These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3571722)

  • 1. The effect of broadband noise on the human brain-stem auditory evoked response. IV. Additivity of forward-masking and rate-induced wave V latency shifts.
    Burkard R; Hecox KE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Apr; 81(4):1064-72. PubMed ID: 3571722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of broadband noise on the human brain-stem auditory evoked response. III. Anatomic locus.
    Burkard R; Hecox KE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Apr; 81(4):1050-63. PubMed ID: 3571721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of broadband noise on the human brainstem auditory evoked response. I. Rate and intensity effects.
    Burkard R; Hecox K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Oct; 74(4):1204-13. PubMed ID: 6643843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Auditory brainstem response latency in forward masking, a marker of sensory deficits in listeners with normal hearing thresholds.
    Mehraei G; Gallardo AP; Shinn-Cunningham BG; Dau T
    Hear Res; 2017 Mar; 346():34-44. PubMed ID: 28159652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of broadband noise on the human brainstem auditory evoked response. II. Frequency specificity.
    Burkard R; Hecox K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Oct; 74(4):1214-23. PubMed ID: 6643844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ipsilateral, contralateral, and binaural masking effects on the human brain-stem auditory-evoked responses to click stimuli.
    Owen GA; Burkard R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Apr; 89(4 Pt 1):1760-7. PubMed ID: 2045584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Brain-stem auditory-evoked responses elicited by maximum length sequences: effect of simultaneous masking noise.
    Burkard R; Shi Y; Hecox KE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Apr; 87(4):1665-72. PubMed ID: 2341670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stimulus dependencies of the gerbil brain-stem auditory-evoked response (BAER). II: Effects of broadband noise level and high-pass masker cutoff frequency across click polarity.
    Burkard R; Voigt HF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jun; 85(6):2526-36. PubMed ID: 2745877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Response enhancement and reduction of the auditory brain-stem response in a forward-masking paradigm.
    Ananthanarayan AK; Gerken GM
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1987 Apr; 66(4):427-39. PubMed ID: 2435523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The combined effects of forward masking by noise and high click rate on monaural and binaural human auditory nerve and brainstem potentials.
    Pratt H; Polyakov A; Bleich N; Mittelman N
    Hear Res; 2004 Jul; 193(1-2):83-94. PubMed ID: 15219323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stimulus dependencies of the gerbil brain-stem auditory-evoked response (BAER). III: Additivity of click level and rate with noise level.
    Burkard R; Voigt HF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Nov; 88(5):2222-34. PubMed ID: 2269738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Electrophysiologic studies on the course of the adaptation phase following noise stress].
    von Wedel H; Dum N; Walger M
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1985 Aug; 64(8):436-40. PubMed ID: 4046695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Auditory brain stem responses from human adults and infants: restriction of frequency contribution by notched-noise masking.
    Folsom RC; Wynne MK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Oct; 80(4):1057-64. PubMed ID: 3771926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Forward masking of auditory nerve (N1) and brainstem (wave V) responses in humans.
    Kramer SJ; Teas DC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Sep; 72(3):795-803. PubMed ID: 7130538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of noise masking on the brain-stem and middle-latency auditory evoked potentials: central and peripheral components.
    Gott PS; Hughes EC
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1989; 74(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 2465888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Forward masking of auditory nerve and brainstem responses using high-pass noise maskers.
    Kramer SJ; Teas DC
    Hear Res; 1982 Dec; 8(3):317-37. PubMed ID: 7153185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The selective effects of central masking on brain stem potentials.
    Prasher DK; Cohen M
    Br J Audiol; 1984 May; 18(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 6733320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Recovery from prior stimulation: masking of speech by interrupted noise for younger and older adults with normal hearing.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Apr; 113(4 Pt 1):2084-94. PubMed ID: 12703719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Auditory brainstem response forward-masking recovery functions in older humans with normal hearing.
    Walton J; Orlando M; Burkard R
    Hear Res; 1999 Jan; 127(1-2):86-94. PubMed ID: 9925019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Frequency specificity of the human auditory brainstem and middle latency responses using notched noise masking.
    Oates PA; Purdy SC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):995-1009. PubMed ID: 11519624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.