BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35715936)

  • 1. Oncological outcomes following minimally invasive surgery for pathological N2M0 colorectal cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis.
    Sueda T; Tei M; Mori S; Nishida K; Yoshikawa Y; Nomura M; Matsumura T; Koga C; Miyagaki H; Tsujie M; Akamaru Y
    Asian J Endosc Surg; 2022 Oct; 15(4):781-793. PubMed ID: 35715936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Minimally invasive versus open multivisceral resection for rectal cancer clinically invading adjacent organs: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Abe S; Nozawa H; Sasaki K; Murono K; Emoto S; Yokoyama Y; Matsuzaki H; Nagai Y; Shinagawa T; Sonoda H; Ishihara S
    Surg Endosc; 2024 Jun; 38(6):3263-3272. PubMed ID: 38658387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Minimally invasive versus open intersphincteric resection of low rectal cancer regardless of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: long-term oncologic outcomes.
    Shin JK; Kim HC; Lee WY; Yun SH; Cho YB; Huh JW; Park YA
    Sci Rep; 2021 May; 11(1):11001. PubMed ID: 34040037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Propensity matched analysis of minimally invasive and open radical resection for rectal cancer: comparison of short-term outcomes in elderly/frail patients.
    Li R; Zhou J; Zhao S; Sun L; Fu Y; Zhang C; Sun Q; Wang D
    J Robot Surg; 2024 Mar; 18(1):117. PubMed ID: 38466495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Open versus minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer: a single-center cohort study on 237 consecutive patients.
    Quero G; Rosa F; Ricci R; Fiorillo C; Giustiniani MC; Cina C; Menghi R; Doglietto GB; Alfieri S
    Updates Surg; 2019 Sep; 71(3):493-504. PubMed ID: 30868546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Minimally invasive surgery in elderly patients with rectal cancer: An analysis of the Bi-National Colorectal Cancer Audit (BCCA).
    van Harten MJ; Greenwood EB; Bedrikovetski S; Dudi-Venkata NN; Hunter RA; Kroon HM; Sammour T
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Sep; 46(9):1649-1655. PubMed ID: 32312590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Oncological outcomes following laparoscopic surgery for pathological T4 colon cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Sueda T; Tei M; Nishida K; Yoshikawa Y; Matsumura T; Koga C; Wakasugi M; Miyagaki H; Kawabata R; Tsujie M; Hasegawa J
    Surg Today; 2021 Mar; 51(3):404-414. PubMed ID: 32767131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Minimally Invasive Surgery with Open Surgery for Remnant Gastric Cancer: A Multi-institutional Cohort Study.
    Aoyama R; Tsunoda S; Okamura R; Yamashita Y; Hata H; Kinjo Y; Miki A; Kanaya S; Yamamoto M; Matsuo K; Manaka D; Tanaka E; Kawada H; Kondo M; Itami A; Kan T; Kadokawa Y; Ito T; Hirai K; Hosogi H; Nishigori T; Hisamori S; Hoshino N; Hida K; Goto Y; Nakayama T; Obama K
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2023 Jun; 30(6):3605-3614. PubMed ID: 36808589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Open versus minimally invasive resection of gastric GIST: a multi-institutional analysis of short- and long-term outcomes.
    Bischof DA; Kim Y; Dodson R; Carolina Jimenez M; Behman R; Cocieru A; Blazer DG; Fisher SB; Squires MH; Kooby DA; Maithel SK; Groeschl RT; Clark Gamblin T; Bauer TW; Karanicolas PJ; Law C; Quereshy FA; Pawlik TM
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Sep; 21(9):2941-8. PubMed ID: 24763984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of antithrombotic agents on short-term outcomes following minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Sueda T; Tei M; Nishida K; Nomura M; Yoshikawa Y; Matsumura T; Koga C; Miyagaki H; Tsujie M; Akamaru Y
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2022 May; 37(5):1049-1062. PubMed ID: 35411471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-term oncological outcomes for minimally invasive surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer-a population-based nationwide study with a non-inferiority design.
    Jadid KD; Cao Y; Petersson J; Sjövall A; Angenete E; Matthiessen P
    Colorectal Dis; 2023 May; 25(5):954-963. PubMed ID: 36762443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Proctectomy for Rectal Cancer: A Propensity-Matched Analysis of Bi-National Colorectal Cancer Audit Data.
    Bedrikovetski S; Dudi-Venkata NN; Kroon HM; Moore JW; Hunter RA; Sammour T
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2020 Jun; 63(6):778-787. PubMed ID: 32109916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exploration of the advantages of minimally invasive surgery for clinical T4 colorectal cancer compared with open surgery: A matched-pair analysis.
    Imaizumi K; Homma S; Miyaoka Y; Matsui H; Ichikawa N; Yoshida T; Takahashi N; Taketomi A
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Aug; 101(32):e29869. PubMed ID: 35960060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Minimally invasive resection of choledochal cyst: a feasible and safe surgical option.
    Margonis GA; Spolverato G; Kim Y; Marques H; Poultsides G; Maithel S; Aldrighetti L; Bauer TW; Jabbour N; Gamblin TC; Soares K; Pawlik TM
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2015 May; 19(5):858-65. PubMed ID: 25519084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimally invasive versus open pelvic exenterations for rectal cancer: a comparative analysis of perioperative and 3-year oncological outcomes.
    Kazi M; Kumar NAN; Rohila J; Sukumar V; Engineer R; Ankathi S; Desouza A; Saklani A
    BJS Open; 2021 Sep; 5(5):. PubMed ID: 34518872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Minimally invasive versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: Long-term results from a case-matched study of 633 patients.
    Cho MS; Kim CW; Baek SJ; Hur H; Min BS; Baik SH; Lee KY; Kim NK
    Surgery; 2015 Jun; 157(6):1121-9. PubMed ID: 25737005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of short- and long-term outcomes following laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients aged over 80 years old: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Sueda T; Tei M; Nishida K; Yoshikawa Y; Matsumura T; Koga C; Wakasugi M; Miyagaki H; Kawabata R; Tsujie M; Hasegawa J
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2021 Feb; 36(2):365-375. PubMed ID: 33026476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minimally invasive surgery as a treatment option for gastric cancer with liver metastasis: a comparison with open surgery.
    Li J; Xi H; Cui J; Zhang K; Gao Y; Liang W; Cai A; Wei B; Chen L
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Mar; 32(3):1422-1433. PubMed ID: 29075971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy of nonmetastatic pT4a colorectal cancer: a propensity score analysis.
    Guo HL; Chen JY; Tang YZ; Zeng QL; Jian QL; Li MZ; He YL; Wu WH
    Int J Surg; 2023 Nov; 109(11):3294-3302. PubMed ID: 37462996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for early gastric cancer are comparable with those for open surgery: analysis of 1,013 minimally invasive surgeries at a single institution.
    Oh SY; Kwon S; Lee KG; Suh YS; Choe HN; Kong SH; Lee HJ; Kim WH; Yang HK
    Surg Endosc; 2014 Mar; 28(3):789-95. PubMed ID: 24263458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.