These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35716067)

  • 21. Correlation between airflow patterns and performance of a laboratory fume hood.
    Tseng LC; Huang RF; Chen CC; Chang CP
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2006 Dec; 3(12):694-706. PubMed ID: 17133690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Application of a tracer gas challenge with a human subject to investigate factors affecting the performance of laboratory fume hoods.
    Altemose BA; Flynn MR; Sprankle J
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1998 May; 59(5):321-7. PubMed ID: 9858975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Significance of face velocity fluctuation in relation to laboratory fume hood performance.
    Tseng LC; Huang RF; Chen CC
    Ind Health; 2010; 48(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 20160407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Assessing the containment efficiency of a microbiological safety cabinet during the simultaneous generation of a nanoaerosol and a tracer gas.
    Cesard V; Belut E; Prevost C; Taniere A; Rimbert N
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2013 Apr; 57(3):345-59. PubMed ID: 23123312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Airborne nanoparticle exposures while using constant-flow, constant-velocity, and air-curtain-isolated fume hoods.
    Tsai SJ; Huang RF; Ellenbecker MJ
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Jan; 54(1):78-87. PubMed ID: 19933309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Required response time for variable air volume fume hood controllers.
    Ekberg LE; Melin J
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2000 Mar; 44(2):143-50. PubMed ID: 10717266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of baffles and a louvered bypass on the airflow and the convective patterns of contaminant inside a fume hood.
    Hu P; Ingham DB; Wen X
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1998 May; 59(5):303-12. PubMed ID: 9858973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Containment testing of laboratory hoods in the as-used condition.
    Greenley PL; Billings CE; DiBerardinis LJ; Edwards RW; Barkley WE
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2000 Feb; 15(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 10675979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Numerical simulation of airflow around a variable volume/constant face velocity fume cupboard.
    Lan NS; Viswanathan S
    AIHAJ; 2001; 62(3):303-12. PubMed ID: 11434436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of boundary-layer separation controllers on a desktop fume hood.
    Huang RF; Chen JK; Hsu CM; Hung SF
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2016 Oct; 13(10):802-15. PubMed ID: 27104797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Estimation of leakage rate of air from a fume hood in a radioisotope laboratory using CFD simulations.
    Kim S; Yang H
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2018 Oct; 140():300-304. PubMed ID: 30099249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A guide to the design and installation of laboratory fume cupboards.
    Ann Occup Hyg; 1975 Dec; 18(4):273-91. PubMed ID: 1231588
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Quantitative evaluation of chemical fume hoods performance by CO2 tracer gas.
    Ghorbani-Shahna F; Feiz-Arefi M
    Work; 2022; 71(3):771-778. PubMed ID: 35253687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A review of published quantitative experimental studies on factors affecting laboratory fume hood performance.
    Ahn K; Woskie S; DiBerardinis L; Ellenbecker M
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Nov; 5(11):735-53. PubMed ID: 18780237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Planning Implications Related to Sterilization-Sensitive Science Investigations Associated with Mars Sample Return (MSR).
    Velbel MA; Cockell CS; Glavin DP; Marty B; Regberg AB; Smith AL; Tosca NJ; Wadhwa M; Kminek G; Meyer MA; Beaty DW; Carrier BL; Haltigin T; Hays LE; Agee CB; Busemann H; Cavalazzi B; Debaille V; Grady MM; Hauber E; Hutzler A; McCubbin FM; Pratt LM; Smith CL; Summons RE; Swindle TD; Tait KT; Udry A; Usui T; Westall F; Zorzano MP
    Astrobiology; 2022 Jun; 22(S1):S112-S164. PubMed ID: 34904892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Flow and leakage characteristics of a sashless inclined air-curtain (sIAC) fume hood containing tall pollutant-generation tanks.
    Chen JK; Huang RF; Hung WL
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2013; 10(12):694-704. PubMed ID: 24195536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Extension of the Advanced REACH Tool (ART) to Include Welding Fume Exposure.
    Sailabaht A; Wang F; Cherrie J
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Oct; 15(10):. PubMed ID: 30304799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Air movement around a worker in a low-speed flow field.
    Johnson AE; Fletcher B; Saunders CJ
    Ann Occup Hyg; 1996 Feb; 40(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 9054302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effect of thermal loading on laboratory fume hood performance.
    Johnston JD; Chessin SJ; Chesnovar BW; Lillquist DR
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2000 Nov; 15(11):863-8. PubMed ID: 11062932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluating containment effectiveness of A2 and B2 biological safety cabinets.
    Taylor AV; Baker N; Hulsey M; Bennett CC; Meiners M; Gonzales BA
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2019 Apr; 76(9):599-607. PubMed ID: 31361829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.