): A Prospective Multicentre Study.
Emmett L; Buteau J; Papa N; Moon D; Thompson J; Roberts MJ; Rasiah K; Pattison DA; Yaxley J; Thomas P; Hutton AC; Agrawal S; Amin A; Blazevski A; Chalasani V; Ho B; Nguyen A; Liu V; Lee J; Sheehan-Dare G; Kooner R; Coughlin G; Chan L; Cusick T; Namdarian B; Kapoor J; Alghazo O; Woo HH; Lawrentschuk N; Murphy D; Hofman MS; Stricker P
Eur Urol; 2021 Dec; 80(6):682-689. PubMed ID: 34465492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fluorine-18-labelled Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography or Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Diagnose and Localise Prostate Cancer. A Prospective Single-arm Paired Comparison (PEDAL).
Wong LM; Sutherland T; Perry E; Tran V; Spelman T; Corcoran N; Lawrentschuk N; Woo H; Lenaghan D; Buchan N; Bax K; Symons J; Saeed Goolam A; Chalasani V; Hegarty J; Thomas L; Christov A; Ng M; Khanani H; Lee SF; Taubman K; Tarlinton L
Eur Urol Oncol; 2024 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 38281891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Can Negative Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Avoid the Need for Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer Patients? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis with Backup Histology as Reference Standard.
Stabile A; Pellegrino A; Mazzone E; Cannoletta D; de Angelis M; Barletta F; Scuderi S; Cucchiara V; Gandaglia G; Raggi D; Necchi A; Karakiewicz P; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Feb; 5(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 34538770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Combined Utility of
Kalapara AA; Ballok ZE; Ramdave S; O'Sullivan R; Ryan A; Konety B; Grummet JP; Frydenberg M
Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Jun; 5(3):314-320. PubMed ID: 33741337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Protocol for the PRIMARY clinical trial, a prospective, multicentre, cross-sectional study of the additive diagnostic value of gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron-emission tomography/computed tomography to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnostic setting for men being investigated for prostate cancer.
Amin A; Blazevski A; Thompson J; Scheltema MJ; Hofman MS; Murphy D; Lawrentschuk N; Sathianathen N; Kapoor J; Woo HH; Chalasani V; Rasiah K; van Leeuwen PJ; Tang R; Cusick T; Stricker P; Emmett L
BJU Int; 2020 Apr; 125(4):515-524. PubMed ID: 31957122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Establishment and prospective validation of an SUV
Jiao J; Kang F; Zhang J; Quan Z; Wen W; Zhao X; Ma S; Wu P; Yang F; Guo W; Yang X; Yuan J; Shi Y; Wang J; Qin W
Theranostics; 2021; 11(17):8396-8411. PubMed ID: 34373749
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Head-to-Head Comparison of
Exterkate L; Hermsen R; Küsters-Vandevelde HVN; Prette JF; Baas DJH; Somford DM; van Basten JA
Eur Urol Oncol; 2023 Dec; 6(6):574-581. PubMed ID: 37230883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Positive Predictive Value of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Mazzone E; Stabile A; Pellegrino F; Basile G; Cignoli D; Cirulli GO; Sorce G; Barletta F; Scuderi S; Bravi CA; Cucchiara V; Fossati N; Gandaglia G; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Oct; 4(5):697-713. PubMed ID: 33358543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The use of
Yang J; Tang Y; Zhou C; Zhou M; Li J; Hu S
Prostate; 2023 Apr; 83(5):430-439. PubMed ID: 36544382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using prostate-specific membrane antigen positron-emission tomography to guide prostate biopsies and stage men at high-risk of prostate cancer.
Bodar YJL; Boevé LMS; van Leeuwen PJ; Baars PC; Nieuwenhuijzen JA; van Haarst EP; Oddens JR; Donswijk ML; van Riel LAMJG; Scheltema MJ; Meijer D; Hendrikse NH; Oprea-Lager DE; Vis AN
BJU Int; 2023 Dec; 132(6):705-712. PubMed ID: 37620288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The PRIMARY Score: Using Intraprostatic
Emmett L; Papa N; Buteau J; Ho B; Liu V; Roberts M; Thompson J; Moon D; Sheehan-Dare G; Alghazo O; Agrawal S; Murphy D; Stricker P; Hope TA; Hofman MS
J Nucl Med; 2022 Nov; 63(11):1644-1650. PubMed ID: 35301240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reproducibility and Accuracy of the PRIMARY Score on PSMA PET and of PI-RADS on Multiparametric MRI for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis Within a Real-World Database.
Emmett L; Papa N; Counter W; Calais J; Barbato F; Burger I; Eiber M; Roberts MJ; Agrawal S; Franklin A; Xue A; Rasiah K; John N; Moon D; Frydenberg M; Yaxley J; Stricker P; Wong K; Coughlin G; Gianduzzo T; Kua B; Ho B; Nguyen A; Liu V; Lee J; Hsiao E; Sutherland T; Perry E; Fendler WP; Hope TA
J Nucl Med; 2024 Jan; 65(1):94-99. PubMed ID: 38050155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic accuracy of
Scheltema MJ; Chang JI; Stricker PD; van Leeuwen PJ; Nguyen QA; Ho B; Delprado W; Lee J; Thompson JE; Cusick T; Spriensma AS; Siriwardana AR; Yuen C; Kooner R; Hruby G; O'Neill G; Emmett L
BJU Int; 2019 Nov; 124 Suppl 1():42-49. PubMed ID: 31287613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. DEPROMP Trial: the additive value of PSMA-PET/CT-guided biopsy for prostate cancer management in biopsy naïve men-study protocol for a randomized trial.
Krausewitz P; Bundschuh RA; Gaertner FC; Essler M; Attenberger U; Luetkens J; Kristiansen G; Muders M; Ohlmann CH; Hauser S; Ellinger J; Ritter M
Trials; 2023 Mar; 24(1):167. PubMed ID: 36879271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging,
Kubihal V; Sharma S; Kumar R; Seth A; Kumar R; Kaushal S; Sarangi J; Gupta R; Das CJ
Indian J Nucl Med; 2021; 36(4):362-370. PubMed ID: 35125753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prospective analysis of clinically significant prostate cancer detection with [
Bodar YJL; Zwezerijnen BGJC; van der Voorn PJ; Jansen BHE; Smit RS; Kol SQ; Meijer D; de Bie K; Yaqub M; Windhorst BAD; Hendrikse HNH; Vis AN; Oprea-Lager DE
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2022 Apr; 49(5):1731-1742. PubMed ID: 34725727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic Performance of
Margel D; Bernstine H; Groshar D; Ber Y; Nezrit O; Segal N; Yakimov M; Baniel J; Domachevsky L
Radiology; 2021 Nov; 301(2):379-386. PubMed ID: 34463555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19.
Zhang LL; Li WC; Xu Z; Jiang N; Zang SM; Xu LW; Huang WB; Wang F; Sun HB
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2021 Feb; 48(2):483-492. PubMed ID: 32734457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of
Ling SW; de Jong AC; Schoots IG; Nasserinejad K; Busstra MB; van der Veldt AAM; Brabander T
Eur Urol Open Sci; 2021 Nov; 33():61-71. PubMed ID: 34632423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
