BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3571596)

  • 1. Vertebral trabecular bone: comparison of single and dual-energy CT measurements with chemical analysis.
    Burgess AE; Colborne B; Zoffmann E
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1987; 11(3):506-15. PubMed ID: 3571596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vertebral mineral determination by quantitative computed tomography (QCT): accuracy of single and dual energy measurements.
    Glüer CC; Reiser UJ; Davis CA; Rutt BK; Genant HK
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1988; 12(2):242-58. PubMed ID: 3351039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Experimental studies on the accuracy of mineral content assessment in spongiosa bone using quantitative CT (single energy measurement)].
    Rohloff R; Hitzler H; Arndt W; Frey KW
    Rofo; 1985 Dec; 143(6):692-7. PubMed ID: 3001863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of vertebral fat content on quantitative CT density.
    Laval-Jeantet AM; Roger B; Bouysee S; Bergot C; Mazess RB
    Radiology; 1986 May; 159(2):463-6. PubMed ID: 3961178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measurement of lumbar spine bone mineral: a comparison of dual photon absorptiometry and computed tomography.
    Sambrook PN; Bartlett C; Evans R; Hesp R; Katz D; Reeve J
    Br J Radiol; 1985 Jul; 58(691):621-4. PubMed ID: 4016495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative computed tomography in measurement of vertebral trabecular bone mass. A modified method.
    Nilsson M; Johnell O; Jonsson K; Redlund-Johnell I
    Acta Radiol; 1988; 29(6):719-25. PubMed ID: 3190950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Vertebral bone mineral measurement using dual photon absorptiometry and computed tomography.
    Eriksson S; Isberg B; Lindgren U
    Acta Radiol; 1988; 29(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 2964852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Evaluation of bone mineral density with dual energy quantitative computed tomography (DEQCT)].
    Ito M; Hayashi K; Yamada N
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Aug; 49(8):999-1008. PubMed ID: 2594490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Local differences in mineral content in vertebral trabecular bone measured by dual-energy computed tomography.
    Nepper-Rasmussen J; Mosekilde L
    Acta Radiol; 1989; 30(4):369-71. PubMed ID: 2775598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A postprocessing dual energy technique for vertebral CT densitometry.
    Laval-Jeantet AM; Cann CE; Roger B; Dallant P
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1984 Dec; 8(6):1164-7. PubMed ID: 6501625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measurement of trabecular bone mineral by dual energy computed tomography.
    Adams JE; Chen SZ; Adams PH; Isherwood I
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1982 Jun; 6(3):601-7. PubMed ID: 7096705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reference values for trabecular and cortical vertebral bone density in single and dual-energy quantitative computed tomography.
    Kalender WA; Felsenberg D; Louis O; Lopez P; Klotz E; Osteaux M; Fraga J
    Eur J Radiol; 1989 May; 9(2):75-80. PubMed ID: 2743986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of a prototype dual-energy computed tomographic apparatus. II. Determination of vertebral bone mineral content.
    Vetter JR; Perman WH; Kalender WA; Mazess RB; Holden JE
    Med Phys; 1986; 13(3):340-3. PubMed ID: 3724694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Correlation of mechanical properties of vertebral trabecular bone with equivalent mineral density as measured by computed tomography.
    Lang SM; Moyle DD; Berg EW; Detorie N; Gilpin AT; Pappas NJ; Reynolds JC; Tkacik M; Waldron RL
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1988 Dec; 70(10):1531-8. PubMed ID: 3198678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Measurement of bone mineral content in trabecular bone of the 3rd lumbar vertebra by computed tomography with phantom for spine].
    Fukunaga M; Otsuka N; Sone T; Nagai K; Morita R; Kajihara Y; Nishishita S
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1986 May; 46(5):659-64. PubMed ID: 3763386
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bone mineral assessment: new dual-energy CT approach.
    Nickoloff EL; Feldman F; Atherton JV
    Radiology; 1988 Jul; 168(1):223-8. PubMed ID: 3380964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of collagen on bone mineral analysis with CT.
    Goodsitt MM; Kilcoyne RF; Gutcheck RA; Richardson ML; Rosenthal DI
    Radiology; 1988 Jun; 167(3):787-91. PubMed ID: 3363141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantitative computed tomography of lumbar vertebrae in Japanese patients with osteoporosis.
    Fujii Y; Tsutsumi M; Tsunenari T; Fukase M; Yoshimoto Y; Fujita T; Genant HK
    Bone Miner; 1989 Apr; 6(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 2787687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Mineral content of the spongiosa of the lumbar spine determined by computer tomography. Normal values for healthy perimenopausal women and their relation to mechanical stress of the vertebral column].
    Montag M; Dören M; Meyer-Galander HM; Montag T; Peters PE
    Radiologe; 1988 Apr; 28(4):161-5. PubMed ID: 3380946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Quantitative computerized tomographic determination of bone mineral content].
    Felsenberg D; Kalender WA; Banzer D; Schmilinsky G; Heyse M; Fischer E; Schneider U
    Rofo; 1988 Apr; 148(4):431-6. PubMed ID: 2834792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.