These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35717254)

  • 1. Debriefing strategies for interprofessional simulation-a qualitative study.
    Holmes C; Mellanby E
    Adv Simul (Lond); 2022 Jun; 7(1):18. PubMed ID: 35717254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. "Thinking on your feet"-a qualitative study of debriefing practice.
    Krogh K; Bearman M; Nestel D
    Adv Simul (Lond); 2016; 1():12. PubMed ID: 29449981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Factors associated with interprofessional engagement in debriefing following pediatric simulation-based team training.
    Byrnes R; Chipman M; Priest Z; Schreiber C; Michaud J; Barbour T; Ferguson M; Craig W; Mallory L
    J Interprof Care; 2021 Jun; ():1-7. PubMed ID: 34137655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quality of interdisciplinary postsimulation debriefing: 360° evaluation.
    Hull L; Russ S; Ahmed M; Sevdalis N; Birnbach DJ
    BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn; 2017; 3(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 35515097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.
    Eddy K; Jordan Z; Stephenson M
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2016 Apr; 14(4):96-137. PubMed ID: 27532314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intersections of power: videoconferenced debriefing of a rural interprofessional simulation team by an urban interprofessional debriefing team.
    Dalinghaus K; Regehr G; Nimmon L
    Perspect Med Educ; 2021 Oct; 10(5):286-292. PubMed ID: 34106435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interprofessional team debriefings with or without an instructor after a simulated crisis scenario: An exploratory case study.
    Boet S; Pigford AA; Fitzsimmons A; Reeves S; Triby E; Bould MD
    J Interprof Care; 2016 Nov; 30(6):717-725. PubMed ID: 27309589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cultural Prototypes and Differences in Simulation Debriefing.
    Ulmer FF; Sharara-Chami R; Lakissian Z; Stocker M; Scott E; Dieckmann P
    Simul Healthc; 2018 Aug; 13(4):239-246. PubMed ID: 29672469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The community of inquiry framework for virtual team-to-team debriefings during interprofessional trauma simulations.
    Dickinson KJ; Kimbrough MK; Young A; Goddard C; Urban K; Kalkwarf KJ; Bhavaraju A; Margolick J
    Global Surg Educ; 2022; 1(1):11. PubMed ID: 38624909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Guiding, Intermediating, Facilitating, and Teaching (GIFT): A Conceptual Framework for Simulation Educator Roles in Healthcare Debriefing.
    Roze des Ordons AL; Eppich W; Lockyer J; Wilkie RD; Grant V; Cheng A
    Simul Healthc; 2022 Oct; 17(5):283-292. PubMed ID: 34839303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does a Written Tool to Guide Structured Debriefing Improve Discourse? Implications for Interprofessional Team Simulation.
    Thompson R; Sullivan S; Campbell K; Osman I; Statz B; Jung HS
    J Surg Educ; 2018 Nov; 75(6):e240-e245. PubMed ID: 30093336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Approaches to interpersonal conflict in simulation debriefings: A qualitative study.
    Roze des Ordons AL; Cheng A; Lockyer J; Wilkie RD; Grant V; Eppich W
    Med Educ; 2021 Nov; 55(11):1284-1296. PubMed ID: 34291487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Challenges of interprofessional team training: a qualitative analysis of residents' perceptions.
    van Schaik S; Plant J; O'Brien B
    Educ Health (Abingdon); 2015; 28(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 26261115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.
    MacKinnon K; Marcellus L; Rivers J; Gordon C; Ryan M; Butcher D
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 26447004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Debriefer cognitive load during Traditional Reflective Debriefing vs. Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice interdisciplinary team training.
    Wiltrakis S; Hwu R; Holmes S; Iyer S; Goodwin N; Mathai C; Gillespie S; Hebbar KB; Colman N
    Adv Simul (Lond); 2024 Jun; 9(1):23. PubMed ID: 38835053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. DE-CODE: a coding scheme for assessing debriefing interactions.
    Seelandt JC; Grande B; Kriech S; Kolbe M
    BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn; 2018; 4(2):51-58. PubMed ID: 35515884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of simulation debriefing methods with interprofessional learning.
    Brown DK; Wong AH; Ahmed RA
    J Interprof Care; 2018 Jul; 32(1):779-781. PubMed ID: 30024297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Frameworks and quality measures used for debriefing in team-based simulation: a systematic review.
    Endacott R; Gale T; O'Connor A; Dix S
    BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn; 2019; 5(2):61-72. PubMed ID: 35519834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Student Performance During a Simulated Patient Encounter Has No Impact on Debriefer Adherence to PEARLS Debriefing Model.
    McNutt R; Tews M; Kleinheksel AJ
    Med Sci Educ; 2021 Jun; 31(3):1141-1148. PubMed ID: 34457957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The resident experience with psychological safety during interprofessional critical event debriefings.
    Hitchner L; Yore M; Burk C; Mason J; Sawtelle Vohra S
    AEM Educ Train; 2023 Apr; 7(2):e10864. PubMed ID: 37013133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.