These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35715936)

  • 41. Superior pathologic and clinical outcomes after minimally invasive rectal cancer resection, compared to open resection.
    Lee GC; Bordeianou LG; Francone TD; Blaszkowsky LS; Goldstone RN; Ricciardi R; Kunitake H; Qadan M
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Aug; 34(8):3435-3448. PubMed ID: 31844971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Minimally invasive RAMPS in well-selected left-sided pancreatic cancer within Yonsei criteria: long-term (>median 3 years) oncologic outcomes.
    Lee SH; Kang CM; Hwang HK; Choi SH; Lee WJ; Chi HS
    Surg Endosc; 2014 Oct; 28(10):2848-55. PubMed ID: 24853839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Long-term results after mitral valve surgery using minimally invasive versus sternotomy approach: a propensity matched comparison of a large single-center series.
    Cetinkaya A; Geier A; Bramlage K; Hein S; Bramlage P; Schönburg M; Choi YH; Richter M
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2021 Jun; 21(1):314. PubMed ID: 34174818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Mitral valve replacement via minimally invasive totally thoracoscopic surgery versus traditional median sternotomy: a propensity score matched comparative study.
    Liu J; Chen B; Zhang YY; Fang LZ; Xie B; Huang HL; Liu J; Lu C; Gu WD; Chen Z; Ma JX; Yuan HY; Chen JM; Zhuang J; Guo HM
    Ann Transl Med; 2019 Jul; 7(14):341. PubMed ID: 31475211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Minimally invasive surgery as a treatment option for gastric cancer in the elderly: comparison with open surgery for patients 80 years and older.
    Kwon IG; Cho I; Guner A; Kim HI; Noh SH; Hyung WJ
    Surg Endosc; 2015 Aug; 29(8):2321-30. PubMed ID: 25480603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Minimally Invasive versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy for Ductal Adenocarcinoma (DIPLOMA): A Pan-European Propensity Score Matched Study.
    van Hilst J; de Rooij T; Klompmaker S; Rawashdeh M; Aleotti F; Al-Sarireh B; Alseidi A; Ateeb Z; Balzano G; Berrevoet F; Björnsson B; Boggi U; Busch OR; Butturini G; Casadei R; Del Chiaro M; Chikhladze S; Cipriani F; van Dam R; Damoli I; van Dieren S; Dokmak S; Edwin B; van Eijck C; Fabre JM; Falconi M; Farges O; Fernández-Cruz L; Forgione A; Frigerio I; Fuks D; Gavazzi F; Gayet B; Giardino A; Groot Koerkamp B; Hackert T; Hassenpflug M; Kabir I; Keck T; Khatkov I; Kusar M; Lombardo C; Marchegiani G; Marshall R; Menon KV; Montorsi M; Orville M; de Pastena M; Pietrabissa A; Poves I; Primrose J; Pugliese R; Ricci C; Roberts K; Røsok B; Sahakyan MA; Sánchez-Cabús S; Sandström P; Scovel L; Solaini L; Soonawalla Z; Souche FR; Sutcliffe RP; Tiberio GA; Tomazic A; Troisi R; Wellner U; White S; Wittel UA; Zerbi A; Bassi C; Besselink MG; Abu Hilal M;
    Ann Surg; 2019 Jan; 269(1):10-17. PubMed ID: 29099399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Safety and prognosis analysis of transanal total mesorectal excision versus laparoscopic mesorectal excision for mid-low rectal cancer].
    Sun R; Cong L; Qiu HZ; Lin GL; Wu B; Niu BZ; Sun XY; Zhou JL; Xu L; Lu JY; Xiao Y
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 Jun; 25(6):522-530. PubMed ID: 35754217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Anastomotic Leakage After Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer Is Different Between Minimally Invasive Surgery and Open Surgery.
    Kim CW; Baek SJ; Hur H; Min BS; Baik SH; Kim NK
    Ann Surg; 2016 Jan; 263(1):130-7. PubMed ID: 25692355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Minimally Invasive Surgery for Lung Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Therapy in the United States.
    Kamel MK; Sholi AN; Harrison SW; Lee B; Port JL; Altorki NK; Stiles BM
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2022 Aug; 32(8):860-865. PubMed ID: 35041520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Impact of surgical approach on short-term oncological outcomes and recovery following low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
    Hyde LZ; Baser O; Mehendale S; Guo D; Shah M; Kiran RP
    Colorectal Dis; 2019 Aug; 21(8):932-942. PubMed ID: 31062521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Improved oncologic outcomes for minimally invasive left pancreatectomy: Propensity-score matched analysis of the National Cancer Database.
    Watson MD; Baimas-George MR; Thompson KJ; Iannitti DA; Ocuin LM; Baker EH; Martinie JB; Vrochides D
    J Surg Oncol; 2020 Dec; 122(7):1383-1392. PubMed ID: 32772366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Comparison of open and minimally invasive surgery for intradural-extramedullary spine tumors.
    Wong AP; Lall RR; Dahdaleh NS; Lawton CD; Smith ZA; Wong RH; Harvey MJ; Lam S; Koski TR; Fessler RG
    Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Aug; 39(2):E11. PubMed ID: 26235009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Laparoscopic versus open rectal resection: a 1:2 propensity score-matched analysis of oncological adequateness, short- and long-term outcomes.
    Garbarino GM; Canali G; Tarantino G; Costa G; Ferri M; Balducci G; Pilozzi E; Berardi G; Mercantini P
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2021 Apr; 36(4):801-810. PubMed ID: 33483843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Mini-invasive
    Ye SP; Qiu H; Liao SJ; Ai JH; Shi J
    World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Jun; 25(22):2819-2832. PubMed ID: 31236004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Impact of previous abdominal surgery on robotic-assisted rectal surgery in patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma: a propensity score matching study.
    Huang CW; Su WC; Chang TK; Ma CJ; Yin TC; Tsai HL; Chen PJ; Chen YC; Li CC; Hsieh YC; Wang JY
    World J Surg Oncol; 2020 Nov; 18(1):308. PubMed ID: 33239020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Minimally Invasive Colorectal Cancer Surgery in Europe: Implementation and Outcomes.
    Babaei M; Balavarca Y; Jansen L; Gondos A; Lemmens V; Sjövall A; Brge Johannesen T; Moreau M; Gabriel L; Gonçalves AF; Bento MJ; van de Velde T; Kempfer LR; Becker N; Ulrich A; Ulrich CM; Schrotz-King P; Brenner H
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 May; 95(22):e3812. PubMed ID: 27258522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted surgery for rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Sueda T; Tei M; Nishida K; Yoshikawa Y; Matsumura T; Koga C; Wakasugi M; Miyagaki H; Kawabata R; Tsujie M; Hasegawa J
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Apr; 16(2):323-331. PubMed ID: 33886065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Clinical features, surgical treatment strategy, and feasibility of minimally invasive surgery for synchronous and metachronous multiple colorectal cancers: A 14-year single-center experience.
    Tamura K; Fujimoto T; Shimizu T; Nagayoshi K; Mizuuchi Y; Hisano K; Horioka K; Shindo K; Nakata K; Ohuchida K; Nakamura M
    Surg Endosc; 2024 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 39347960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Comparative study of laparoscopic versus open technique for simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer and liver metastases with propensity score analysis.
    Shin JK; Kim HC; Lee WY; Yun SH; Cho YB; Huh JW; Park YA; Heo JS; Kim JM
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Nov; 34(11):4772-4780. PubMed ID: 31732856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Minimally invasive surgery for stage III colon adenocarcinoma is associated with less delay to initiation of adjuvant systemic therapy and improved survival.
    Lee L; Wong-Chong N; Kelly JJ; Nassif GJ; Albert MR; Monson JRT
    Surg Endosc; 2019 Feb; 33(2):460-470. PubMed ID: 29967992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.