73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35716317)
1. Do preferences differ based on respondent experience of a health issue and its treatment? A case study using a public health intervention.
Mott DJ; Ternent L; Vale L
Eur J Health Econ; 2023 Apr; 24(3):413-423. PubMed ID: 35716317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. QALY-type preference and willingness-to-pay among end-of-life patients with cancer treatments: a pilot study using discrete choice experiment.
Yin Y; Peng Q; Ma L; Dong Y; Sun Y; Xu S; Ding N; Liu X; Zhao M; Tang Y; Mei Z; Shao H; Yan D; Tang W
Qual Life Res; 2024 Mar; 33(3):753-765. PubMed ID: 38079024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Collecting Physicians' Preferences on Medical Devices: Are We Doing It Right? Evidence from Italian Orthopedists Using 2 Different Stated Preference Methods.
Armeni P; Meregaglia M; Borsoi L; Callea G; Torbica A; Benazzo F; Tarricone R
Med Decis Making; 2023; 43(7-8):886-900. PubMed ID: 37837325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Identifying patient preferences for diabetes care: A protocol for implementing a discrete choice experiment in Samoa.
Rivara AC; Galárraga O; Selu M; Arorae M; Wang R; Faasalele-Savusa K; Rosen R; Hawley NL; Viali S
PLoS One; 2023; 18(12):e0295845. PubMed ID: 38134044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A discrete choice experiment to understand public preferences and priorities for risk-stratified bowel cancer screening programmes in the UK.
Dennison RA; Thomas CV; Morris S; Usher-Smith JA
Prev Med; 2023 Dec; 177():107786. PubMed ID: 37984646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A discrete choice experiment to elicit preferences for a chronic disease screening programme in Queensland, Australia.
Senanayake S; Barnett A; Brain D; Allen M; Powell EE; O'Beirne J; Valery P; Hickman IJ; Kularatna S
Public Health; 2024 Mar; 228():105-111. PubMed ID: 38354579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Type 2 diabetes patients' preferences and willingness to pay for lifestyle programs: a discrete choice experiment.
Veldwijk J; Lambooij MS; van Gils PF; Struijs JN; Smit HA; de Wit GA
BMC Public Health; 2013 Nov; 13():1099. PubMed ID: 24289831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Public preferences for online medical consultations in China: a discrete choice experiment.
Wang P; Huang Y; Li H; Xi X
Front Public Health; 2023; 11():1282387. PubMed ID: 38192546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing Discrete Choice Experiment with Swing Weighting to Estimate Attribute Relative Importance: A Case Study in Lung Cancer Patient Preferences.
Veldwijk J; Smith IP; Oliveri S; Petrocchi S; Smith MY; Lanzoni L; Janssens R; Huys I; de Wit GA; Groothuis-Oudshoorn CGM
Med Decis Making; 2024 Feb; 44(2):203-216. PubMed ID: 38178591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Influence of Ambient Weather Conditions on Stated Preferences for Ecosystem Services Management.
Notaro S; Grilli G
Environ Manage; 2023 Dec; 72(6):1228-1240. PubMed ID: 37264163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Public preferences and willingness to pay for a net zero NHS: a protocol for a discrete choice experiment in England and Scotland.
Loría-Rebolledo LE; Abbott M; Antunes M; Norwood P; Ryan M; Watson V; Wu H
BMJ Open; 2024 Jun; 14(6):e082863. PubMed ID: 38908844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Longitudinal Evaluation of the Preferences of Patients With Advanced Cancer for Quality of Life and Survival in Malaysia: A Discrete Choice Experiment.
Yong ASJ; Lim KK; Fox-Rushby J; Ismail F; Hamzah E; Cheong MWL; Teoh SL
Value Health; 2023 Dec; 26(12):1772-1781. PubMed ID: 37741445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Do Past Experience and Group Heterogeneity Matter to Consumer Preferences? Evidence From a Choice Experiment in Urban China.
Liu R; Liang F; Heng Y; Gao Z; Snell HA; Rae A; Ma H
Front Psychol; 2022; 13():843433. PubMed ID: 35572270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Treatment Preferences for Acute Allergic Reactions: A Discrete Choice Experiment.
Löfvendahl S; Andersson E; Olofsson S; Wahlberg K; Bjermer L; Tornling G; Hjelmgren J
J Health Econ Outcomes Res; 2024; 11(1):157-165. PubMed ID: 38845782
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Using discrete choice experiments to value informal care tasks: exploring preference heterogeneity.
Mentzakis E; Ryan M; McNamee P
Health Econ; 2011 Aug; 20(8):930-44. PubMed ID: 20799343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Co-production of randomized clinical trials with patients: a case study in autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant for patients with scleroderma.
Aguiar M; Laba TL; Munro S; Burch T; Beckett J; Kaal KJ; Bansback N; Hudson M; Harrison M
Trials; 2021 Sep; 22(1):611. PubMed ID: 34503552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Eliciting Exploratory Patient Preference Data: A Case Study in a Rare Disease.
Ho KA; Pierce A; Stoltenberg M; Tarancon T; Mansfield C
Pharmaceut Med; 2024 Jan; 38(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 38123708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How people know their risk preference.
Arslan RC; Brümmer M; Dohmen T; Drewelies J; Hertwig R; Wagner GG
Sci Rep; 2020 Sep; 10(1):15365. PubMed ID: 32958788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Which value aspects are relevant for the evaluation of medical devices? Exploring stakeholders' views through a Web-Delphi process.
Freitas L; Vieira ACL; Oliveira MD; Monteiro H; Bana E Costa CA
BMC Health Serv Res; 2023 Jun; 23(1):593. PubMed ID: 37291513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Preferences and Data Quality between Discrete Choice Experiments Conducted in Online and Face-to-Face Respondents.
Jiang R; Pullenayegum E; Shaw JW; Mühlbacher A; Lee TA; Walton S; Kohlmann T; Norman R; Pickard AS
Med Decis Making; 2023 Aug; 43(6):667-679. PubMed ID: 37199407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
